Jump to content

Carthage vs Gilmer ***4A Div. II State Championship***


Crawford

State Championship  

42 members have voted

  1. 1. Who Ya Got?

    • Gilmer Buckeyes
    • Carthage Bulldogs

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 12/18/2020 at 06:00 PM

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Bulldogs92 said:

Yep. It takes a lot more than just great players to get it done. We've had our share of those in Jasper, but one of these other components is always missing. 

I completely agree.  I think Jasper has been on the cusp a few times the last couple of years with like you said, at least one of those components missing.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BMTSoulja1 said:

Congrats to the 4a Boogieman, Carthage Bulldawgs on winning the title.  I'm sure everyone knew this was going to happen even before the season began.  

You can probably pencil them in for next year, too. There will be a few contenders and I hope we're one of them, but it's hard to imagine much drop-off from them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

Congrats to the 4a Boogieman, Carthage Bulldawgs on winning the title.  I'm sure everyone knew this was going to happen even before the season began.  

Center is in the same district, so when I saw Carthage had drop down to Div. II after winning state in Div. I, I'm like "well hell, just go ahead and hand them the district and state title." Crazy good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, NDNTime said:

100% agreed.  But I have no hesitation in saying Carthage could go 3-4 rounds deep in 5A-DII.  If in Region 3, once they ran into teams that could play tough D like Huntsville, then they may get bounced.

Agreed! I think they could definitely go a few rounds in 5A D2 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Hagar said:

Heard after the game the QB Kai Horten, and RB Mason Courtney, both signed with Tulane.   Best friends getting to play at the next level.   And ironically, Mason had 243 yds rushing & Horten had 243 yds passing.

Those are good gets for the Green Wave. Those guys will lead that team at some point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,937
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • 3 yrs ago LCM and Vidor played in Vidor for a play in game.  Game was on a Saturday and started around 1 or 2p.
    • It would shock me beyond belief if he tried to. Now, I hope and pray he appoints people that will investigate, charge, and imprison anyone found guilty of the crimes against him...including treason. I would be all for a special task force charge solely with the task of investigating crimes against Trump. Of course the Democrats will be screaming bloody murder that Trump is weaponizing the government against them. We all know the story. From a cursory standpoint, there seems to be a plethora of evidence to lock up many Democrats for a long time. Unless this is done, I see no end to destruction of our political system...and this country.
    • There is a difference, but I wouldn't at all put it past Trump to do so if he had the infrastructure in place to get away with it like the Dems currently do.  With the amount of effort he's invested in ruining those republicans who've opposed him, it wouldn't surprise me one bit.
    • I think it will be an interesting case and could potentially come up for appeal on a different constitutional point.  The Supreme Court has ruled in the past that the government doesn’t have to take possession of property in order to take it under the meaning of the Fifth Amendment.  If they take away the enjoyment or use of the property, it is no different than physically seizing it to build a highway for example. In a lawsuit as opposed to a criminal trial, a person/plaintiff doesn’t have to prove something beyond a reasonable doubt but rather by a preponderance of evidence or “more likely” to have happened. Maybe it could be described as more likely yes than no or 51%-49%.  ”IF” it can be shown at a trial by a preponderance of evidence that Texas more likely yes than no caused the flooding with its engineering of the project, the people suing might have a case. But…. Does that alone win the case under the Fifth Amendment taking clause? I am not so sure. In US v Causby the Supreme Court ruled that the US government took a man’s property by flying airplanes over it. It was a public airport lawfully leased by the US in WWII and used to fly heavy bombers from it. Causby had an egg farm and the extremely loud noise of some airplanes under full power and sometimes at night with a landing lights being so close, it bothered and scared the family and damaged his egg farm production. Some chickens died and some quit laying eggs due to the extreme disturbances and lights at night. The Supreme Court ruled in Causby’s favor saying that the US had taken away the enjoyment and use of his land even though they didn’t physically seize it. The use of the land was hampered and that was enough for the taking clause under the Fifth Amendment. So in the IH-10 case, did Texas take away the use or enjoyment of the property?  A point of Causby was that the military bombers at a public airport was certainly for “public use”. The planes were public/taxpayers’ and the airport and lease were taxpayers’ property so the “public” definitely used it   My question in this lawsuit against Texas, even in they can prove the damage, was the damage (like in Causby) for “public use”? If not would it then not be a Fifth Amendment case but rather a state law case?  If Texas law denies such a lawsuit under state sovereignty and the families can’t prove a Fifth Amendment case of “public use”, could they prove the damages but still lose the case under state law? I haven’t read that anywhere and just thinking out loud. I could be way off base. But I think it could be interesting…..
    • Both sides...that is, everyone tries to get their people elected. Trump has not weaponized the government to bankrupt and imprison his political opponents. Night and day difference for me.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...