Jump to content

Question: Why is it when you Google Antifa.com Joe Biden’s White House.Gov comes up?


Realville

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

That doesn't matter.  

When a candidate is so repulsive that a majority of people vote for a senile person and a communist, you KNOW that the candidate was a genuine piece of trash. 

How can that not matter and not what happened.

Want to your new savior’s job killing actions? You can’t. That’s why you keep bringing up Trump.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

Trump would still be president if he knew how to act.  But instead of holding Trump to task whenever he insulted, ridiculed, threatened, etc... his loyalists would say "but look at the economy."  Newsflash.  There's more to life than the economy.  A lot of people don't care... but they DO care about voting for someone who insults their gender, race, culture, etc.... And they won't vote for that person.  I think the fact that "good Christian" people would refuse to condemn Trump's behavior was a huge turnoff to a lot of people.  

People didn't vote for Biden.... they voted against Trump.  That's a complete fact.  If Trump was so repugnant with his behavior that he DROVE a majority of Americans to vote against him, that's saying something bad about him... not about the people who refused to support him.

Honesty, conservatives don't get to talk about Antifa or BLM after exhibiting the same exact behavior (or worse) at the Capitol on 1/6.  

Anyone that is paying attention to the economy should have voted for Trump.

You can't seem to get it through your head that it's possible many folks disapproved of Trump's behavior but knew voting for the alternative would be MUCH, MUCH worse...you just can't get past your feelings.

Same exact behavior...lol, except they didn't take over cities and riot for nine months...and still going.

This is the hidden content, please

 

Not to worry though, your groupies are loving your nonsense.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CardinalBacker said:

Trump would still be president if he knew how to act.  But instead of holding Trump to task whenever he insulted, ridiculed, threatened, etc... his loyalists would say "but look at the economy."  Newsflash.  There's more to life than the economy.  A lot of people don't care... but they DO care about voting for someone who insults their gender, race, culture, etc.... And they won't vote for that person.  I think the fact that "good Christian" people would refuse to condemn Trump's behavior was a huge turnoff to a lot of people.  

People didn't vote for Biden.... they voted against Trump.  That's a complete fact.  If Trump was so repugnant with his behavior that he DROVE a majority of Americans to vote against him, that's saying something bad about him... not about the people who refused to support him.

Honesty, conservatives don't get to talk about Antifa or BLM after exhibiting the same exact behavior (or worse) at the Capitol on 1/6.  

I don’t think we are on the same page here. I’m not talking about people who voted for Trump or president biden.

I’m talking about the politicians who did absolutely nothing to stop the violence that was taking place. People lost everything, sometimes even their lives. Historical artifacts were destroyed. People were being attacked in their vehicles. Parts of cities were being taken over and the politicians did nothing to stop these actions. Why, because it didn’t affect them.  They didn’t care. Some politicians actually urged for the violence to continue and helped bail people out of jail.  Then when the capitol building was breached the politicians felt threatened. The same way citizens felt for much of the last 9 months. So, since the politicians feel threatened they must do something. We must stop this behavior, this cannot take place. What a bunch of crap!!! Now president biden kills 50,000 jobs. Why, because he doesn’t care about those people. It’s not hitting close enough to home for him and his people so no big deal.

And yes, conservatives have every right to talk about antifa and blm. The conservatives saw what was allowed, took a page out the liberal playbook and are now being punished for it. Like I said earlier, why did the politicians allow so much violence from antifa and blm but do nothing until someone returned the favor on them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,899
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    gosikij
    Newest Member
    gosikij
    Joined


  • Posts

    • How do you know that Harrison is not a big opportunity? I don't really know him, but maybe just maybe he is what Liberty needs. I was just wondering what you know about Harrison that doesn't make him a big opportunity. 
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • The last 2 or so minutes are so true
    • Looking back at the exact wording, it seems like you are correct and it was the concrete barriers that were the ultimate problem. I mentioned it in my last comment, even if it was just the barriers, did Texas take his property? I think a case like US v. Causby might go a long way to proving his case. Causby had an egg farm and during World War II, the US government started flying four engine heavy bombers for the war effort, low over his farm at full power. The extremely loud noise killed a bunch of his chickens and caused many of the rest of them to quit laying eggs. Even though he legally still on the property, he sued, saying that the federal government had effectively “taken” the use of his property from him. The US Supreme Court sided with him, saying that for the purposes of the Fifth Amendment, the federal government had indeed taken away the use of his property. It wasn’t intentional but that didn’t matter. It seems like this case would fall somewhere along those lines.
    • That might have added to it but it said that they intentionally raised the roadway to help it act as a dam. Even if it was the dividers and no intent, did the state “take” his property without compensation? I think that it is interesting that a local landowner fought his case all the way to the US Supreme Court and won in a unanimous decision. So while he has not won his case yet, he won the right to have his day in court and possibly heard by a jury.     
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...