Jump to content

Nederland @ United


Recommended Posts

‘Control the Tempo’ is gonna be easier said than done and is also a double edged sword.  Teams have tried this as far as slowing the tempo down.  Crazy thing is This team has very good shooters as well as athletes, so they’ll thrive in the half court game.  As far as speeding up the tempo, that’s a fast way to find yourself down by 20 early.
 

Beat bet is to roll out the ball and play YOUR game better than BU plays their game and see what happens.  

Two really good coaches here so you know they’ll be a chest match at some point.  
 

I don’t think Nederland has the personnel to be able to battle  BU for 4 Quarters and this one will probably be a 25 pt win...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, AxeEm said:

Who are United’s top players?   What does Ned have to do to win?  Where is this one at? 

Really revolves around our 3 headed monster where either one can explode for 30.  6’7” Jr Arceneaux, 6’4” Soph Yates, and 6’5” Soph Porchia.  
 

My previous post states what I think Nederland needs to do to win.

At United Gym Tuesday at 7.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, locker room talk said:

I agree, 2 good coaches.  Even though I see United winning, I never count English out.  I remember him beating K Perkins when he was at Vidor.  He always has something up his sleeve.   I hope Ned makes it respectful.   

He did NOT beat a Perkins lead team.  He did beat a strong Ozen team, but Perkins was in the NBA when this happened...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, locker room talk said:

He actually beat a Perkins led team when he was at Vidor.  May have beat them twice that year.  Scouts were at game to watch Perkins at their own little table at Ozen.  Vidor lit it up from the 3.  Fact.

Vidor made 17 3’s that game, but still lost to Perkins. It was the following year vidor beat Ozen 3 times 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, locker room talk said:

He actually beat a Perkins led team when he was at Vidor.  May have beat them twice that year.  Scouts were at game to watch Perkins at their own little table at Ozen.  Vidor lit it up from the 3.  Fact.

Perkins lost once in HS and it wasn’t to Vidor. It was to Chris Bosh in the state championship 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TexazBall said:

Perkins lost once in HS and it wasn’t to Vidor. It was to Chris Bosh in the state championship 

Remember, Perk and Ozen went undefeated his Sophmore year.  He had at least 1 loss when they lost to Chris Bosh and Dallas Lincoln and he lost another year early in the playoffs I believe.  So I want to say he at least lost about 3 or 4 times...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yearly this has become somewhat of a rivalry game between two good programs with top shelf coaching. United (13-0) hasnt played a game in 14 days. Nederland (13-0) last played 5 days ago. This could be a factor in the margin of the of the final score. United is humble enough to prepare and humble enough to perform. Looking forward to a fair called injury free game. Lace them up and let it do what it do...jmo...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,900
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    adline
    Newest Member
    adline
    Joined



  • Posts

    • How do you know that Harrison is not a big opportunity? I don't really know him, but maybe just maybe he is what Liberty needs. I was just wondering what you know about Harrison that doesn't make him a big opportunity. 
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • The last 2 or so minutes are so true
    • Looking back at the exact wording, it seems like you are correct and it was the concrete barriers that were the ultimate problem. I mentioned it in my last comment, even if it was just the barriers, did Texas take his property? I think a case like US v. Causby might go a long way to proving his case. Causby had an egg farm and during World War II, the US government started flying four engine heavy bombers for the war effort, low over his farm at full power. The extremely loud noise killed a bunch of his chickens and caused many of the rest of them to quit laying eggs. Even though he legally still on the property, he sued, saying that the federal government had effectively “taken” the use of his property from him. The US Supreme Court sided with him, saying that for the purposes of the Fifth Amendment, the federal government had indeed taken away the use of his property. It wasn’t intentional but that didn’t matter. It seems like this case would fall somewhere along those lines.
    • That might have added to it but it said that they intentionally raised the roadway to help it act as a dam. Even if it was the dividers and no intent, did the state “take” his property without compensation? I think that it is interesting that a local landowner fought his case all the way to the US Supreme Court and won in a unanimous decision. So while he has not won his case yet, he won the right to have his day in court and possibly heard by a jury.     
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...