Jump to content

Daunte Wright shot dead by officer - she thought she was using a taser


SmashMouth

Recommended Posts

It is never about right or wrong. Doesn’t matter what the perp did to get himself killed with his split second decision to resist, putting the officer in a position to make a split second decision. None of this ever matters. All that matters is black vs. white. All of this will go away after the reparation checks hit the mail box. Never fear, money solves all problems. If the problem persists, throw more money at it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Almost every one of the police on black shootings I’ve seen on the News involved resisting arrest or not following orders.  I have zero compassion for them.  Don’t give a 💩 what race they are.  These freaking people don’t have a clue what real racism is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/16/2021 at 12:39 AM, tvc184 said:

I know it is but one instance as an example but Bullets13 was doing a ride along with me on patrol one day. We went to a loud disturbance that had happened more than once and the neighbors were complaining. Due to the size of the disturbance/crowd and the repeated nature of the call, 5-6 officers showed up including me.

We did everything we could to peaceably quiet things down and try to do so without making any arrests. The officers were going to write one man a citation for disorderly conduct (disturbing the peace) and going to let the rest of them go. That’s it, please sign this citation and we are out of here. Nope, it broke out into a fight, resisting arrest and officers being assaulted. I was hit several times by a female who was trying to keep me from arresting her father who ran into the garage, possibly to grab a weapon. I just shove her away and did not arrest her but she could have faced time in jail or possibly even prison.

Then as we thought we had things calmed down I believe with only one arrest after that big fight and disturbance, it started again with claims of racism by the police. One guy then charged at the officers who were trying to leave when he wanted to confront them. He was taken to the ground and arrested.  

That brought out more verbal claims of racism by the police.

As soon as I got back in the car Bullets13 talked about how the police caused none of that and I don’t want to speak for him but he probably felt the police handled it fairly well considering we were being threatened, had people resist arrest, fleeing from arrests and in a couple of cases like me, assaulted... yet we were the bad guys. I can assure you that we could have used a lot more force lawfully and taken a lot a lot more people to jail.

I know it is been one situation and it does not exonerate officers that make stupid mistakes. These kinds of things happen every day however because people think they know the law when they do not or they feel that once they are in a group they will not be held accountable with the relative safety of numbers.

I spent about 15 minutes replying to this and then my response disappeared so... Yes, it happened the way TVC says it did.  I went on approximately 40-50 ridealongs over 5 or 6 years with him, and I saw over and over that the police weren't out to bust anybody's balls, and cut breaks whenever they could.  Pretty much every tense situation I ever witnessed between police and civilians was escalated by the civilian.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
2 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:

This is the hidden content, please

It was a matter of time before this guy killed someone...democrats sure love to honor thugs.

Not the model citizen the media played him out to be. 

Cop still made a mistake......BUT, he made a choice to be in the position he was in. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, thetragichippy said:

Not the model citizen the media played him out to be. 

Cop still made a mistake......BUT, he made a choice to be in the position he was in. 

Can’t argue with that. Do you think the officer should be punished? If yes, what punishment?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,889
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cihnen
    Newest Member
    cihnen
    Joined


  • Posts

    • That’s a president? How embarrassing. 
    • Really good hire! As I stated previously on this thread, Mike T has been an essential part of WB’s success the last few years & is a student of the game & I have a ton of respect for how he goes about things as a coach. Big on teaching kids how to do things the right way to prepare them for not only basketball but the game of life. He’ll be fine there, my only question is what kind of talent does WB have returning?  Best thing about this situation for Mike T is WB will be 5A for at least the next 2 years, so he should win a lot of games & have some deep playoff runs.
    • So which coaches kid gets the QB job? Trotter or Barrier
    • A Winnie land owner (and others) sued the State of Texas after they built IH-10 a few feet higher in order to help contain storm flooding. Sure enough a hurricane hit and flooded the land. The storm improvements worked!! Unfortunately the state sacrificed several people’s properties in using the interstate highway as a dam.  Richard DeVillier tried to sue Texas under our laws and Constitution and the US Constitution under the Fifth Amendment “taking clause” (eminent domain). After a favorable ruling in the federal district court on the right to sue Texas directly, the Fifth Circuit Court in New Orleans overturned that ruling and said that the DeVlier had no authority to sue Texas directly.  On Tuesday a unanimous US Supreme Court ruled that DeVillier and others had the right to sue Texas directly under Texas law and under the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution. The case is now sent back down to the lower court. DeVillier and others have not won their lawsuits as the case has not been decided on its merits at a trial. He still has to go to prove his case. What they did win was a unanimous Supreme Court agreeing that he has the right to bring Texas to trial for taking his property with just compensation.   
    • Don't jump?!  What?!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...