Jump to content

Not the smartest local criminal


bullets13

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, tvc184 said:

Let’s see, I’m a convicted felon so I’m going to drive on a public street and shoot a dog. 

He gets a two for one deal there. It is a felony to shoot the dog and then another felony for processing the firearm to begin with. 

Is that right?

I know a couple of people that still shoot dogs for showing up on their property... while it's a bad idea, I didn't realize that it was felonious.  

Nice use of that adjective, huh?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

Is that right?

I know a couple of people that still shoot dogs for showing up on their property... while it's a bad idea, I didn't realize that it was felonious.  

Nice use of that adjective, huh?

To be legal they have to be attacking a pet, person, or livestock.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

Is that right?

I know a couple of people that still shoot dogs for showing up on their property... while it's a bad idea, I didn't realize that it was felonious.  

Nice use of that adjective, huh?

It is a felony to kill a cat or a dog if it is not yours without the consent of the owner. If it is a wild animal (feral), it has no owner and is a felony.

As B13 stated, you can kill an animal in self-defense or if it is attacking your livestock. I believe you would have a hard time trying to say you killed a cat in self-defense. If a Rottweiler, Doberman, Chow, etc., was attacking a person,  I am sure It would justify shooting it.

So if you shoot that wild neighborhood cat sleeping on top of your car with a pellet gun and get caught and prosecuted, you could potentially do time in prison.

In my opinion and knowing Texas law.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

Is that right?

I know a couple of people that still shoot dogs for showing up on their property... while it's a bad idea, I didn't realize that it was felonious.  

Nice use of that adjective, huh?

And just for informational purposes in reference to wild or feral cats and dogs being protected even though they have no owner and may be on your property, The law says it is unlawful to kill an animal without consent of the owner or to torture the animal. The question becomes, what is an animal?

This is a quote from the Texas Penal Code in reference to cruelty to non-livestock animals: "Animal" means a domesticated living creature, including any stray or feral cat or dog, and a wild living creature previously captured.

“Including any stray or feral”’is significant  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, 5GallonBucket said:

Are deer considered livestock

As SM said, no unless you’re raising them, probably under a permit, for food. Wild animals are not livestock.

This is the Texas Penal Code definition of livestock:

(5) "Livestock animal" means:(A) cattle, sheep, swine, goats, ratites, or poultry commonly raised for human consumption;

(B) a horse, pony, mule, donkey, or hinny;

(C) native or nonnative hoofstock raised under agriculture practices; or

(D) native or nonnative fowl commonly raised under agricultural practices.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, tvc184 said:

As SM said, no unless you’re raising them, probably under a permit, for food. Wild animals are not livestock.

This is the Texas Penal Code definition of livestock:

(5) "Livestock animal" means:(A) cattle, sheep, swine, goats, ratites, or poultry commonly raised for human consumption;

(B) a horse, pony, mule, donkey, or hinny;

(C) native or nonnative hoofstock raised under agriculture practices; or

(D) native or nonnative fowl commonly raised under agricultural practices.

Good info

im pretty much surrounded by deer lease and some of the hunters in the past have talked about shooting dogs....

I have 3 Anatolian/Great Pyrenees mixes....during deer season I keep them fenced in but every so often they get out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 5GallonBucket said:

Good info

im pretty much surrounded by deer lease and some of the hunters in the past have talked about shooting dogs....

I have 3 Anatolian/Great Pyrenees mixes....during deer season I keep them fenced in but every so often they get out

Unfortunately some hunters will definitely shoot dogs that come out in their lanes during deer season.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saw on the News last week some yahoo dropping off an Alaskan Husky in a desolate area.  Beautiful dog that chased the SUV down the road as they were leaving.  Not sure how anyone could do that.  Someone else filmed it and the Law is after them now.

On a plus note, a family adopted the dog.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hagar said:

Saw on the News last week some yahoo dropping off an Alaskan Husky in a desolate area.  Beautiful dog that chased the SUV down the road as they were leaving.  Not sure how anyone could do that.  Someone else filmed it and the Law is after them now.

On a plus note, a family adopted the dog.

I see it all the time on my road

somebody dropped of kittens that were maybe 2 days old....we took them and bottle fed them....they are 6 years old now. And they kill plenty of mice, snakes and cardinals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/30/2021 at 7:06 PM, 5GallonBucket said:

Good info

im pretty much surrounded by deer lease and some of the hunters in the past have talked about shooting dogs....

I have 3 Anatolian/Great Pyrenees mixes....during deer season I keep them fenced in but every so often they get out

I have dogs on my lease all the time.  I don’t like them there, but I wouldn’t shoot one unless it was growling at me on my way to the stand or something.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,892
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    corixek265
    Newest Member
    corixek265
    Joined


  • Posts

    • That’s a president? How embarrassing. 
    • Really good hire! As I stated previously on this thread, Mike T has been an essential part of WB’s success the last few years & is a student of the game & I have a ton of respect for how he goes about things as a coach. Big on teaching kids how to do things the right way to prepare them for not only basketball but the game of life. He’ll be fine there, my only question is what kind of talent does WB have returning?  Best thing about this situation for Mike T is WB will be 5A for at least the next 2 years, so he should win a lot of games & have some deep playoff runs.
    • So which coaches kid gets the QB job? Trotter or Barrier
    • A Winnie land owner (and others) sued the State of Texas after they built IH-10 a few feet higher in order to help contain storm flooding. Sure enough a hurricane hit and flooded the land. The storm improvements worked!! Unfortunately the state sacrificed several people’s properties in using the interstate highway as a dam.  Richard DeVillier tried to sue Texas under our laws and Constitution and the US Constitution under the Fifth Amendment “taking clause” (eminent domain). After a favorable ruling in the federal district court on the right to sue Texas directly, the Fifth Circuit Court in New Orleans overturned that ruling and said that the DeVlier had no authority to sue Texas directly.  On Tuesday a unanimous US Supreme Court ruled that DeVillier and others had the right to sue Texas directly under Texas law and under the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution. The case is now sent back down to the lower court. DeVillier and others have not won their lawsuits as the case has not been decided on its merits at a trial. He still has to go to prove his case. What they did win was a unanimous Supreme Court agreeing that he has the right to bring Texas to trial for taking his property with just compensation.   
    • Don't jump?!  What?!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...