Jump to content

Bridge City 11 Silsbee 4/FINAL

WOSgrad

By WOSgrad
in High School Baseball

 Share

Recommended Posts

STiger85

STiger85

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, AggiesAreWe said:

11 runs on just 5 hits? Had to more than just 3 errors or there were several base on balls.

12 walks issued by Silsbee pitchers. Hard to over come that plus the three errors, not going to win many games like that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rake1

Rake1

Posted
Posted

Exactly like I said earlier "BC made their hits count". BC also pitched better too. Not exactly sure where the previously mentioned box score came from but the scoreboard last night had BC with 8 hits as did Gamechanger. I understand their are discrepancies between the way folks score certain things but that had to be mentioned just for the sake of argument. And just because some want to call it a "little league box score" we can add into it that 1 of Silsbee's 4 total runs scored via a passed ball as well.  You can take the box score and twist any way you want it, I do it all the time myself so I get it. End of the day one team played better than the other and took advantage of their opportunity. 

 

Rake1

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • WOSgrad changed the title to Bridge City 11 Silsbee 4/FINAL
HOTROD309

HOTROD309

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Rake1 said:

Exactly like I said earlier "BC made their hits count". BC also pitched better too. Not exactly sure where the previously mentioned box score came from but the scoreboard last night had BC with 8 hits as did Gamechanger. I understand their are discrepancies between the way folks score certain things but that had to be mentioned just for the sake of argument. And just because some want to call it a "little league box score" we can add into it that 1 of Silsbee's 4 total runs scored via a passed ball as well.  You can take the box score and twist any way you want it, I do it all the time myself so I get it. End of the day one team played better than the other and took advantage of their opportunity. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rake1

Rake1

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, HOTROD309 said:

You must be a dad on the team to be getting so defensive.. probably the dad talking shit to the kids 👍🏻Stay classy BC 

Let me help you out with something HOTROD, lots of Silsbee folks know who I am and I have plenty of friends over there. For years I have had some really good interactions with them and have a very "good natured" back and forth with AAW. In fact AAW was always very kind and complimentary to me and my son when he was playing several years ago. For you to come on here and use profanity towards me goes against everything my friends from Silsbee as well as other places stand for. Don't accuse me of anything that you don't know about. 

Rake 1

Link to comment
Share on other sites
STiger85

STiger85

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Rake1 said:

Exactly like I said earlier "BC made their hits count". BC also pitched better too. Not exactly sure where the previously mentioned box score came from but the scoreboard last night had BC with 8 hits as did Gamechanger. I understand their are discrepancies between the way folks score certain things but that had to be mentioned just for the sake of argument. And just because some want to call it a "little league box score" we can add into it that 1 of Silsbee's 4 total runs scored via a passed ball as well.  You can take the box score and twist any way you want it, I do it all the time myself so I get it. End of the day one team played better than the other and took advantage of their opportunity. 

 

Rake1

It is what it is. It didn't matter if there where eight hits or five hits, you give up twelve walks and three errors your chances of winning is not very good. Silsbee let the elements hinder them and BC didn't, it was like BC was playing with a nice new ball and Silsbee was playing with a wiped off wet ball, but hey in this district if you lose focus in any game bad things can happen in a hurry. Congrats to BC on the win and Silsbee lesson learned. It's going to be a mad dash for the playoffs in this district. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • tvc184
      It’s kinda weird…

      By tvc184 · Posted

      Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • Englebert
      It’s kinda weird…

      By Englebert · Posted

      You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • UT alum
      It’s kinda weird…

      By UT alum · Posted

      Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • UT alum
      It’s kinda weird…

      By UT alum · Posted

      Election interference. Cheating.
    • UT alum
      It’s kinda weird…

      By UT alum · Posted

      It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...