Jump to content

West Orange-Stark 66 Silsbee 74/FINAL


WOSgrad

Recommended Posts

Just now, Kountzer said:

The game is being shown on you tube.  No commentary.  You gotta figure it out yourself.  I tuned in  in the 2nd qtr.

I could not tell which team was which for a minute or two. WOS looks like the the more polished team to me.  Silsbee making some sloppy passes.  Perhaps it is a more experienced team, WOS, playing a young team, Silsbee.  #. 23 for WOS is good.

Post that link!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • AggiesAreWe changed the title to West Orange-Stark 66 Silsbee 74/FINAL

Silsbee is always gonna get the best effort of other teams. They need to understand that. All the more reason to bury an opponent when you have them down like early tonight. Wouldn't be surprised if a lot of games are like this. Get caught slipping and we may lose one.

Had some uncharacteristic turnovers right when it looked like we were gonna pull away (again), and most every time WOS turned that into points. It's just youth showing. They'll learn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My Mustangs gave Silsbee a taste of that pressure.  It was a hard fought game by a pretty young Mustangs team that have a lot coming back and they just got into Coach Wilson's system.  You guys have a good Tigers squad that is young but I wouldn't sleep on my Mustangs.  I keep telling you guys these boys play hard for Wilson, don't be suprised if they get hot and go on a run.  Good game Tigers, I'm glad my Mustangs are playing tough on the hardwood again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

Silsbee had 25 turnovers last night.

Youth really showed. Several poor shot selections compounded with the turnovers kept this game close.

Silsbee led the entire game. I would not be surprised if this is the same result at WO-S.

They seemed to have trouble with the full court pressure. Lots of lazy lob passes trying to break the press led to many turnovers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DXTR said:

They seemed to have trouble with the full court pressure. Lots of lazy lob passes trying to break the press led to many turnovers. 

That and just not good court vision or communication. Several times the young Tigers got the ball stole from them from behind.

I was expecting Silsbee to take a few losses in district this year and they still may. But I thought it would be in the first half of district. This team will continue to improve and getting them later in season will be tough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,935
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Actually I wasn’t responding to your comment. It was funny. I was using your comment to take issue with baddog’s comparison. 😎
    • I mean the baseball kids aren’t even doing football after school, they go to baseball… baseball kids get about a hour during the period. 
    • That is yet to be determined in trial. ”Taking” in the Fifth Amendment doesn’t mean ownership, title changing hands, etc. A government can “take” your property without “taking” your properties.  That has been true.  This issue is, did Texas take the property under the Fifth Amendment and subsequent Supreme Court rulings and not the dictionary definition of “taking”. As always in the law, definitions matter. 
    • Wrong again. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   The day that Trump took office, our nation debt stood at 19.9 Trillion dollars (End of Q4, 2016).  After his tax cuts (without corresponding cuts in spending), the national debt stood at 23.2 Trillion dollars at the end of Q1 of 2020 that was the Start of COVID, FYI... Or a total increase in debt of almost 17% during Trump's first three years (and one quarter) in office.  At the end of his reign (with COVID spending for which Trump himself signed off on) was at 27.7 Trillion Dollars.  That's a 39% increase in the National Debt while Trump was in office.  For further reference, Biden inherited a 27.7 Trillion dollar debt to start.  At the end of Q4 2023, the debt stands at 34 Trillion.  That's an increase of 19% over the first three years. I know that math and facts hurt your feelings, but Trump was horrible for the country before he allowed "them Dirty Democrats to shut down the economy."  Anybody that says "Trump was good for the country" doesn't know the first thing about micro/macro economics or the effects of deficit spending.  Trump hurt us like no other president, period.  Anybody that says "Trump was good for the economy" is actually stating for the rest of us with some sense "I don't know what I'm talking about."
    • But of course you wouldn’t understand the saying. You’re so clever. Your education precedes you. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...