Jump to content

Todd Dodge

wosmustangs

By wosmustangs
in High School Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

Mr. Buddy Garrity

Mr. Buddy Garrity

Posted
Posted
36 minutes ago, navydawg31 said:

The domino effect…  this has to be the first year that I can remember in several years that his name isn’t linked to leaving.. Possibly go on back to west lake? 

That's cause Westlake next Head Coach is already on staff it seems.

 

If Fairchief leaves Png I believe he'll head for the DFW area, but it wouldn't surprise me if a big time West Texas school were to be open that his name would be in the hat also. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
navydawg31

navydawg31

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, Mr. Buddy Garrity said:

That's cause Westlake next Head Coach is already on staff it seems.

 

If Fairchief leaves Png I believe he'll head for the DFW area, but it wouldn't surprise me if a big time West Texas school were to be open that his name would be in the hat also. 

I do believe yes DFW would make more sense… but couldn’t agree more with what you put. Just reading and listening to people they expect a big shuffle of coaches moving after the season. Like I said the domino effect will happen… 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
oldschool2

oldschool2

Posted
Posted
On 7/26/2021 at 9:50 AM, pakronos said:

welp, there goes any chance he come home to save PAM from a staff that can't get out the first rd against 4th place teams...

Ask Barbers Hill if a big name coach is all it takes to start making deep runs.  Spoiler alert: it takes more than a winning experienced coach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Separation Scientist

Separation Scientist

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, Mr. Buddy Garrity said:

Nah it's not false, he's talking about the hires they (the ISD) have made recently. (Gage, Westy, Abseck in a row)

Just because BH hired Westerberg does not mean anyone ever claimed any certain coach is ALL  anyone needs to make a deep run. This is a totally false narrative. Feel free to quote whoever said it. Show the source. 

This lie is just more latent BH bashing, thats all.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Buddy Garrity

Mr. Buddy Garrity

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Separation Scientist said:

Just because BH hired Westerberg does not mean anyone ever claimed any certain coach is ALL  anyone needs to make a deep run. This is a totally false narrative. Feel free to quote whoever said it. Show the source. 

This lie is just more latent BH bashing, thats all.  

 

Smdh he'll tell you when he gets on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Reagan

Reagan

Posted
Posted
On 7/29/2021 at 9:11 AM, oldschool2 said:

Ask Barbers Hill if a big name coach is all it takes to start making deep runs.  Spoiler alert: it takes more than a winning experienced coach.

I've got a scenario for you.  And it involves speculation which we do a lot here, including me:  Say you were tasked with finding a football coach to bring a school a State Title.  Your reputation would be on the line and the possibility of getting fired if it never works out.  Between these two coaches, which would you hire:  Art Briles or Phil Danaher?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
oldschool2

oldschool2

Posted
Posted
On 7/29/2021 at 2:44 PM, Separation Scientist said:

ALL?

I don't think BH or anyone has ever claimed or said that, ever. False narrative. 

Oh no?  Am I imagining all of the conversations I was involved in after his hire about: “this many years until he wins a district title..that many years until he wins a playoff game OR MORE”??

Im old but I remember very vividly arguing with people on this very site about unrealistic expectations for that school due SOLELY to his hire.  May wanna dig into the SeTxsports archives..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
oldschool2

oldschool2

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, Reagan said:

I've got a scenario for you.  And it involves speculation which we do a lot here, including me:  Say you were tasked with finding a football coach to bring a school a State Title.  Your reputation would be on the line and the possibility of getting fired if it never works out.  Between these two coaches, which would you hire:  Art Briles or Phil Danaher?

If between those two only.. I’d personally go with Briles.  Proven success at a wider array of situations.  More than 1 recently, actually.  And don’t get me wrong, Danaher is deservingly a legend.  HOF coach for sure..but everyone knows that Region 4 just isn’t the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Uncle Pig

Uncle Pig

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, Reagan said:

I've got a scenario for you.  And it involves speculation which we do a lot here, including me:  Say you were tasked with finding a football coach to bring a school a State Title.  Your reputation would be on the line and the possibility of getting fired if it never works out.  Between these two coaches, which would you hire:  Art Briles or Phil Danaher?

Not even close; Briles all the way 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hagar

Hagar

Posted
Posted

I’m no where near being a Coach, but based on my observations over the years, the HC is just part of the equation.  The remainder of the Staff is what will make a successful Coach/Team.  Take Surratt.  Was he “unbeatable” prior to going to Carthage?  I go back to Doug Etheridge and his time at, what was referred to then, the University of PNG.  After all his success at PNG, he went to (I believe) Round Rock.  There (if memory is correct) he was just an average Coach.  I figure it’s because he wasn’t able to bring all his Staff.  Evidently the Staff at Carthage compliment each other.  The HC is the nucleus, but good assistants make it complete.  So, Jmo but if a Coaching Staff is a winning team, so will be the football players.

My 2 cents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Separation Scientist

Separation Scientist

Posted
Posted
20 hours ago, oldschool2 said:

Oh no?  Am I imagining all of the conversations I was involved in after his hire about: “this many years until he wins a district title..that many years until he wins a playoff game OR MORE”??

Im old but I remember very vividly arguing with people on this very site about unrealistic expectations for that school due SOLELY to his hire.  May wanna dig into the SeTxsports archives..

I not going to dig into anything. You made a bold statement, so you can dig and back it up.

Make darn sure you find the word "ALL"  Have fun. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Uncle Pig

Uncle Pig

Posted
Posted
On 7/29/2021 at 2:44 PM, Separation Scientist said:

ALL?

I don't think BH or anyone has ever claimed or said that, ever. False narrative. 

Complete change of subject, and I’m certainly not calling you out, but I swear the word “narrative” is the most trendy, overused word as of late. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • tvc184
      It’s kinda weird…

      By tvc184 · Posted

      Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • Englebert
      It’s kinda weird…

      By Englebert · Posted

      You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • UT alum
      It’s kinda weird…

      By UT alum · Posted

      Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • UT alum
      It’s kinda weird…

      By UT alum · Posted

      Election interference. Cheating.
    • UT alum
      It’s kinda weird…

      By UT alum · Posted

      It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...