Jump to content

Ahmaud Arbery Shooting


CardinalBacker

Recommended Posts

Once again, the narrative has turned to the epidemic of unarmed young black men being gunned down by racists.  I've gotta cry foul on this one. 

Let me start by saying that it is unfortunate that this young man lost his life so needlessly.  It is a tragedy.  I can't imagine what his family must be feeling.

However, the narrative of "he was just out for a jog when he was hunted down and killed by racists" is hollow, if not outright false.  

There is an epidemic in our country, but it's not one of white on black violence, but rather an epidemic of violent behavior by young black men.  The statistics speak for themselves, but you don't have to go all scientific.  Just scroll through Youtube... there are countless videos of young black men attacking people in fast foot restaurants, schools, parking lots at apartment complexes, and any other public place you can think of.  The black community refuses to acknowledge this fact.  This past Friday the community in Beaumont poured into the streets to protest the Arbery killing... yet I don't remember any such protest or show of support for any of the 2 dozen or so young men that were killed right here in our community last year.  That's so hypocritical that no one participating in Friday's protest can be taken seriously.  The Bible teaches us not to remove the mote from our brother's eye before removing the beam from our own... yet here we are again. 

Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown, and now Ahmaud Arbery.... and who knows how many others. The media tells us that these young men were just out buying skittles, or out for a jog when they were senselessly killed.  In reality, you have three documented cases where young black men got angry and attacked people who (unfortunately for the attackers) were armed.  That's the real story.  George Zimmerman was getting his skull bounced off of the sidewalk when he killed Trayvon Martin.  The photos are there.  Michael Brown was trying to walk down a uniformed police officer whose weapon was drawn after committing a strongarm robbery of a convenience store.  Young Mr. Arbery tried to fight a guy who was holding a shotgun.  I don't think he was scared.  I don't think he was brave or valiant.  I think he was just pissed.  Just like every other person of color that we see attacking a kid behind the counter at McDonald's.  People who have heard a lifetime of "leaders" trying to convince that segment of the population that all of the discomforts of their lives are the fault of others.  I'd be mad, too, if all I ever heard was that all of the struggles of life were the fault of someone else.  

You can talk all you want about "well, that neighborhood watch guy shouldn't have had a gun" or "that cop COULD have used a tazer" or "those rednecks had no right to stop that kid whether he'd just broken into a house or not."  That can be debated from both sides all day... but it's a lot harder to argue that none of those three young men could easily be alive today if they had kept their hands to themselves.  There are some bad people out there.  There are even a few bad people out there who would kill another for the color of their skin.  But there's not a murderous klansman behind every bush.  

Here's the thing that nobody is actually saying.  The eventual shooter had a constitutional right to be standing in the street holding a shotgun.  He also had a right to ask the deceased to stop.  The deceased had no obligation to stop.  If the deceased had been illegally detained, then the man holding the gun would have legal problems of his own.  Instead, the young man attempted to disarm the eventual shooter.  Don't get me wrong.... things were tense out there.  The possibility of someone getting hurt or killed was there as those young men initially approached one another.  But once they began to struggle over the gun, it's obvious that someone was going to get shot.  And I wonder how much of that kid's reaction was based on a lifetime of lies about being in danger of being killed by whitey?

Three takes.... 

1. That young man was out for a jog and he was hunted down and murdered for being black.  

2. That was a messy situation that should not have happened, but now it's up to us to figure out who was responsible and if (and in my opinion, how severely) someone needs to be punished.

3.  I literally saw that young man chase down that truck and attack the driver... luckily the driver was armed.

Only one of those three is rational.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I read and saw about the incident and read GA law on citizen arrest and self defense, in another forum a week ago I called it a murder. 

I don’t think he was out jogging but it didn’t matter. The only question should be, was deadly force legal at the time it was used? Prior criminal record, committed a crime that day or anything else didn’t seem to be the issue. Was pulling a shotgun on an apparently unarmed person lawful. 

 In this case you had two men trying to stop our arrest a man with no visible weapons. Even if he turns to fight (which stand your ground in GA probably gives him rights also), GA law (similar to Texas law) says that to use deadly force, the person had to reasonably  believe that he was about to suffer death or “great bodily harm”. Texas law is almost identical but says “serious bodily injury”. 

 So let’s play devil’s advocate and assume that Arbery had committed a felony. Let’s assume that the men witnessed it as required by law. Let’s assume that they were not trying to just detain him for questioning (I believe was their original statement)  which would be unlawful. Let’s assume that Arbery charges say the man unprovoked.  
 

Did two pretty good size men reasonably fear death or great bodily harm fool Arbery. I am not taking about a bloody nose or a black eye. Those aren’t grounds for deadly force in my opinion. If that were true then every high school fight could end up in a lawful killing.  
 

If everything went against Arbery as far as his actions, does it justify gunning him down? 
 

 I think no. 
 

Now of course there are facts that we do not know. Did Arbery have a knife in his hand or some other weapon? Did he yell, you piece of crap you’re not going to arrest me and lunge at the guys throat?

 There are lots of what ifs but even if Arbery was trying to get away from a felony or he might have punched a guy trying to arrest him, does that alone gives a legal option of deadly force? I don’t think so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, tvc184 said:

From what I read and saw about the incident and read GA law on citizen arrest and self defense, in another forum a week ago I called it a murder. 

I don’t think he was out jogging but it didn’t matter. The only question should be, was deadly force legal at the time it was used? Prior criminal record, committed a crime that day or anything else didn’t seem to be the issue. Was pulling a shotgun on an apparently unarmed person lawful. 

 In this case you had two men trying to stop our arrest a man with no visible weapons. Even if he turns to fight (which stand your ground in GA probably gives him rights also), GA law (similar to Texas law) says that to use deadly force, the person had to reasonably  believe that he was about to suffer death or “great bodily harm”. Texas law is almost identical but says “serious bodily injury”. 

 So let’s play devil’s advocate and assume that Arbery had committed a felony. Let’s assume that the men witnessed it as required by law. Let’s assume that they were not trying to just detain him for questioning (I believe was their original statement)  which would be unlawful. Let’s assume that Arbery charges say the man unprovoked.  
 

Did two pretty good size men reasonably fear death or great bodily harm fool Arbery. I am not taking about a bloody nose or a black eye. Those aren’t grounds for deadly force in my opinion. If that were true then every high school fight could end up in a lawful killing.  
 

If everything went against Arbery as far as his actions, does it justify gunning him down? 
 

 I think no. 
 

Now of course there are facts that we do not know. Did Arbery have a knife in his hand or some other weapon? Did he yell, you piece of crap you’re not going to arrest me and lunge at the guys throat?

 There are lots of what ifs but even if Arbery was trying to get away from a felony or he might have punched a guy trying to arrest him, does that alone gives a legal option of deadly force? I don’t think so.

I believe the two men handled the situation poorly

but put yourself in the shooters place ...jogger is punching kicking wrestling with you. You have the gun....What are you thinking....

 

I can tell you what I’m thinking....this man is trying to get my gun from me and possibly do me great bodily harm

jogger ran around truck then towards the man with gun instead of running away.

jmo.

Again poor decisions by all involved

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with 5GallinBucket, bad decisions by all.  What aggravates me is responses like the one from Lebron James, “We’re literally hunted”.  Not only is that 🐂💩, it extremely divisive, and creates fear & mistrust among the races.  An article on race on race crime for 2015 shows that 500 whites were killed by blacks, and 229 blacks killed by whites.   Those facts show how absurd Lebrons Tweet was.   Both numbers are atrocious.  Good grief, can’t we ever get along?   Not if folks like Lebron keep stirring the Hate pot.

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, tvc184 said:

From what I read and saw about the incident and read GA law on citizen arrest and self defense, in another forum a week ago I called it a murder. 

I don’t think he was out jogging but it didn’t matter. The only question should be, was deadly force legal at the time it was used? Prior criminal record, committed a crime that day or anything else didn’t seem to be the issue. Was pulling a shotgun on an apparently unarmed person lawful. 

 In this case you had two men trying to stop our arrest a man with no visible weapons. Even if he turns to fight (which stand your ground in GA probably gives him rights also), GA law (similar to Texas law) says that to use deadly force, the person had to reasonably  believe that he was about to suffer death or “great bodily harm”. Texas law is almost identical but says “serious bodily injury”. 

 So let’s play devil’s advocate and assume that Arbery had committed a felony. Let’s assume that the men witnessed it as required by law. Let’s assume that they were not trying to just detain him for questioning (I believe was their original statement)  which would be unlawful. Let’s assume that Arbery charges say the man unprovoked.  
 

Did two pretty good size men reasonably fear death or great bodily harm fool Arbery. I am not taking about a bloody nose or a black eye. Those aren’t grounds for deadly force in my opinion. If that were true then every high school fight could end up in a lawful killing.  
 

If everything went against Arbery as far as his actions, does it justify gunning him down? 
 

 I think no. 
 

Now of course there are facts that we do not know. Did Arbery have a knife in his hand or some other weapon? Did he yell, you piece of crap you’re not going to arrest me and lunge at the guys throat?

 There are lots of what ifs but even if Arbery was trying to get away from a felony or he might have punched a guy trying to arrest him, does that alone gives a legal option of deadly force? I don’t think so.

I’m not talking bad about you here... but I think you’ve illustrated a way of thinking that is prevalent regarding these incidents. 
 

There’s a segment of our population that believes that violence is an acceptable response to many, many situations, and that the person who is being attacked should simply take their beating. People are regularly beaten to death. People will often die because of injuries sustained from being knocked out and striking their head on the ground. An unarmed assault has a reasonable expectation of a deadly outcome. 
 

No one has to submit to a beating. There is a very real possibility that the person you intend to harm may kill you for attempting to injure them. Those are facts. 
 

To step back and say “oh, he was unarmed” doesn’t mean anything. I’m under no obligation to engage in unarmed combat with anybody. The simple fact that you are trying to hurt me gives me the right to protect myself by any means necessary.  Period.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Hagar said:

I agree with 5GallinBucket, bad decisions by all.  What aggravates me is responses like the one from Lebron James, “We’re literally hunted”.  Not only is that 🐂💩, it extremely divisive, and creates fear & mistrust among the races.  An article on race on race crime for 2015 shows that 500 whites were killed by blacks, and 229 blacks killed by whites.   Those facts show how absurd Lebrons Tweet was.   Both numbers are atrocious.  Good grief, can’t we ever get along?   Not if folks like Lebron keep stirring the Hate pot.

This is the hidden content, please

This^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have (had) a good friend and former coworker from PA by way of Alabama. Solid dude (also happened to be black) from a solid family. PA firefighter and eventually went to work for one of the plants. Single Dad of a couple of great sons . I can’t express how solid of a guy he is. 

But he spends so much time worried that his boys will gunned down by bad cops. I’m just looking at him thinking..: your boys are so much more likely to get killed by bangers right there in PA than by a bad cop.  
 

We’re not friends on fb anymore and I’m sure it’s because of political views. I still like him, though. I just think he worries about the wrong stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, stevenash said:

Correct me if I am wrong but havent we sort have been conditioned that when a crime is perpetrated by a black person, it is somehow wrong to mention skin color.  That doesnt seem to be the case in the above.  What am I missing?

How did he perpetuate the crime?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CardinalBacker said:

I’m not talking bad about you here... but I think you’ve illustrated a way of thinking that is prevalent regarding these incidents. 
 

There’s a segment of our population that believes that violence is an acceptable response to many, many situations, and that the person who is being attacked should simply take their beating. People are regularly beaten to death. People will often die because of injuries sustained from being knocked out and striking their head on the ground. An unarmed assault has a reasonable expectation of a deadly outcome. 
 

No one has to submit to a beating. There is a very real possibility that the person you intend to harm may kill you for attempting to injure them. Those are facts. 
 

To step back and say “oh, he was unarmed” doesn’t mean anything. I’m under no obligation to engage in unarmed combat with anybody. The simple fact that you are trying to hurt me gives me the right to protect myself by any means necessary.  Period.  

Your ignorance is astonishing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It sells. Nobody cares when the crimes are homogenous. I can’t name a single kid that was killed in Jeffco last year. 
 

But the sides are already chosen up when the crime is across racial lines. It gets us up in arms, trolling webpages and monitoring the news for updates. We emotionally react when there’s a racial aspect, so they (the media) runs with it. It also benefits us politically... whether you’re on the left decrying racist cops or on the right blaming those criminal illegal aliens... the powers that be push their agendas on the backs of crime victims. 
 

Before anybody says it, it’s not because white people go unpunished. Cody Crabtree was gunned down in the parking lot of an apartment complex in North Beaumont in broad daylight. He was a white kid who was in all likelihood down there looking to score... but nobody saw anything and if you ask me the cops kinda felt like he was asking for it. 
 

I don’t know how we fix it. There’s no amount of “sensitivity training” that would have saved young Mr Arbery’s life. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Big girl said:

Did you all watch the video? They persued him. Young white males are violent. They commit a majority of the school shootings.

You’re right on that point, my friend. White makes have committed a majority of the school shootings (and mass shootings in general).  
 

But I’m not talking about school shootings, because they make up such a tiny percentage of violent deaths in the US. Although that number is larger than the number of “unarmed black men killed by racists.” 
 

If you’d like to discuss the largest group of murders (black on black) or the second largest group of murders (black on white), join in the conversation. 
 

I’d also like to point out that contrary to what people keep saying, I don’t see the pursuit on that video... however the Atlanta Constitution is today reporting an earlier confrontation between the “rednecks” and Mr Arbery on 2/11 (less than two weeks prior)at the same construction site.  I guess Mr Arbery was just out jogging that night, too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Big girl said:

How did he perpetuate the crime?

You clearly, in your  desire to make things seem as they aren't, misunderstood my post.  I sad NOTHING. NADA, ZILCH about Mr. Arbery perpetrating anything.  I asked a very generalized question hoping to gain a better understanding that, when a black person commits a crime, it is somehow wrong to mention the skin color when reported by the media.   However, when an incident such as the above occurs, the main topic is reduced simply to a black person being wronged by a white person and is stated over,  and over, and over.  If you still dont understand my question, let me know and I will try to put it alternative terms.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

I’m not talking bad about you here... but I think you’ve illustrated a way of thinking that is prevalent regarding these incidents. 
 

There’s a segment of our population that believes that violence is an acceptable response to many, many situations, and that the person who is being attacked should simply take their beating. People are regularly beaten to death. People will often die because of injuries sustained from being knocked out and striking their head on the ground. An unarmed assault has a reasonable expectation of a deadly outcome. 
 

No one has to submit to a beating. There is a very real possibility that the person you intend to harm may kill you for attempting to injure them. Those are facts. 
 

To step back and say “oh, he was unarmed” doesn’t mean anything. I’m under no obligation to engage in unarmed combat with anybody. The simple fact that you are trying to hurt me gives me the right to protect myself by any means necessary.  Period.  

But why did they confront him in the first place? I’m not playing ignorant, I sincerely can’t figure out how the confrontation started. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You’d have to ask them. However, it is every one of our constitutional right to stand in the street with a shotgun. It is also our right to confront anybody we want to for whatever we want to. That’s another fact. However, I stand to face criminal and civil actions if I attempt to do something that violates the rights of another. I could also be responsible for whatever mayhem erupts from my actions if I was mistaken. 
 

However a few points keep getting overlooked. This was not the first or second meeting between these “gentlemen” and Mr Arbery. The older one was personally responsible for having Mr Arbery’s prior probation revoked several years ago. It’s come to light today that prior to this confrontation on 2/23, there was also a confrontation between the same parties at the same construction site on the night of 2/11.  If you count the homeowner (English), the neighbor he called to investigate (Perez), the cameraman, the cop(s) that investigated the 2/11 intrusion, plus the shooter and his dad, no less than six people who were aware of this young man’s repeated entrances to a dwelling (under construction) to which he had no right to enter. That’s enough to warrant a confrontation. Does it justify a citizen’s arrest? Not in my opinion.  But it wasn’t much of an “arrest” because Mr Arbery began fighting with the son pretty much immediately. And you don’t have to ask who initiated contact because I not going to pretend that the son was holding his shotgun while attacking Mr Arbery with the other. 
I wish Mr Arbery was still alive. I wish those gentlemen had safely followed at a distance instead of trying to confront him. I wish that Mr Arbery hadn’t scuffled with an armed man. I wish a lot of things. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CardinalBacker said:

You’re right on that point, my friend. White makes have committed a majority of the school shootings (and mass shootings in general).  
 

But I’m not talking about school shootings, because they make up such a tiny percentage of violent deaths in the US. Although that number is larger than the number of “unarmed black men killed by racists.” 
 

If you’d like to discuss the largest group of murders (black on black) or the second largest group of murders (black on white), join in the conversation. 
 

I’d also like to point out that contrary to what people keep saying, I don’t see the pursuit on that video... however the Atlanta Constitution is today reporting an earlier confrontation between the “rednecks” and Mr Arbery on 2/11 (less than two weeks prior)at the same construction site.  I guess Mr Arbery was just out jogging that night, too. 

Black on black -93%

White on white crime- 89%

People kill most amongst their racial group.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

You’d have to ask them. However, it is every one of our constitutional right to stand in the street with a shotgun. It is also our right to confront anybody we want to for whatever we want to. That’s another fact. However, I stand to face criminal and civil actions if I attempt to do something that violates the rights of another. I could also be responsible for whatever mayhem erupts from my actions if I was mistaken. 
 

However a few points keep getting overlooked. This was not the first or second meeting between these “gentlemen” and Mr Arbery. The older one was personally responsible for having Mr Arbery’s prior probation revoked several years ago. It’s come to light today that prior to this confrontation on 2/23, there was also a confrontation between the same parties at the same construction site on the night of 2/11.  If you count the homeowner (English), the neighbor he called to investigate (Perez), the cameraman, the cop(s) that investigated the 2/11 intrusion, plus the shooter and his dad, no less than six people who were aware of this young man’s repeated entrances to a dwelling (under construction) to which he had no right to enter. That’s enough to warrant a confrontation. Does it justify a citizen’s arrest? Not in my opinion.  But it wasn’t much of an “arrest” because Mr Arbery began fighting with the son pretty much immediately. And you don’t have to ask who initiated contact because I not going to pretend that the son was holding his shotgun while attacking Mr Arbery with the other. 
I wish Mr Arbery was still alive. I wish those gentlemen had safely followed at a distance instead of trying to confront him. I wish that Mr Arbery hadn’t scuffled with an armed man. I wish a lot of things. 
 

He was within his right to jog, and to fight for his life. Did you watch the video?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,276
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    sacsc
    Newest Member
    sacsc
    Joined

  • Posts

    • Speak to someone at Virgin , dial their customer service number 𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜(𝐋𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐡𝐮𝐦𝐚𝐧) 𝐨𝐫 𝟏 𝟖𝟎𝟎-VIRGIN 𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜(𝓡𝓔𝓪𝓵 𝓟𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓸𝓷𝓼) and listen to the automated menu. Typically, pressing '0' multiple times or saying "agent" will connect you to a representative. Be prepared for potential wait times, especially during busy periods. Once connected, clearly explain your issue or question to the representative, who will assist you accordingly. Being polite and patient can help expedite the process. Dial𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜 real customer Support Number at 𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜(𝐋𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐡𝐮𝐦𝐚𝐧) 𝐨𝐫 𝟏 𝟖𝟎𝟎-VIRGIN 𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜(𝓡𝓔𝓪𝓵 𝓟𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓸𝓷𝓼) for connecting with a Live agent on𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜. we'll explore the various ways you can connect with a live representative at𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜 and ensure your concerns are addressed promptly. To talk to a person at𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜, you have options. You can call their customer service hotline "" 𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜(𝐋𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐡𝐮𝐦𝐚𝐧) 𝐨𝐫 𝟏 𝟖𝟎𝟎-VIRGIN 𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜(𝓡𝓔𝓪𝓵 𝓟𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓸𝓷𝓼))"", engage in live chat on their website, or use email support. To talk to a person at𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜, you have several options. You can call𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜 Customer Service hotline 𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜(𝐋𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐡𝐮𝐦𝐚𝐧) 𝐨𝐫 𝟏 𝟖𝟎𝟎-VIRGIN 𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜(𝓡𝓔𝓪𝓵 𝓟𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓸𝓷𝓼)”, engage in live chat on their website, or use email support. How Do I Talk to a Live Person at𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜? Dial:𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜 Customer Service Number 𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜(𝐋𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐡𝐮𝐦𝐚𝐧) 𝐨𝐫 𝟏 𝟖𝟎𝟎-VIRGIN 𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜(𝓡𝓔𝓪𝓵 𝓟𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓸𝓷𝓼). To talk to a person at𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜, you have options. You can call𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜 Customer Service Number hotline 𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜(𝐋��𝐯𝐞 𝐡𝐮𝐦𝐚𝐧) 𝐨𝐫 𝟏 𝟖𝟎𝟎-VIRGIN 𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜(𝓡𝓔𝓪𝓵 𝓟𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓸𝓷𝓼)”, engage in live chat on their website, or use email support. Phone: Call 𝗟𝘂𝗳𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻𝘀 ‘s customer support line at 𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜(𝐋𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐡𝐮𝐦𝐚𝐧) 𝐨𝐫 𝟏 𝟖𝟎𝟎-VIRGIN(𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜)(𝓡𝓔𝓪𝓵 𝓟𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓸𝓷𝓼). Online Chat: Use the chat feature on𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜 website. Social Media: Reach out through 𝗟𝘂𝗳𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻𝘀 ‘s social media profiles. The most direct way to speak with a Lufthansa representative is by calling their customer service line 24 hours a day and seven days a week by calling at 𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜(𝐋𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐡𝐮𝐦𝐚𝐧) 𝐨𝐫 𝟏 𝟖𝟎𝟎-VIRGIN(𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜)(𝓡𝓔𝓪𝓵 𝓟𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓸𝓷𝓼). Lufthansa's customer service number can be found on their official website. Lufthansa Customer Service Contact: Lufthansa provides a dedicated customer service helpline for customers seeking assistance with booking,𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜 information, baggage, or any other travel-related issues. Lufthansa customer service helpline is available 24/7 at 𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜(𝐋𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐡𝐮𝐦𝐚𝐧) 𝐨𝐫 𝟏 𝟖𝟎𝟎-VIRGIN 𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜(𝓡𝓔𝓪𝓵 𝓟𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓸𝓷𝓼). You can also contact Lufthansa customer service through the helpline Number 𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜(𝐋𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐡𝐮𝐦𝐚𝐧) 𝐨𝐫 𝟏 𝟖𝟎𝟎-VIRGIN 𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜(𝓡𝓔𝓪𝓵 𝓟𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓸𝓷𝓼). How do I speak to a real Human at𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜? To connect with𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜, you have several options: But the most efficient way is to call their𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜 Live person at 𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜(REal Persons). Phone: Call𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜's customer support line at 𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜(𝐋𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐡𝐮𝐦𝐚𝐧) 𝐨𝐫 𝟏 𝟖𝟎𝟎-VIRGIN(𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜)(𝓡𝓔𝓪𝓵 𝓟𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓸𝓷𝓼). Online Chat: Use the chat feature on𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜's website. Social Media: Reach out through𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜's social media profiles. Email: Send an email to𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜's customer service. Mobile App: Use the𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜 mobile application for assistance. Airport Counter: Speak directly to𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜 staff at the airport. How do I talk to a live person at Lufthansa? To connect with Lufthansa customer support, you have several options: But the most efficient way is to call their Lufthansa Live person at Lufthansa 𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜(𝐋𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐡𝐮𝐦𝐚𝐧) 𝐨𝐫 𝟏 𝟖𝟎𝟎-VIRGIN 𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜(𝓡𝓔𝓪𝓵 𝓟𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓸𝓷𝓼)(Live human). Phone: Call Lufthansa's customer support line at Lufthansa(𝕆𝕋𝔸) 𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜(𝐋𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐡𝐮𝐦𝐚𝐧) 𝐨𝐫 𝟏 𝟖𝟎𝟎-VIRGIN 𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜(𝓡𝓔𝓪𝓵 𝓟𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓸𝓷𝓼) (Live Persons). Whether you are seeking assistance with booking confirmation,𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜 status, etc. Lufthansa’s dedicated customer care team is always ready to assist you. Passengers can Call Lufthansa by dialling the Phone Number at 𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜(𝐋𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐡𝐮𝐦𝐚𝐧) 𝐨𝐫 𝟏 𝟖𝟎𝟎-VIRGIN 𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜(𝓡𝓔𝓪𝓵 𝓟𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓸𝓷𝓼) and get a quick answer on the call. You can get 24-hour immediate assistance on your query. This is the best alternative to get through to a Lufthansa real person. Customers need to dial the Lufthansa reservations phone number 𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜(𝐋𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐡𝐮𝐦𝐚𝐧) 𝐨𝐫 𝟏 𝟖𝟎𝟎-VIRGIN 𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜(𝓡𝓔𝓪𝓵 𝓟𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓸𝓷𝓼) or can choose any other number according to their country, which can be obtained from the official website. To really get through to𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜, explore multiple avenues such as phone support "𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜(𝐋𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐡𝐮𝐦𝐚𝐧) 𝐨𝐫 𝟏 𝟖𝟎𝟎-VIRGIN 𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜(𝓡𝓔𝓪𝓵 𝓟𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓸𝓷𝓼)", online chat on their official website, and social media platforms like Twitter or Facebook. Utilize self-help resources on the website, including the "Manage My Booking" feature for reservation modifications. Frequent flyer program members may find dedicated support channels. For urgent matters, consider visiting the airport customer service desk. Email support is also an option, ensuring you provide detailed information for effective assistance. The most direct way to speak with a Lufthansa representative is by calling their customer service line 24 hours a day and seven days a week by calling at "(0TA) 𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜(𝐋𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐡𝐮𝐦𝐚𝐧) 𝐨𝐫 𝟏 𝟖𝟎𝟎-VIRGIN (𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜)(𝓡𝓔𝓪𝓵 𝓟𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓸𝓷𝓼) Lufthansa's customer service number can be found on their official website. To speak to a live person at𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜, you can call their customer service phone number " 𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜(𝐋𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐡𝐮𝐦𝐚𝐧) 𝐨𝐫 𝟏 𝟖𝟎𝟎-VIRGIN 𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜(𝓡𝓔𝓪𝓵 𝓟𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓸𝓷𝓼), which is typically available on their official website. The most immediate and direct way to connect with𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜 is through their dedicated customer service hotline. Dial the𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜 phone number: 𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜(𝐋𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐡𝐮𝐦𝐚𝐧) 𝐨𝐫 𝟏 𝟖𝟎𝟎-VIRGIN 𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜(𝓡𝓔𝓪𝓵 𝓟𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓸𝓷𝓼) to speak with a live representative who can assist with a range of inquiries, including booking details,𝟙-𝟠𝟛𝟛-𝟝𝟞𝟛-𝟘𝟚𝟙𝟜 information, or specific concerns. Virgin phone number UK Virgin contact number 24 hours Virgin reservations phone number Virgin contact number London Virgin contact email Virgin Customer service hours #Virgin phone number #Virgin customer service #Virgin contact number #Virgin customer service number #talktoarealpersonatVirgin #getthroughtoVirgin #speaktoalivpersonatVirgin      
    • You can reach QuickBooks Support by calling 1-844)-539-0188. The toll-free line connects you with QuickBooks customer service specialists that are equipped to help you with any QuickBooks related queries or problems. The support team can provide you with the information and assistance that you need, whether it's for technical issues, questions regarding your account or guidance in using QuickBooks features. To speak with a real person in QuickBooks Error support number, dial 1-844-INTUIT(1-844)-539-0188)(No Wait). Select the live helpline option and follow the automated prompts. Wait patiently for help. Tell us your question clearly to get personalized QuickBooks support. To speak with a live person at the QuickBooks Error support number, simply dial 1-833-INTUIT(1-844)-539-0188)(No Wait). After connecting, you can either navigate the menus or follow instructions in order to speak with a representative at QB Error customer care number. Wait times can vary. Explain your QuickBooks query in detail when you connect to receive personalized help. To speak to a live person in QuickBooks Error support number, dial 1-844-INTUIT(1-844)-539-0188) or 1-833-603-0120(No Wait). Select the options to get live help by following the prompts. Wait times can vary. Explain your question clearly to the customer service representative once you are connected. They will offer personalized assistance. Be sure to prepare all the account information for an easier experience. Intuit QuickBooks Customer Service is often referred to as 1-844)-539-0188. The QuickBooks customer service phone number is different than the QuickBooks customer service one. QuickBooks is also an Intuit Product and has dedicated support numbers. The general QuickBooks customer service phone number is typically 1-844)-539-0188. It's best to check the QuickBooks official website, or your QuickBooks account for the latest contact information. QuickBooks is usually associated with the number 1-844)-539-0188. This is a free customer service hotline that users can use to get help with Intuit's products. You can reach QuickBooks Support at 1-844)-539-0188. The helpline numbers have knowledgeable staff who can address many accounting issues. Is there a 24 hour service for QuickBooks? To speak with a representative at QuickBooks Error support number, dial 1-844-INTUIT(1-844)-539-0188(No Wait). When you call, go through the automated system to select Error number. To reach a live person in QuickBooks Error contact number, dial 1-844-INTUIT(1-844)-539-0188. After connecting, you can navigate through the menus or remain on the phone for help. Wait times can vary. Be patient. Once connected, be sure to provide all your information and questions clearly so that a QuickBooks representative can assist you effectively. To communicate with QuickBooks support, dial 1-833-INTUIT(1-844)-539-0188) for direct support. Phone assistance can provide quick answers to questions or problems. Access online resources like FAQs, community forums, and tutorials. To speak with a human in QuickBooks Error contact number, dial 1-844-INTUIT(1-844)-539-0188. Follow the automated instructions when you call to reach a representative. To speak with the QuickBooks Error support number, dial 1-844-INTUIT(1-844)-539-0188. Follow the directions to access the support menu after connecting. Choose QuickBooks Desktop support to connect with a representative. To speak to a live person at QuickBooks, dial 1-844)-539-0188. Navigate the menus or wait for a prompt.
    • Quickbooks Online Support Number +1-844-397-7462 makes it simple for businesses to manage their taxes. The creators of QuickBooks, Intuit, offer a specialized customer support line to help consumers with any problems relating to their program. Users can get help with a range of Support-related operations, including setting up and administering payroll, generating reports, computing taxes and deductions, and resolving technical issues by dialing the Quickbooks Support Number +1-844-397-7462. Users of Support can contact the support staff at any time with questions or problems they may be experiencing. You can reach the QuickBooks Payroll helpline by calling the toll-free number given by Intuit or by visiting the QuickBooks website. Depending on their needs, users can also access live chat or email help. QuickBooks customer service QuickBooks error support Quickbooks enterprise support number Quickbooks premier support number QuickBooks customer service number Quickbooks pro support number Despite its many benefits, QuickBooks can sometimes encounter errors that can disrupt business operations. Simple data entry errors to more complicated problems with program setup or network access fall under this category. Users can use the QuickBooks error support service to help them fix these issues. The support staff is made up of qualified experts with experience fixing QuickBooks issues. Users who are having technical difficulties with the software can receive support from them for speedy resolution of any issues and return to managing their accounts. In general, businesses utilizing QuickBooks depend on its customer support to ensure seamless financial operations by offering quick and efficient solutions.  
    • Quickbooks Online help Number +1-844-397-7462 makes it simple for businesses to manage their taxes. The creators of QuickBooks, Intuit, offer a specialized customer support line to help consumers with any problems relating to their program. Users can get help with a range of Support-related operations, including setting up and administering payroll, generating reports, computing taxes and deductions, and resolving technical issues by dialing the Quickbooks Support Number +1-844-397-7462. Users of Support can contact the support staff at any time with questions or problems they may be experiencing. You can reach the QuickBooks Payroll helpline by calling the toll-free number given by Intuit or by visiting the QuickBooks website. Depending on their needs, users can also access live chat or email help. QuickBooks customer service QuickBooks error support Quickbooks enterprise support number Quickbooks premier support number QuickBooks customer service number Quickbooks pro support number Despite its many benefits, QuickBooks can sometimes encounter errors that can disrupt business operations. Simple data entry errors to more complicated problems with program setup or network access fall under this category. Users can use the QuickBooks error support service to help them fix these issues. The support staff is made up of qualified experts with experience fixing QuickBooks issues. Users who are having technical difficulties with the software can receive support from them for speedy resolution of any issues and return to managing their accounts. In general, businesses utilizing QuickBooks depend on its customer support to ensure seamless financial operations by offering quick and efficient solutions.  
    • QuickBooks Online Support +1-844-397-7462 is a well-known bookkeeping program created by Intuit. It is utilized by organizations, everything being equal, to deal with their monetary exchanges, track costs, produce solicitations, and perform other bookkeeping assignments. While QuickBooks is for the most part easy to understand, there might be examples when clients experience specialized issues or need support with the product. To offer Support to its clients, Intuit offers QuickBooks specialized Support administrations. Clients can contact the QuickBooks specialized Support group for assistance with investigating specialized issues, settling programming blunders, and finding solutions to their inquiries connected with QuickBooks's usefulness. The QuickBooks specialized Support number is a committed telephone number given by Intuit, which clients can call to look for Support. By reaching this number, clients can associate with prepared Support delegates who have skills in QuickBooks and can direct them through different issues they might experience while utilizing the product. While calling the QuickBooks specialized Support number, clients are regularly expected to give data about their particular issue or question. The Support delegate will then, at that point, Support them by giving bit-by-bit directions, investigating directions, or remotely getting to their framework to analyze and determine the issue.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...