Jump to content

Silsbee at LCM


ST413

Recommended Posts

Just received word that there will only be one game tonight due to Silsbee varsity having to quarantine. Silsbee will be sending what they have (a mix of JV and 9th teams) to play the varsity game. Silsbee did not want to forfeit. They will also have to do the same next Tuesday for home game vs. Vidor.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AggiesAreWe said:

Just received word that there will only be one game tonight due to Silsbee varsity having to quarantine. Silsbee will be sending what they have (a mix of JV and 9th teams) to play the varsity game. Silsbee did not want to forfeit. They will also have to do the same next Tuesday for home game vs. Vidor.

 

And here is the hazard or my making a Silsbee vs field bet before district started 😳

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TxHoops said:

And here is the hazard or my making a Silsbee vs field bet before district started 😳

Yep.

I never liked this districts covid protocol of making a team forfeit if they could not field a varsity team. Vidor having to forfeit their first district game this season was so bogus. Particularly since the week following was a week of non-district games and could have been made up then. Also, other districts are revamping schedules to avoid having teams forfeit. Why can't this district? UIL has allowed three games per week now just to try to help in these matters.

I can understand the time crunch when districts are in the 2nd half of play but it makes no sense to forfeit games this early in the season when you have time to make them up.

But, precedent has been made with Vidor having to forfeit a game. So teams will just have to make do when they encounter these issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AggiesAreWe said:

Just received word that there will only be one game tonight due to Silsbee varsity having to quarantine. Silsbee will be sending what they have (a mix of JV and 9th teams) to play the varsity game. Silsbee did not want to forfeit. They will also have to do the same next Tuesday for home game vs. Vidor.

 

Noooooooooo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

Yep.

I never liked this districts covid protocol of making a team forfeit if they could not field a varsity team. Vidor having to forfeit their first district game this season was so bogus. Particularly since the week following was a week of non-district games and could have been made up then. Also, other districts are revamping schedules to avoid having teams forfeit. Why can't this district? UIL has allowed three games per week now just to try to help in these matters.

I can understand the time crunch when districts are in the 2nd half of play but it makes no sense to forfeit games this early in the season when you have time to make them up.

But, precedent has been made with Vidor having to forfeit a game. So teams will just have to make do when they encounter these issues.

Completely agree.  The Vidor ruling was beyond ridiculous.   But you’re right - once that set the precedent, there’s no going back.  Hard to imagine what they were thinking when so many other districts are doing makeups.
 

The silver lining, if there is one, is you draw the two weakest teams in the district for these two games.  However, when you had so many youngsters already up on varsity, it’s still a hard hill to climb.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Tigers94 said:

Well there goes district 😞

How bad is Vidor? Maybe, just maybe, we can pull that one off and come away tied for first place.

 

How is potentially losing tonight's game a loss of the district title?

Silsbee can lose the game but still win district. They could lose two games and still be #1 seed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

How is potentially losing tonight's game a loss of the district title?

Silsbee can lose the game but still win district. They could lose two games and still be #1 seed.

Assuming they lose the next two games, they could still win out right if they beat Lumberton again, so I guess you're right.

Still, these boys can't get caught slipping at all against any team when they get back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...