Jump to content

CHUCK LANGSTON HIRED AS NEW HC AT WEST BROOK!


Reagan

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Reagan said:

Why do you think this would be?

The last few head football hires and the applicant list.

United hired Graham, who graduated from Central. Last time West Brook was open, they hired Peevey who was on staff. Central hired Jeff Nelson, who had been the head coach at Ozen previously and is a BCP grad.

I’d say the last 3 hires all had ties in some way. 3 or so current West Brook coaches are on that list, plus some Beaumont natives. One could make the argument that the probability is high.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/13/2021 at 4:19 PM, ChandlerLancaster said:

They running out of them based how long the hire taking lol

This is exactly why Jackson keeps giving Beaumont football these loser coaches. He waits so long and then hire a BS coach that he has ties to. How hard is it to pick a head coach with a winning record or an assistant coach from a program that consistently wins? SMDH...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Kowboy98 said:

Whomever Westlake DC is would be awesome. But Jackson scares me sometimes lol

Jackson only hires football coaches that have established themselves as losers. Just look at the coaches he's picked resumés. They all have lost more than they have won. SMDH...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Yeoj said:

Jackson only hires football coaches that have established themselves as losers. Just look at the coaches he's picked resumés. They all have lost more than they have won. SMDH...

Could this individual be like some bosses and not choose anyone that will outshine the him?   I've seen bosses choose people under them that are not as smart as they are.  I'm sure we've all seen it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • WOSgrad changed the title to CHUCK LANGSTON HIRED AS NEW HC AT WEST BROOK!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,926
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Newest Member
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Joined



  • Posts

    • That there’s not a single thread on the fact that the Republican nominee is on trial for paying off a porn star with whom he had an affair while the future First Lady was carrying said nominee’s child.    I remember back when the dirty, no-good Dems sacked Gary Hart over something similar. Same thing with John Edwards and later Anthony Weiner.    But y’all keep pretending God is on your side, lol. 
    • I hear what you’re saying, BUT… that hammers the hell out of poor people and the ones with multiple properties don’t eat any more than the poor ones. In fact, you’d basically just be taxing a lot of peoples’ EBT payments. The government  can’t get ahead by taxing what they’re already borrowing to give to people.    I think well off people should pay more… but the scale as it exists is broken.    For the sake of argument, my mom’s house in Groves is valued at $125k. 2/1/1 on a slab.  Her tax bill is $850/year. Without exemptions, her bill would be 3200. It’s right on JCAD’s website. The problem is this…. If someone tries to rent out an identical house, they’d expect to get, what… $1200/month? If you take into account that homeowners/windstorm/flood is a minimum of another $2k per year, you’d need $5k a year just to cover the taxes and insurance. That’s four months (1/3 of the year) just to cover those costs, not counting a potential mortgage payment. But then everybody cries about how expensive rents are… you can’t tax the hell out of non-homestead property to make up for gifts given to homeowners in the form of big tax cuts. It just doesn’t work.    Ten acres in Lumberton? I’ve got a buddy with 10 acres in Lumberton on HWY 69. Prime property… it’s his retirement plan. Sale it one day and cash in. The CAD decided that it no longer qualifies for a special use valuation (timber) and stripped his “exemption.” His 2023 tax bill jumped from $25 to $22,000…. It’s insane.  
    • I’m curious what happened… they aren’t even in full pads yet. 
    • They’re going to have win almost all remaining games and get finals of tournament to think about an at-large. When LU was in the WAC, Grand Canyon got an at-large after New Mexico St came out of nowhere to win conference tournament. Grand Canyon had a dang good resume that year. It can happen, but resume wise isn’t in their favor.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...