Jump to content

Marxist Rep. Maxine Waters Encourages Riots to Continue Unless Chauvin Convicted of Murder!


Reagan

Recommended Posts

59 minutes ago, 5GallonBucket said:

This is the hidden content, please

 

Pro sports——what a joke. I guess they ll take days off for those fans that want to riot can.

 

 

How about if it doesn't go their way they protest by cancelling the NBA and NFL seasons!  It prolly doesn't matter, though, because nobody watches anymore anyway!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, 5GallonBucket said:

When this not guilty verdict comes and riots ensue I hope the national guard and law enforcement bring the heat.  
 

Givin the intelligence level of these rioters they ll probably riot either way.

 

As long as the Dems are in charge, they can riot with impunity.

Now the Judge has said that Waters might get the Defense a retrial with her incendiary comments.  I hope it does.  She’s way out of line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, 5GallonBucket said:

When this not guilty verdict comes and riots ensue I hope the national guard and law enforcement bring the heat.  
 

Givin the intelligence level of these rioters they ll probably riot either way.

 

Well, it won’t be not guilty. But it won’t necessarily be the desired verdict either. At the very least it will be manslaughter 2. More probable would be murder 3. Who knows though. I predict no matter the verdict, there will be rioting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, baddog said:

I hope you’re wrong. 

 

 

 

Believe me, I do too. Why is Hillary still walking around after Benghazi? The game is rigged. (Just one of MANY examples)

In this case, the Republicans simply don’t have enough house votes. Plus most politicians don’t like carrying out these expulsions fir fear of setting a precedent which may one day come knocking on their own door. They are all a bunch of self serving, crooked liars. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, SmashMouth said:

Well, it won’t be not guilty. But it won’t necessarily be the desired verdict either. At the very least it will be manslaughter 2. More probable would be murder 3. Who knows though. I predict no matter the verdict, there will be rioting. 

I watched a decent breakdown of the charges the other day.... It went something like:

 

First, the prosecution has to prove that Chauvin's actions directly led to Mr. Floyd's death.  I'm not sure that's been proven beyond a reasonable doubt.  Then you get to the charges:

 

1.  2nd Degree Murder.... Chauvin would have had to unintentionally killed Floyd during the commission of another felony.  There is no other felony.... he was using a restraint approved by his own department to restrain Floyd.

2.  3rd Degree Murder.... Chauvin would have to have act depraved indifference to others.... Think about somebody selling tainted drugs, dropping bricks off a bridge into traffic... no specific victim, but the suspect would have to have know his actions could harm others.  Except in this instance, the victim was actually well known, and there's no indication that Chauvin or anybody else would have suspected that simply restraining Floyd would have led to his death. 

3.  2nd Degree Manslaughter....  Would indicate gross negligence on Chauvin's part... but gross negligence doesn't exist unless Chauvin should have KNOWN that his behavior could lead to Floyd's death.... except nobody really believes that holding somebody down using a department approved restraint would lead to someone else's death.  Literally.... thousands and thousands of people have been successfully restrained using this technique for years without injury... except this time the victim died and it was captured on video. 

The media isn't talking about it, either, but the defense played videotape of Floyd being arrested in 2019, and during that arrest Floyd ingested the drugs that he was holding.  It creates a strong suspicion about whether or not he may have done something similar in 2020.

 

I don't know what will happen.  Since you have to have a unanimous verdict to convict or acquit, I suspect that we'll see a mistrial in a week or so.  The more time passes, the less chance I think we'll see of having a verdict of either sort. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,935
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Diboll - 1  Central Heights- 0
    • Just to expound a little further, so you are not confused...I, along with so many others, are laughing at your desperation. You are working overtime, nay, double even triple time, trying to convince normal people Trump was bad for the country. His policies provided for peace all over the world, low gas prices, low food prices, energy independence, closed border, low inflation, record low unemployment, and on and on and on. You try to counter this narrative by saying unemployment skyrocketed on his watch. You said this knowing full well the unemployment rate went up due to Covid. Your narrative is just so laughable, to the point of side-splitting hilarity. Who would even attempt this asinine narrative? Now, even if you get past the utter stupidity of that MSNBC talking point, you provide another side-splitting hilarious tidbit of evidence to back your claim of Trump being bad for the country. You actually tried to tie the stock market going down to Trump...after Covid. You, I, and everybody else knows the stock market was flourishing under Trump...until Covid hit. This argument is just as bad as the other one. Again, who would even attempt this narrative? The only thing you could remotely muster that had any sliver of truthfulness, is that spending increased. Sure, Trump rebuilt the military and gave them a deserved raise. But he also had to shut down the government due to Democrats demanding an even more, and very detrimental, increase in spending. And in a true extremely exaggerated fashion, you proclaim that spending "skyrocketed". Again, who would even attempt this narrative? I think I can smell the desperation. Do you have any other whoppers to contribute?
    • He was injured but has returned and he decided not to play baseball this year.
    • There's some truth to that.......some.
    • The AD's job is to win in football. Everything else is window dressing. If the football team is winning the rest can go up in smoke. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...