Jump to content

Senate Impeachment Trial Act II


Hagar

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Hagar said:

There’s a Pandemic.   Jobs have been lost.  People are dying.  Our economy is dropping like a Phil Niekro knuckleball.  Amidst all this the Dems stop everything to impeach a guy from office who isn’t even in office.  If anyone can rationalize that, you need to post it.   As of now, it looks like the biggest bunch of 🐂💩 ever seen from a place renowned for 🐂💩.   Smdh.

Yep, don’t forget the L in pandemic hence plandemic. Parasites thrive in 💩 an DC is full of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember the extension so that they could hear witnesses? That fell through pretty quick. Wanna know why? Lindsey Graham made a motion that the first witness should be Nancy Pelosi so that she could tell everyone why security was so lax on 1-6-21. All of a sudden, they decided that witnesses didn’t need to be heard. Ah, the dims master all the tricks to protect each other. It’s not about right or wrong, it’s simply about power and control. Anyone who doesn’t see that is an embarrassment to Americans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, baddog said:

Remember the extension so that they could hear witnesses? That fell through pretty quick. Wanna know why? Lindsey Graham made a motion that the first witness should be Nancy Pelosi so that she could tell everyone why security was so lax on 1-6-21. All of a sudden, they decided that witnesses didn’t need to be heard. Ah, the dims master all the tricks to protect each other. It’s not about right or wrong, it’s simply about power and control. Anyone who doesn’t see that is an embarrassment to Americans.

The CCP SQUAD which would be Cardinalbacker and his minions don’t see it.😂🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The relentless dims can’t get an impeachment conviction twice now. That pesky document called the constitution keeps getting in the way. Some will brag that Trump is the only president to be impeached twice, like that’s a smear on his record. I think the fact that he beat these sorry dims TWICE says it all. So outnumbered and really against all odds, Trump prevails. Good vs. Evil.....good wins every time!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, 5GallonBucket said:

Hopefully kamala will find herself dealing with an impeachment in 2022.

dems done opened a can of worms 

R s better bring the heat

The R’s need to learn to be as evil and spiteful as their Dim counterparts.  It might be a hard pill to swallow, but they need to start stooping to the D’s level!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Reagan said:

Strange:  He admits it's un-Constitutional what they were doing but voted for it anyway.  He needs to go!  BTW --  the Louisiana Sen that voted for it needs to go also.  Where are you Bobby Jindal?  

This is the hidden content, please

An excellent example of the lack of intelligence in our Congress.  The House and Senate are full of these types.  When historians look back at this group of alleged “leaders”, they have to be in awe.  😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, baddog said:

Well, we had seven republicans vote to convict. In the end, it wasn’t enough. Still, they were willing to cross political lines to vote for what they feel (or there could be some other reason). Anyhow, how many dims voted to acquit? That’s what I’m talking about.

That’s the thing the Media & public forget.  They get bombarded with, “only 7 R voted guilty”.   But conveniently forget that no Dems voted not guilty.   They all vote like the DNC tells them too.  That includes WVA Joe Manchin, despite all his bluster.  Runs his jibs, but in a close vote, he’s always with the DNC.

Jmo, but if they don’t follow the line, they will end up like Seth Rich.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,926
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Newest Member
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Joined



  • Posts

    • That there’s not a single thread on the fact that the Republican nominee is on trial for paying off a porn star with whom he had an affair while the future First Lady was carrying said nominee’s child.    I remember back when the dirty, no-good Dems sacked Gary Hart over something similar. Same thing with John Edwards and later Anthony Weiner.    But y’all keep pretending God is on your side, lol. 
    • I hear what you’re saying, BUT… that hammers the hell out of poor people and the ones with multiple properties don’t eat any more than the poor ones. In fact, you’d basically just be taxing a lot of peoples’ EBT payments. The government  can’t get ahead by taxing what they’re already borrowing to give to people.    I think well off people should pay more… but the scale as it exists is broken.    For the sake of argument, my mom’s house in Groves is valued at $125k. 2/1/1 on a slab.  Her tax bill is $850/year. Without exemptions, her bill would be 3200. It’s right on JCAD’s website. The problem is this…. If someone tries to rent out an identical house, they’d expect to get, what… $1200/month? If you take into account that homeowners/windstorm/flood is a minimum of another $2k per year, you’d need $5k a year just to cover the taxes and insurance. That’s four months (1/3 of the year) just to cover those costs, not counting a potential mortgage payment. But then everybody cries about how expensive rents are… you can’t tax the hell out of non-homestead property to make up for gifts given to homeowners in the form of big tax cuts. It just doesn’t work.    Ten acres in Lumberton? I’ve got a buddy with 10 acres in Lumberton on HWY 69. Prime property… it’s his retirement plan. Sale it one day and cash in. The CAD decided that it no longer qualifies for a special use valuation (timber) and stripped his “exemption.” His 2023 tax bill jumped from $25 to $22,000…. It’s insane.  
    • I’m curious what happened… they aren’t even in full pads yet. 
    • They’re going to have win almost all remaining games and get finals of tournament to think about an at-large. When LU was in the WAC, Grand Canyon got an at-large after New Mexico St came out of nowhere to win conference tournament. Grand Canyon had a dang good resume that year. It can happen, but resume wise isn’t in their favor.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...