Jump to content

Portland Has Fallen: Over 150 Shots Fired In The Democrat ‘Controlled’ City Over Night!


Reagan

Recommended Posts

59 minutes ago, stevenash said:

You "heard" they shot a peaceful protester?  I would be interested in something a little more substantial than you "heard" that.    I "heard" that Mr. Obama was not a U.S. citizen.  Please point me to a link that documents what you claim.   Or did you possibly just echo something you heard one of your associates utter?

The video is on multiple sites. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, stevenash said:

How did this happen if there were just peaceful protesters?

 

six
 
According to authorities, six federal officers were injured during the overnight protest, with one suffering a concussion and another taken to the hospital for burns

Time for water cannons and rubber bullets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, stevenash said:

How did this happen if there were just peaceful protesters?

 

six
 
According to authorities, six federal officers were injured during the overnight protest, with one suffering a concussion and another taken to the hospital for burns

Which night? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, stevenash said:

The time that it occurred is irrelevant.  It points out the OBVIOUS fact that there is a substantial element that is NOT peaceful.  But go ahead with your efforts to imply otherwise.  Here is another tidbit regarding "peaceful protesters"

 

This is the hidden content, please

Umm, the date of the incidents are kind of important my guy. Donavan La Bella was shot in the head with a “less leathal” bullet on July 12 while standing across the street from federal agents holding a boombox over his head. He now suffers a fractured skull. I searched near and far and couldn’t find a time a federal officer was injured before then. My guess is that a peaceful protester being shot in the head would probably raise tension which could possibly lead to more rioting and federal agents being injured. Makes sense to me but aye what do I know. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Setx fan said:

Umm, the date of the incidents are kind of important my guy. Donavan La Bella was shot in the head with a “less leathal” bullet on July 12 while standing across the street from federal agents holding a boombox over his head. He now suffers a fractured skull. I searched near and far and couldn’t find a time a federal officer was injured before then. My guess is that a peaceful protester being shot in the head would probably raise tension which could possibly lead to more rioting and federal agents being injured. Makes sense to me but aye what do I know. 

May 31-

The conversation was cut short though, because around 11:30 p.m., 

This is the hidden content, please
 some protesters were setting off fireworks and "aerial morters" at officers. Police declared the gathering an unlawful assembly a short time later.

Police used flash bangs and tear gas to disperse protesters. The group splintered into smaller groups and there were reports of vandalism and people setting fires through the early morning hours of Monday.

Twelve people were arrested, police said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stevenash said:

May 31-

The conversation was cut short though, because around 11:30 p.m., 

This is the hidden content, please
 some protesters were setting off fireworks and "aerial morters" at officers. Police declared the gathering an unlawful assembly a short time later.

Police used flash bangs and tear gas to disperse protesters. The group splintered into smaller groups and there were reports of vandalism and people setting fires through the early morning hours of Monday.

Twelve people were arrested, police said.

Local police/ federal agents. Two different situations. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Setx fan said:

Umm, the date of the incidents are kind of important my guy. Donavan La Bella was shot in the head with a “less leathal” bullet on July 12 while standing across the street from federal agents holding a boombox over his head. He now suffers a fractured skull. I searched near and far and couldn’t find a time a federal officer was injured before then. My guess is that a peaceful protester being shot in the head would probably raise tension which could possibly lead to more rioting and federal agents being injured. Makes sense to me but aye what do I know. 

If you put yourself in a place where you know there could be riots, you should come to expect that something like this could happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, BS Wildcats said:

If you put yourself in a place where you know there could be riots, you should come to expect that something like this could happen.

Texas law (with each state being different) says that if there is a riot and you remain there, you are guilty of Riot and can be charged with a B misdemeanor (up to 180 days in jail). Then it goes on to say that you can additionally be charged with the most serious crime that was committed by anyone in the riot. So if someone sets fire to a car and you are there as part of the riot, they can charge you with felony arson without having to prove that you said the fire. You fail to disperse from the scene of a riot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,937
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • 3 yrs ago LCM and Vidor played in Vidor for a play in game.  Game was on a Saturday and started around 1 or 2p.
    • It would shock me beyond belief if he tried to. Now, I hope and pray he appoints people that will investigate, charge, and imprison anyone found guilty of the crimes against him...including treason. I would be all for a special task force charged solely with the task of investigating crimes against Trump. Of course the Democrats will be screaming bloody murder that Trump is weaponizing the government against them. We all know the story. From a cursory standpoint, there seems to be a plethora of evidence to lock up many Democrats for a long time. Unless this is done, I see no end to destruction of our political system...and this country.
    • There is a difference, but I wouldn't at all put it past Trump to do so if he had the infrastructure in place to get away with it like the Dems currently do.  With the amount of effort he's invested in ruining those republicans who've opposed him, it wouldn't surprise me one bit.
    • I think it will be an interesting case and could potentially come up for appeal on a different constitutional point.  The Supreme Court has ruled in the past that the government doesn’t have to take possession of property in order to take it under the meaning of the Fifth Amendment.  If they take away the enjoyment or use of the property, it is no different than physically seizing it to build a highway for example. In a lawsuit as opposed to a criminal trial, a person/plaintiff doesn’t have to prove something beyond a reasonable doubt but rather by a preponderance of evidence or “more likely” to have happened. Maybe it could be described as more likely yes than no or 51%-49%.  ”IF” it can be shown at a trial by a preponderance of evidence that Texas more likely yes than no caused the flooding with its engineering of the project, the people suing might have a case. But…. Does that alone win the case under the Fifth Amendment taking clause? I am not so sure. In US v Causby the Supreme Court ruled that the US government took a man’s property by flying airplanes over it. It was a public airport lawfully leased by the US in WWII and used to fly heavy bombers from it. Causby had an egg farm and the extremely loud noise of some airplanes under full power and sometimes at night with a landing lights being so close, it bothered and scared the family and damaged his egg farm production. Some chickens died and some quit laying eggs due to the extreme disturbances and lights at night. The Supreme Court ruled in Causby’s favor saying that the US had taken away the enjoyment and use of his land even though they didn’t physically seize it. The use of the land was hampered and that was enough for the taking clause under the Fifth Amendment. So in the IH-10 case, did Texas take away the use or enjoyment of the property?  A point of Causby was that the military bombers at a public airport was certainly for “public use”. The planes were public/taxpayers’ and the airport and lease were taxpayers’ property so the “public” definitely used it   My question in this lawsuit against Texas, even in they can prove the damage, was the damage (like in Causby) for “public use”? If not would it then not be a Fifth Amendment case but rather a state law case?  If Texas law denies such a lawsuit under state sovereignty and the families can’t prove a Fifth Amendment case of “public use”, could they prove the damages but still lose the case under state law? I haven’t read that anywhere and just thinking out loud. I could be way off base. But I think it could be interesting…..
    • Both sides...that is, everyone tries to get their people elected. Trump has not weaponized the government to bankrupt and imprison his political opponents. Night and day difference for me.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...