Jump to content

Haynes no longer HFC at Hardin


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, uknowit2 said:

My point is wearing a mask in the July / Aug heat and humidity will be difficult. I know if it were me the mask would be soaking wet after 5 minutes and impossible to breath through.

I saw something a couple months back. I think it was Mizuno that developed a mask for outdoor sports. The article said it's state of the art technology and material.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

On 7/7/2020 at 9:54 AM, mrtomcat said:

Why the confidence all of a sudden in Hardin to go 8-3 ?  New coach?  New kids with new coach?  Move-ins ?   My feelings are, if the almighty Haynes could not win 5 games in Hardin last year, how are they going to turn that program around that fast with the same kids.  No happening in my opinion.  

On 7/8/2020 at 7:46 PM, Chuckwagon said:

All of the above. This group is special been that way since Pee Wee ball. 

There better some of the Resceno's (sp?) or Scott's kids coming through the pipeline for any of this to be even remotely possible.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Football Freak said:

 

There better some of the Resceno's (sp?) or Scott's kids coming through the pipeline for any of this to be even remotely possible.

 

We don’t have them but got an army of tough country boys. The only thing that will slow us down a bit is the team having to learn a new offense and defense in the middle of a pandemic. Y’all wait and see the results! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
10 hours ago, LC_throwback said:

Rumor has it Haynes was paid over 70k to be relieved of his duty. Doesn’t sound like a guilty man to me.

How much!?!?! I knew they were doing a deal but didn’t realize that much of our tax payer money was going to a pay off! 
 
So now we are paying an AD, Head Football Coach, and Larry during the middle of a pandemic?!

boy you sure can’t make this stuff up. Hardin America! Guess Larry will be on a golf course while us poor stiffs are digging ditches. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Mr. Buddy Garrity said:

If that rumor is true would this be the 2nd time they have had to pay off Haynes??

Yes! This is the second time. I’m sure our awesome auxiliary staff or maintenance men would of liked to see some of that money. 
 

instead lets pay 3 people to do the same job and give one the year off. Its like a divorce cheaper to keep her. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chuckwagon said:

Yes! This is the second time. I’m sure our awesome auxiliary staff or maintenance men would of liked to see some of that money. 
 

instead lets pay 3 people to do the same job and give one the year off. Its like a divorce cheaper to keep her. 

 

9 hours ago, Mr. Buddy Garrity said:

If that rumor is true would this be the 2nd time they have had to pay off Haynes??

You got to love Hardin America!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,924
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Newest Member
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Joined



  • Posts

    • That there’s not a single thread on the fact that the Republican nominee is on trial for paying off a porn star with whom he had an affair while the future First Lady was carrying said nominee’s child.    I remember back when the dirty, no-good Dems sacked Gary Hart over something similar. Same thing with John Edwards and later Anthony Weiner.    But y’all keep pretending God is on your side, lol. 
    • I hear what you’re saying, BUT… that hammers the hell out of poor people and the ones with multiple properties don’t eat any more than the poor ones. In fact, you’d basically just be taxing a lot of peoples’ EBT payments. The government  can’t get ahead by taxing what they’re already borrowing to give to people.    I think well off people should pay more… but the scale as it exists is broken.    For the sake of argument, my mom’s house in Groves is valued at $125k. 2/1/1 on a slab.  Her tax bill is $850/year. Without exemptions, her bill would be 3200. It’s right on JCAD’s website. The problem is this…. If someone tries to rent out an identical house, they’d expect to get, what… $1200/month? If you take into account that homeowners/windstorm/flood is a minimum of another $2k per year, you’d need $5k a year just to cover the taxes and insurance. That’s four months (1/3 of the year) just to cover those costs, not counting a potential mortgage payment. But then everybody cries about how expensive rents are… you can’t tax the hell out of non-homestead property to make up for gifts given to homeowners in the form of big tax cuts. It just doesn’t work.    Ten acres in Lumberton? I’ve got a buddy with 10 acres in Lumberton on HWY 69. Prime property… it’s his retirement plan. Sale it one day and cash in. The CAD decided that it no longer qualifies for a special use valuation (timber) and stripped his “exemption.” His 2023 tax bill jumped from $25 to $22,000…. It’s insane.  
    • I’m curious what happened… they aren’t even in full pads yet. 
    • They’re going to have win almost all remaining games and get finals of tournament to think about an at-large. When LU was in the WAC, Grand Canyon got an at-large after New Mexico St came out of nowhere to win conference tournament. Grand Canyon had a dang good resume that year. It can happen, but resume wise isn’t in their favor.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...