Jump to content

East Chambers 42 Buna 6/FINAL

WOSgrad

By WOSgrad
in High School Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 119
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Makemineaconvertible
Makemineaconvertible

6-7 new that wasn’t rostered last year 

AggiesAreWe
AggiesAreWe

THIS!!! All the troubles that was going on at BISD at the time, I would not blame any parent for moving out to another school district. Particularly East Chambers. EC is an awesome school distric

aTmfan06
aTmfan06

I’m pretty sure the move wasn’t for athletic reasons, so let’s move on people. If the kid had moved to one of yalls schools then there would be no issue here.

SeTX_PLMR

SeTX_PLMR

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

THIS!!!

All the troubles that was going on at BISD at the time, I would not blame any parent for moving out to another school district. Particularly East Chambers. EC is an awesome school district.

But, in the cases that I suspect some of you are talking about, it was family moves that brought them to EC, not athletics.

 

BTW, I believe BISD has their act together now (or at least better than it was).

East Chambers is a great school, not just academics but athletics as well. For a small school they compete at at high level in any extra curricular activities 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
87JAG

87JAG

Posted
Posted
On 10/18/2020 at 8:40 AM, SeTX_PLMR said:

So your telling me you don't think he'd start for Central or Ozen before the merge? 

 He did the same thing from lil league up. He would have been the starter at Central. They moved because it was a better environment (for older brother).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
oldschool2

oldschool2

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, CCRanch said:

I'm probably in the minority, but I just think the schools should have to play with the kids that grew up in the community instead of kids moving in just to play sports.

There are too many situations where people relocate due to jobs, educational opportunities, divorce, etc.. you can’t punish kids with legitimate transfer reasons due to a few.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted

I see nothing wrong with kids wanting to play wherever they want to play.  I've always hated the UIL rule forcing kids to reside in the school district in order to participate in extracurricular activities.  Let them go where they want to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SmashMouth

SmashMouth

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, mrtomcat said:

I see nothing wrong with kids wanting to play wherever they want to play.  I've always hated the UIL rule forcing kids to reside in the school district in order to participate in extracurricular activities.  Let them go where they want to go.

I think they should reside in the district in which they participate, I just don’t think you have to be born and raised there like @CCRanch was stating. My dad was in the military. We moved every 2 or 3 years. Circumstances of life don’t necessarily mean you were “recruited”. This is America (for now) lol. People have a right to live where they want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
oldschool2

oldschool2

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, mrtomcat said:

I see nothing wrong with kids wanting to play wherever they want to play.  I've always hated the UIL rule forcing kids to reside in the school district in order to participate in extracurricular activities.  Let them go where they want to go.

Kids can play wherever they want to play.  Also, they aren't forced to reside anywhere.  Just no that if a kid doesn't reside in the district after moving, then they'll have to wait a calendar year to play where they want.

It's been debated several times on here, but that rule is the only viable option to ensure that UIL sports doesn't turn into one big recruit fest.  At least.. not openly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SmashMouth

SmashMouth

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, oldschool2 said:

Kids can play wherever they want to play.  Also, they aren't forced to reside anywhere.  Just no that if a kid doesn't reside in the district after moving, then they'll have to wait a calendar year to play where they want.

It's been debated several times on here, but that rule is the only viable option to ensure that UIL sports doesn't turn into one big recruit fest.  At least.. not openly. 

Not always...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
oldschool2

oldschool2

Posted
Posted
47 minutes ago, SmashMouth said:

Not always...

You mean other than with their parent/guardian?  Or in the case of a child possibly without one?

I mean that if an athlete chooses to go to a school outside of the district in which they reside, have a caregiver that is ok with it, and have a means of getting to/from said school, the UIL is NOT going to force that child to stay at the school that they live within the district boundaries.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SmashMouth

SmashMouth

Posted
Posted
30 minutes ago, oldschool2 said:

You mean other than with their parent/guardian?  Or in the case of a child possibly without one?

I mean that if an athlete chooses to go to a school outside of the district in which they reside, have a caregiver that is ok with it, and have a means of getting to/from said school, the UIL is NOT going to force that child to stay at the school that they live within the district boundaries.  

It’s up to the school district. Some require you to reside in the district in which you attend school, while others do not. That ruling is enforced by the TEA and other governing bodies; therefore, my “Not always...” comment is correct. 

From the TEA website:

Can my child attend school in District A, even though we live in District B? 

Generally, a child must attend the school district in which he or she resides. School districts can make transfer agreements to accept each others' students. Transfer arrangements may also result from wealth-sharing arrangements under Chapter 41 of the Texas Education Code. For more information, contact your school district or the TEA Division of State Funding at (512) 463-9238.

Some campuses won’t allow it while others will. It’s their choice. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Setx fan

Setx fan

Posted
Posted

If it’s just Caesar and his siblings that happened to move to Winnie a couple years back then it’s not a big deal in my opinion. If EC or any public school started having multiple kids that happen to be good athletes transfer each year or every other year then I’d probably have a problem with that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Makemineaconvertible

Makemineaconvertible

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Setx fan said:

If it’s just Caesar and his siblings that happened to move to Winnie a couple years back then it’s not a big deal in my opinion. If EC or any public school started having multiple kids that happen to be good athletes transfer each year or every other year then I’d probably have a problem with that. 

6-7 new that wasn’t rostered last year 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Makemineaconvertible

Makemineaconvertible

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, AggiesAreWe said:

Incorrect.

I know for a fact that EC has only 1 player that moved from Beaumont to Winnie this past spring that is playing for EC. That came straight from the top.

Need to get your facts straight.

Like he’s going to tell you the truth, this is coming from people who are in the program 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted
19 hours ago, oldschool2 said:

Kids can play wherever they want to play.  Also, they aren't forced to reside anywhere.  Just no that if a kid doesn't reside in the district after moving, then they'll have to wait a calendar year to play where they want.

It's been debated several times on here, but that rule is the only viable option to ensure that UIL sports doesn't turn into one big recruit fest.  At least.. not openly. 

That's exactly my issue.   Who cares who recruits who and where they go and why they go there.  What's the problem with it ?  I see no issue with it at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,924
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Newest Member
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Joined


  • Posts

    • pine curtain
      Nederland is open, Barrow Resigns

      By pine curtain · Posted

      👍. 
    • CardinalBacker
      It’s kinda weird…

      By CardinalBacker · Posted

      That there’s not a single thread on the fact that the Republican nominee is on trial for paying off a porn star with whom he had an affair while the future First Lady was carrying said nominee’s child.    I remember back when the dirty, no-good Dems sacked Gary Hart over something similar. Same thing with John Edwards and later Anthony Weiner.    But y’all keep pretending God is on your side, lol. 
    • CardinalBacker
      End Property Tax At 65?!

      By CardinalBacker · Posted

      I hear what you’re saying, BUT… that hammers the hell out of poor people and the ones with multiple properties don’t eat any more than the poor ones. In fact, you’d basically just be taxing a lot of peoples’ EBT payments. The government  can’t get ahead by taxing what they’re already borrowing to give to people.    I think well off people should pay more… but the scale as it exists is broken.    For the sake of argument, my mom’s house in Groves is valued at $125k. 2/1/1 on a slab.  Her tax bill is $850/year. Without exemptions, her bill would be 3200. It’s right on JCAD’s website. The problem is this…. If someone tries to rent out an identical house, they’d expect to get, what… $1200/month? If you take into account that homeowners/windstorm/flood is a minimum of another $2k per year, you’d need $5k a year just to cover the taxes and insurance. That’s four months (1/3 of the year) just to cover those costs, not counting a potential mortgage payment. But then everybody cries about how expensive rents are… you can’t tax the hell out of non-homestead property to make up for gifts given to homeowners in the form of big tax cuts. It just doesn’t work.    Ten acres in Lumberton? I’ve got a buddy with 10 acres in Lumberton on HWY 69. Prime property… it’s his retirement plan. Sale it one day and cash in. The CAD decided that it no longer qualifies for a special use valuation (timber) and stripped his “exemption.” His 2023 tax bill jumped from $25 to $22,000…. It’s insane.  
    • navydawg31
      Nederland is open, Barrow Resigns

      By navydawg31 · Posted

      I’m curious what happened… they aren’t even in full pads yet. 
    • TradenupBH
      Lamar Baseball 2024

      By TradenupBH · Posted

      They’re going to have win almost all remaining games and get finals of tournament to think about an at-large. When LU was in the WAC, Grand Canyon got an at-large after New Mexico St came out of nowhere to win conference tournament. Grand Canyon had a dang good resume that year. It can happen, but resume wise isn’t in their favor.

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...