Jump to content

Crosby 58 Beaumont United 72/FINAL


Recommended Posts

  • AggiesAreWe changed the title to Crosby 58 Beaumont United 72/FINAL
53 minutes ago, Yeoj said:

No way does some two sport athlete going to come and make this Crosby team competitive against United. Hell Yates didn't even have a good game. Next time United by 25+.

Lol competitive?!? They lucky green called the dogs off for them to even keep it under 25 this time...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Yeoj said:

No way does some two sport athlete going to come and make this Crosby team competitive against United. Hell Yates didn't even have a good game. Next time United by 25+.

They will make it a better game. But they want beat them. 13,3,11 for Crosby didn't have a chance against this press.too long and athletic. But it will be closer next time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BH85 said:

Making excuses ahead of time?  United should roll in district. 

No excuses. I know BU won’t lose in this district, no disrespect.  But over the years of following out local teams, I know how the refereeing changes the farther west you go.  I’m sure you know what I’m talking about...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

No excuses. I know BU won’t lose in this district, no disrespect.  But over the years of following out local teams, I know how the refereeing changes the farther west you go.  I’m sure you know what I’m talking about...

They say the same stuff about going east. I think all the chapters have good and bad refs, you just have to make adjustments. Of course I've seen fans complain about refs without seeing the dumb fouls, missed layups, and poor defense. Refs are either too tight or too loose for some teams 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BH85 said:

They say the same stuff about going east. I think all the chapters have good and bad refs, you just have to make adjustments. Of course I've seen fans complain about refs without seeing the dumb fouls, missed layups, and poor defense. Refs are either too tight or too loose for some teams 

Ok.  I can agree with that.  Didn’t think about it that way initially...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, BH85 said:

They say the same stuff about going east. I think all the chapters have good and bad refs, you just have to make adjustments. Of course I've seen fans complain about refs without seeing the dumb fouls, missed layups, and poor defense. Refs are either too tight or too loose for some teams 

This is very true.

Some officials (not all) seem to have an area bias when it comes to doing a game with a team outside their coverage area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,926
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Newest Member
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Joined


  • Posts

    • That there’s not a single thread on the fact that the Republican nominee is on trial for paying off a porn star with whom he had an affair while the future First Lady was carrying said nominee’s child.    I remember back when the dirty, no-good Dems sacked Gary Hart over something similar. Same thing with John Edwards and later Anthony Weiner.    But y’all keep pretending God is on your side, lol. 
    • I hear what you’re saying, BUT… that hammers the hell out of poor people and the ones with multiple properties don’t eat any more than the poor ones. In fact, you’d basically just be taxing a lot of peoples’ EBT payments. The government  can’t get ahead by taxing what they’re already borrowing to give to people.    I think well off people should pay more… but the scale as it exists is broken.    For the sake of argument, my mom’s house in Groves is valued at $125k. 2/1/1 on a slab.  Her tax bill is $850/year. Without exemptions, her bill would be 3200. It’s right on JCAD’s website. The problem is this…. If someone tries to rent out an identical house, they’d expect to get, what… $1200/month? If you take into account that homeowners/windstorm/flood is a minimum of another $2k per year, you’d need $5k a year just to cover the taxes and insurance. That’s four months (1/3 of the year) just to cover those costs, not counting a potential mortgage payment. But then everybody cries about how expensive rents are… you can’t tax the hell out of non-homestead property to make up for gifts given to homeowners in the form of big tax cuts. It just doesn’t work.    Ten acres in Lumberton? I’ve got a buddy with 10 acres in Lumberton on HWY 69. Prime property… it’s his retirement plan. Sale it one day and cash in. The CAD decided that it no longer qualifies for a special use valuation (timber) and stripped his “exemption.” His 2023 tax bill jumped from $25 to $22,000…. It’s insane.  
    • I’m curious what happened… they aren’t even in full pads yet. 
    • They’re going to have win almost all remaining games and get finals of tournament to think about an at-large. When LU was in the WAC, Grand Canyon got an at-large after New Mexico St came out of nowhere to win conference tournament. Grand Canyon had a dang good resume that year. It can happen, but resume wise isn’t in their favor.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...