Jump to content

Beaumont United 69 Richmond Foster 42/FINAL


WOSgrad

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, TxHoops said:

Impressive showing by the U!  I was nervous this was a trap game. This group has a real chance to win the whole darn thing if they stay focused. 

I've been watching g then all year. And I've said it from the jump.if there is a better 5a team I haven't seen them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • WOSgrad changed the title to Beaumont United 56 Richmond Foster 42/FINAL
20 minutes ago, dj said:

Watching Hightower with the big  guy. They're descent but I don't know if they have enough to stay with BU. The worse mistake Hightower would make if they play the big fellow on arceneaux.

Hightower is good and should be the game to see before State.  However, Lancaster is the team to beat and has strengthened their lineup even more since the season began.  
 

They have a seasoned 4 year starter high major PG (A&M signee Wade Taylor).  They have a couple of 6-5 wings who can go.   And they have 2 6-9s and a 6-10.  But I love the fight and grit of BU.  I think they can play with anyone.  I would love to see them slay 2 dragons on the way to their first State Championship.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • bullets13 changed the title to Beaumont United 69 Richmond Foster 42/FINAL

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,900
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    adline
    Newest Member
    adline
    Joined


  • Posts

    • How do you know that Harrison is not a big opportunity? I don't really know him, but maybe just maybe he is what Liberty needs. I was just wondering what you know about Harrison that doesn't make him a big opportunity. 
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • The last 2 or so minutes are so true
    • Looking back at the exact wording, it seems like you are correct and it was the concrete barriers that were the ultimate problem. I mentioned it in my last comment, even if it was just the barriers, did Texas take his property? I think a case like US v. Causby might go a long way to proving his case. Causby had an egg farm and during World War II, the US government started flying four engine heavy bombers for the war effort, low over his farm at full power. The extremely loud noise killed a bunch of his chickens and caused many of the rest of them to quit laying eggs. Even though he legally still on the property, he sued, saying that the federal government had effectively “taken” the use of his property from him. The US Supreme Court sided with him, saying that for the purposes of the Fifth Amendment, the federal government had indeed taken away the use of his property. It wasn’t intentional but that didn’t matter. It seems like this case would fall somewhere along those lines.
    • That might have added to it but it said that they intentionally raised the roadway to help it act as a dam. Even if it was the dividers and no intent, did the state “take” his property without compensation? I think that it is interesting that a local landowner fought his case all the way to the US Supreme Court and won in a unanimous decision. So while he has not won his case yet, he won the right to have his day in court and possibly heard by a jury.     
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...