Jump to content

Haynes no longer HFC at Hardin


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, uknowit2 said:

My point is wearing a mask in the July / Aug heat and humidity will be difficult. I know if it were me the mask would be soaking wet after 5 minutes and impossible to breath through.

I saw something a couple months back. I think it was Mizuno that developed a mask for outdoor sports. The article said it's state of the art technology and material.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

On 7/7/2020 at 9:54 AM, mrtomcat said:

Why the confidence all of a sudden in Hardin to go 8-3 ?  New coach?  New kids with new coach?  Move-ins ?   My feelings are, if the almighty Haynes could not win 5 games in Hardin last year, how are they going to turn that program around that fast with the same kids.  No happening in my opinion.  

On 7/8/2020 at 7:46 PM, Chuckwagon said:

All of the above. This group is special been that way since Pee Wee ball. 

There better some of the Resceno's (sp?) or Scott's kids coming through the pipeline for any of this to be even remotely possible.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Football Freak said:

 

There better some of the Resceno's (sp?) or Scott's kids coming through the pipeline for any of this to be even remotely possible.

 

We don’t have them but got an army of tough country boys. The only thing that will slow us down a bit is the team having to learn a new offense and defense in the middle of a pandemic. Y’all wait and see the results! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
10 hours ago, LC_throwback said:

Rumor has it Haynes was paid over 70k to be relieved of his duty. Doesn’t sound like a guilty man to me.

How much!?!?! I knew they were doing a deal but didn’t realize that much of our tax payer money was going to a pay off! 
 
So now we are paying an AD, Head Football Coach, and Larry during the middle of a pandemic?!

boy you sure can’t make this stuff up. Hardin America! Guess Larry will be on a golf course while us poor stiffs are digging ditches. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Mr. Buddy Garrity said:

If that rumor is true would this be the 2nd time they have had to pay off Haynes??

Yes! This is the second time. I’m sure our awesome auxiliary staff or maintenance men would of liked to see some of that money. 
 

instead lets pay 3 people to do the same job and give one the year off. Its like a divorce cheaper to keep her. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chuckwagon said:

Yes! This is the second time. I’m sure our awesome auxiliary staff or maintenance men would of liked to see some of that money. 
 

instead lets pay 3 people to do the same job and give one the year off. Its like a divorce cheaper to keep her. 

 

9 hours ago, Mr. Buddy Garrity said:

If that rumor is true would this be the 2nd time they have had to pay off Haynes??

You got to love Hardin America!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,932
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Newest Member
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...