Jump to content

West Sabine 22 Hull-Daisetta 6/FINAL


WOSgrad

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Corona_with_Lime said:

Tigers facing a 4th and goal on the HD 6 yard line. I think :31 seconds left in 3rd but scoreboard has been on the glitch. I’m still livid about that call. Should have been 4th and 11 on their own 23 yard line. 

Must be same referees from Deweyville 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tigers take a knee and that’s the ball game. Great game West Sabine and good luck next week. You guys earned it.  I’m thinking WS go to the 3rd round with an easy win next week. 
 

Tigers - 22

Bobcats - 6

 

Final 

 

Way to play hard Cats. Made a few too many mistakes and gave up a couple big plays. We’ll be back bigger and better next year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • WOSgrad changed the title to West Sabine 22 Hull-Daisetta 6/FINAL

Really thought HD defense looked the best it has all year. There are several plays that come to mind but two big plays that stand out that really hurt HD was the 1Q fumble when HD was inside the red zone of WS and the in the 3 Q when HD fumbled inside the 15 of WS. Those were game changing plays that should have resulted in points. But regardless these kids played hard and WS got the W. So congratulations and good luck to WS. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Corona_with_Lime said:

Tigers take a knee and that’s the ball game. Great game West Sabine and good luck next week. You guys earned it.  I’m thinking WS go to the 3rd round with an easy win next week. 
 

Tigers - 22

Bobcats - 6

 

Final 

 

Way to play hard Cats. Made a few too many mistakes and gave up a couple big plays. We’ll be back bigger and better next year. 

That 3rd round game against Mart wont be pretty 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,883
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    paaro21
    Newest Member
    paaro21
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Really good hire! As I stated previously on this thread, Mike T has been an essential part of WB’s success the last few years & is a student of the game & I have a ton of respect for how he goes about things as a coach. Big on teaching kids how to do things the right way to prepare them for not only basketball but the game of life. He’ll be fine there, my only question is what kind of talent does WB have returning?  Best thing about this situation for Mike T is WB will be 5A for at least the next 2 years, so he should win a lot of games & have some deep playoff runs.
    • So which coaches kid gets the QB job? Trotter or Barrier
    • A Winnie land owner (and others) sued the State of Texas after they built IH-10 a few feet higher in order to help contain storm flooding. Sure enough a hurricane hit and flooded the land. The storm improvements worked!! Unfortunately the state sacrificed several people’s properties in using the interstate highway as a dam.  Richard DeVillier tried to sue Texas under our laws and Constitution and the US Constitution under the Fifth Amendment “taking clause” (eminent domain). After a favorable ruling in the federal district court on the right to sue Texas directly, the Fifth Circuit Court in New Orleans overturned that ruling and said that the DeVlier had no authority to sue Texas directly.  On Tuesday a unanimous US Supreme Court ruled that DeVillier and others had the right to sue Texas directly under Texas law and under the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution. The case is now sent back down to the lower court. DeVillier and others have not won their lawsuits as the case has not been decided on its merits at a trial. He still has to go to prove his case. What they did win was a unanimous Supreme Court agreeing that he has the right to bring Texas to trial for taking his property with just compensation.   
    • Don't jump?!  What?!
    • @Big girl  @UT alum     Amazing, isn't it?!  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...