Jump to content

Senate Impeachment Trial Act II


Hagar

Recommended Posts

Pelosi, and the House, voted to impeach Trump without anything resembling a trial.  No investigation into the riot, simply what has happened for the last four years, Orange man bad, impeach.   Justice Roberts has recuse himself.  Anyone wonder why?   Maybe he knows it’s unconstitutional?   Fact is, evidence has been found by law enforcement to indicate the Jan 6 riot was planned well in advance.   If so, it will (again) expose Pelosi, and the House Democrats for the partisan loons they are.

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Hagar changed the title to Senate Impeachment Trial Act II
5 hours ago, Hagar said:

Pelosi, and the House, voted to impeach Trump without anything resembling a trial.  No investigation into the riot, simply what has happened for the last four years, Orange man bad, impeach.   Justice Roberts has recuse himself.  Anyone wonder why?   Maybe he knows it’s unconstitutional?   Fact is, evidence has been found by law enforcement to indicate the Jan 6 riot was planned well in advance.   If so, it will (again) expose Pelosi, and the House Democrats for the partisan loons they are.

This is the hidden content, please

It was planned in advance, and the FBI knew it.  All planned by the Democrats to go after Trump one final time!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Hagar said:

Pelosi, and the House, voted to impeach Trump without anything resembling a trial.  No investigation into the riot, simply what has happened for the last four years, Orange man bad, impeach.   Justice Roberts has recuse himself.  Anyone wonder why?   Maybe he knows it’s unconstitutional?   Fact is, evidence has been found by law enforcement to indicate the Jan 6 riot was planned well in advance.   If so, it will (again) expose Pelosi, and the House Democrats for the partisan loons they are.

This is the hidden content, please

This is clearly illegal.  So, why do they continue to press it?  For one simple reason -- they are still scared of Trump!  What else could it be?

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PAMFAM10 said:

If the FBI knew in advance of a riot. Did they not inform trump? Then why with that knowledge would he encourage his followers. 
 

Don’t just impeach throw him under the jail. 
 

Treason 

Should Joe and Hunter be thrown under the jail as well?  Should biden have impeachment proceedings began in him for his dealings with Ukraine?  Can you show me where Trump encouraged someone to storm the Capitol?  I bet you can’t.  Treason, that’s laughable!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, PAMFAM10 said:

If the FBI knew in advance of a riot. Did they not inform trump? Then why with that knowledge would he encourage his followers. 
 

Don’t just impeach throw him under the jail. 
 

Treason 

Who said they knew in advance? This laughable impeachment gets you all tingly but you are willing to overlook so many things that are much worse. You have no principles..... more of a whichever way the wind blows, as long as you can attempt to nail  Trump. Pitiful. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, SmashMouth said:

I’m sure they’re smart, but Trump’s lawyers are not very good public speakers. Embarrassing. Did you see the second one holding the top of his combover when he tilted his head back to drink water?

This is the hidden content, please

Here's the reason...I'm with you though, kinda strange.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Realville said:

Imagine having a "trial" where the "judge" had already voted to convict the defendant? That's what happens in banana republics, third world dictatorships and now the United States Senate. SAD and PATHETIC!!

It’s being done according to the Constitution, sir. A Senate trial and a trial under the criminal justice system are two distinctly different things. Your conflation of the two is disingenuous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, PAMFAM10 said:

If the FBI knew in advance of a riot. Did they not inform trump? Then why with that knowledge would he encourage his followers. 
 

Don’t just impeach throw him under the jail. 
 

Treason 

The same FBI that spied on his campaign and pushed the Russia Hoax. I think the FBI and the DOJ needs to be put on trail for treason. Your that fool that needs the government to save you from yourself. Your Kindergarten post is null an void. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Realville said:

The same FBI that spied on his campaign and pushed the Russia Hoax. I think the FBI and the DOJ needs to be put on trail for treason. Your that fool that needs the government to save you from yourself. Your Kindergarten post is null an void. 

DOJ and FBI are on the trail of treason. The trail Trump blazed sending his followers to do his dirty work. Did you really think he was going to walk down to the Capitol with them? P.T. Barnum was a rookie compared to trump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, UT alum said:

It’s being done according to the Constitution, sir. A Senate trial and a trial under the criminal justice system are two distinctly different things. Your conflation of the two is disingenuous.

Yeah just like the election where different identities under the State Legislatures changed voting laws where it specifically states in the constitution that State Legislatures are the only ones authorized to change voting laws. You don’t get to go by the constitution when’s it’s convenient for you. That’s why Texas sued the swing states that didn’t follow the constitution in regards to the election. The fool (Leahy) in charge of this ridiculous 2nd impeachment voted to impeach Trump in the 1st fake impeachment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, UT alum said:

DOJ and FBI are on the trail of treason. The trail Trump blazed sending his followers to do his dirty work. Did you really think he was going to walk down to the Capitol with them? P.T. Barnum was a rookie compared to trump.

Your ignorance to what truly went down on the 6th of January is blinding. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, UT alum said:

It’s being done according to the Constitution, sir. A Senate trial and a trial under the criminal justice system are two distinctly different things. Your conflation of the two is disingenuous.

I beg to differ.  Impeachment is there to remove civil servants.  Trump is now a private citizen.  They are trying to inflict as much pain on him as they can.  I did hear shumer say that they want to make it were Trump can't ever run again.  But, why bother if he's so "unpopular?"  Like I've said before:  They are scared of him!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

The left planned the attack that the right actually did.

 

Makes sense.  Got it.  

I’m sure it was ultimately a majority of Trump supporters that were involved. I’m just saying that you can’t blame Trump for it. If they want to make an example of someone, arrest and prosecute the actors. I’m pretty open-minded, and my opinion is that he did not know-fully and willfully incite a riot or a break in of the Capitol on 1/6/21.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SmashMouth said:

I’m sure it was ultimately a majority of Trump supporters that were involved. I’m just saying that you can’t blame Trump for it. If they want to make an example of someone, arrest and prosecute the actors. I’m pretty open-minded, and my opinion is that he did not know-fully and willfully incite a riot or a break in of the Capitol on 1/6/21.  

That's the thing... it should be hashed out in a trial, but the evidence won't matter, it's going to go along party lines.  Ds will vote to convict whether they believe he actually incited the riot, and Rs will vote to acquit regardless of the facts presented.  

I think if he's tried federally on criminal charges we might see some sort of clearer indication of where culpability lies.  

My OPINION is that his actions did lead to what eventually happened.  Back in 2000 I felt the same way about the endless recounts-like they'd lead to bigger problems.  I'd been saying for a couple of months that if Trump didn't let go of his assertions, people would die, and that's exactly what happened. The real question for me is whether or not the trio of Rudy, Jr, and the Don encouraged people to go down and do what was done.  I lean more towards his words encouraged/excited... but that's just me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the FBI and other law enforcement agencies knew in advance, which I suspect they did, why wasn’t there more security?   Because the “powers that be” wanted a cluster fudge.  My guess, the Left planned this.  Funded it, to have agitators lead the crowd right where they went, and cause what happened.  Why?   To do exactly what’s happening now.  Jmo 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, baddog said:

Who said they knew in advance? This laughable impeachment gets you all tingly but you are willing to overlook so many things that are much worse. You have no principles..... more of a whichever way the wind blows, as long as you can attempt to nail  Trump. Pitiful. 

WTH you talking bout.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, PAMFAM10 said:

WTH you talking bout.

You want to bury Trump for supposedly inciting a riot, while Maxine Watters, Chuck Schumer, and Bernie Sanders all incited  riots, but they all get a pass from you...... no principles whatsoever. That better? Always have to spell it out for you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,932
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Newest Member
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...