Jump to content

Too Early? Coogs vs. Dogs!


CowbellCoog

Recommended Posts

Who yah got next week as Nederland comes to the Jungle to take on the Cougars?

Cougars are going for a outright district championship and the Bulldogs are looking for the upset and take a share as co-champs. 

What stats you got? I haven't watched the dogs this year, only seen 2 nail biters to a failed png team, and lucky win over the aunt mound. Both of who we only allowed a combined 17 points...

 

I'll take my coogs, with a score of 42-14

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, CowbellCoog said:

Who yah got next week as Nederland comes to the Jungle to take on the Cougars?

Cougars are going for a outright district championship and the Bulldogs are looking for the upset and take a share as co-champs. 

What stats you got? I haven't watched the dogs this year, only seen 2 nail biters to a failed png team, and lucky win over the aunt mound. Both of who we only allowed a combined 17 points...

 

I'll take my coogs, with a score of 42-14

 

I don’t think it means anything, but if you compare stats on the same district opponents, Crosby scores 43 ppg. and allows 7.  Nederland scores 36 ppg. And allows 18.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, CowbellCoog said:

Who yah got next week as Nederland comes to the Jungle to take on the Cougars?

Cougars are going for a outright district championship and the Bulldogs are looking for the upset and take a share as co-champs. 

What stats you got? I haven't watched the dogs this year, only seen 2 nail biters to a failed png team, and lucky win over the aunt mound. Both of who we only allowed a combined 17 points...

 

I'll take my coogs, with a score of 42-14

 

Lucky win? Do tell....

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, dme1111 said:

Gonna be a tough one!! .  I'm taking Nederland by 7... but wouldn't be surprised to see Crosby by 14.. 

Defense PPG Crosby 15.5 Nederland 17.5 

Offense PPG Crosby 40    Nederland 33

Yea, the stats I posted above only included district games against the same opponents.  I was considering Nederland had two games cancelled and that is why I didn’t include them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CCRed said:

Yea, the stats I posted above only included district games against the same opponents.  I was considering Nederland had two games cancelled and that is why I didn’t include them. 

Either way... It should be a great game.  I think realistic odds are clearly leaning towards Crosby.  Still. Gotta take my dogs by 7 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The last opportunity Crosby had to finish as undefeated district champions was 2017. We were 9-0 and heavily favored and lost at home to New Caney 63-38. More impactful part was that loss dropping us into the D2 #2 seed which set up the 72-69 loss to PNG in bi-district. 
 

Nederland always matches up well with Crosby. They usually have just enough personnel wise and play at that slower pace that seems to complicate things for the Cougars. Crosby has been the best team in 12-5A-D2 all year and has a chance to finish off their most impressive run through district play that I can remember. Ned is trying to prove they’re the best team in the district at the end of the year. This is exactly where both teams were hoping to be when the season started. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr. Buddy Garrity said:

They have to beat BH. 

PNG facing Santa Fe next week with their chances to make/miss the playoffs is a saving grace. A TC upset of BH is unlikely, therefore causing the District more than likely to end up :

1st- Crosby 

2nd- Nederland 

3rd- Barbers Hill 

4th- PNG

... unfortunately for PNG though is FB Marshall will be their Rd. 1 opponent. Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Cougar239 said:

PNG facing Santa Fe next week with their chances to make/miss the playoffs is a saving grace. A TC upset of BH is unlikely, therefore causing the District more than likely to end up :

1st- Crosby 

2nd- Nederland 

3rd- Barbers Hill 

4th- PNG

... unfortunately for PNG though is FB Marshall will be their Rd. 1 opponent. Lol

FBM will put 70 on Png smh. And Png might not score 10pts in the process. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Cougar239 said:

PNG facing Santa Fe next week with their chances to make/miss the playoffs is a saving grace. A TC upset of BH is unlikely, therefore causing the District more than likely to end up :

1st- Crosby 

2nd- Nederland 

3rd- Barbers Hill 

4th- PNG

... unfortunately for PNG though is FB Marshall will be their Rd. 1 opponent. Lol

Crazy thing is if TC upsets BH.  TC goes in as 3 and BH gets the 4 and date with FB Marshall.   Between Crosby/Ned who would you rather play?  Houston sterling or the loser of FB willowridge/Galena park.   I’d rather win and go to bottom bracket with FB Marshall instead lose and be top half bracket with Texas High and Huntsville

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...