Jump to content

Montverde Academy Crowned National Champions


Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, TheTruth34 said:

I watched every single Southland team play this year at least once if not twice. I can safely say that Monteverde would beat every team in the conference. Take SFA, the best team in the conference by far. Their big man is about 6’6-6-7, 260 lbs. In pick and rolls he cannot possible guard MVA’s quick bigs. MVA is also coached by a HS coaching legend, Kevin Boyle, who could be at a plethora of Power 5 schools if he wanted to be. He is a good enough coach to immediately see that mismatch and score at will. The matchups just aren’t there even for the most dominant team in the conference. Also worth noting, Cade Cunningham runs that show and he may be 18 years old but had the body AND mind of a 25 year old. 

SFA beat DUKE with more talent then Monteverde has...So to say they would beat everybody is crazy...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Magic Johnson said:

SFA beat DUKE with more talent then Monteverde has...So to say they would beat everybody is crazy...

Kind of my thoughts as well on SFA.  They were a team deserving of a big dance bid, even if they hadn’t won the SLC tournament.   Kevon Harris was easily the best player in the conference this year.  Even so, he’s a far cry from an even 18 yo Cunningham, who will be the favorite to be Big XII player of the year next season (maybe the best Big 12 player since KD).  And no doubt MV has a far superior front court to SFA.  
 

Still, given what they were able to accomplish this season, I couldn’t favor a HS team over the Jacks.  I will say that I’m not sure who Comeaux guards on that team.  Every one of their guards is bigger and more skilled.  Likewise with SFA’s fronts.  They are undersized and less athletic.  Still, I have to give props to any team that beats any Coach K Duke team.  
 

But to say MV wouldn’t beat the majority of the SLC teams just simply is naive.  A few of those kids will be in the NBA in a little over a year.  A couple likely will be starters.  And the argument is whether they are the best HS team of all time.  A likely contender would be the Ben Simmons, D’Angelo Russell team (also Montverde).  Are we going to say that a team with a No 1 overall pick and a No 2 overall pick after one year of college ball wouldn’t beat most mid majors?

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

I agree.

I do too AAW but imagine a team that beats Silsbee’s last state title team by 60-80 points (if not worse).  Because that’s what you’re talking about.  With, as Truth pointed out, a likely top 5 or 10 all time HS coach.  A coach who could leave tomorrow for most open Power 5 conference team head jobs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

I agree.

You are looking at what SFA did this year and not looking at the matchups. No offense to SFA’s big but a slow 6’6 big man can’t stay on the floor with future NBA bigs. Also, you can’t name one player on SFA’s entire roster that can guard a 6’7 point guard that will be in the mix for the #1 pick in the 2021 NBA draft. No discredit to what SFA accomplished this season. They play very hard and are very well coached. But when you put them on the same floor with guys who could play in the NBA right now, their talent can’t stack up. I’m not saying they have no shot, but it would be an upset, just like against Duke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, TxHoops said:

Kind of my thoughts as well on SFA.  They were a team deserving of a big dance bid, even if they hadn’t won the SLC tournament.   Kevon Harris was easily the best player in the conference this year.  Even so, he’s a far cry from an even 18 yo Cunningham, who will be the favorite to be Big XII player of the year next season (maybe the best Big 12 player since KD).  And no doubt MV has a far superior front court to SFA.  
 

Still, given what they were able to accomplish this season, I couldn’t favor a HS team over the Jacks.  I will say that I’m not sure who Comeaux guards on that team.  Every one of their guards is bigger and more skilled.  Likewise with SFA’s fronts.  They are undersized and less athletic.  Still, I have to give props to any team that beats any Coach K Duke team.  
 

But to say MV wouldn’t beat the majority of the SLC teams just simply is naive.  A few of those kids will be in the NBA in a little over a year.  A couple likely will be starters.  And the argument is whether they are the best HS team of all time.  A likely contender would be the Ben Simmons, D’Angelo Russell team (also Montverde).  Are we going to say that a team with a No 1 overall pick and a No 2 overall pick after one year of college ball wouldn’t beat most mid majors?

This is the hidden content, please

Exactly. You have to actually look at the talent on the roster instead of assuming that they have certain limitation just because they are a HS team. I would bet that in a few years when Cade Cunningham is established in the league, the opinions on the conversation will change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can look for it to happen in the near future with more kids whether it be a sibling or a parent...Prep Schools do it all the time...they hire the Dad of a kid who's a possible lottery pick to Coach knowing hes bringing his son there and possibly bring an AAU teammate or two that can help the program win games since most of the private prep schools now have on campus living. I expect Houston to be doing it soon in Katy at the school called the Village...the Headcoach came from one of the perennial powerhouses and the resources he has is unlimited for himself and he has the son of a Hall of Famer there starting Highschool as well as one just Graduating and he himself likes to be in the gym with the kids himself because of the love of the game....The Dream...only know because I've seen it...worked a camp there this past summer....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, TheTruth34 said:

I watched every single Southland team play this year at least once if not twice. I can safely say that Monteverde would beat every team in the conference. Take SFA, the best team in the conference by far. Their big man is about 6’6-6-7, 260 lbs. In pick and rolls he cannot possible guard MVA’s quick bigs. MVA is also coached by a HS coaching legend, Kevin Boyle, who could be at a plethora of Power 5 schools if he wanted to be. He is a good enough coach to immediately see that mismatch and score at will. The matchups just aren’t there even for the most dominant team in the conference. Also worth noting, Cade Cunningham runs that show and he may be 18 years old but had the body AND mind of a 25 year old. 

I am reading all of these exchanges with a great deal of interest.   If I am understanding you all correctly, then the Houston Rockets should be losing every game with the biggest player on the floor being about 6'6"  ( at that level, who the coach is doesnt matter too much because they are all very competent)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, stevenash said:

I am reading all of these exchanges with a great deal of interest.   If I am understanding you all correctly, then the Houston Rockets should be losing every game with the biggest player on the floor being about 6'6"  ( at that level, who the coach is doesnt matter too much because they are all very competent)

What the Rockets do is a little different because they don’t run a big man. They play 5 guards/wings and use the speed and quickness of the small ball lineup to their advantage. SFA doesn’t play this way. Their pure 5 man is 6’6 and not quick. He’s very strong and plays really hard, but he is not quick at all. He’s very good at what he does and he works very well in the Southland because there’s not too much size in the conference as a whole. MVA’s center, Day’Ron Sharpe, is taller, just as strong, and runs the floor like a guard. It is a matchup nightmare for SFA especially with CC who is a smart PG and will find the mismatch every play. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Hooohead.com said:

They were very smart...They gave the one person a job who Cade trust throughout the process...His older Brother who now Coaches there...

Yes, Cade was a lock to OK State months before he committed. I will give credit to their coaching staff because they brought in a few more really nice players as well. Should be a great year for Oklahoma State basketball next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, stevenash said:

I am reading all of these exchanges with a great deal of interest.   If I am understanding you all correctly, then the Houston Rockets should be losing every game with the biggest player on the floor being about 6'6"  ( at that level, who the coach is doesnt matter too much because they are all very competent)

Let me add that not a team in the SLC has guards equivalent at the college level to a James Harden and Russell Westbrook.   What they would be playing vs MV is guards that ARE the equivalent - at that level of course.  Along with bigs that are blue chip program level elites. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/24/2020 at 2:04 PM, TxHoops said:

Let me add that not a team in the SLC has guards equivalent at the college level to a James Harden and Russell Westbrook.   What they would be playing vs MV is guards that ARE the equivalent - at that level of course.  Along with bigs that are blue chip program level elites. 

Is all of mv key players seniors ? I agree that if the game was played we would no doubt  know who the best players are in the game.. but the major mismatch is college upper classmen vs 10th graders... regardless of height and size , maturity and Basketball iq is a big advantage... especially when ya dealing with kids that are in the  15-22 age range .. each year is a huge gap until u reach ur peak 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, bayou city 713 said:

When I was younger I would debate my gpa And uncle on whether on the best 5a high school  Football team could beat the worst swac team , my gpa would be like no because what the college players lack physically  they supplement it with experience/iq and technique 

Huge difference between football and basketball.  Huge.  There’s a reason they have to stay in college longer (Or have to go to college) in that sport than the others.  Comparing apples and asparagus.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/24/2020 at 2:04 PM, TxHoops said:

Let me add that not a team in the SLC has guards equivalent at the college level to a James Harden and Russell Westbrook.   What they would be playing vs MV is guards that ARE the equivalent - at that level of course.  Along with bigs that are blue chip program level elites. 

One of the points being made was that if the post man is several inches taller and also quicker, that "mismatch" would be quickly and often exploited.   I have watched PJ Tucker against several different competent big men, and that "exploitation" rarely comes to pass

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, stevenash said:

One of the points being made was that if the post man is several inches taller and also quicker, that "mismatch" would be quickly and often exploited.   I have watched PJ Tucker against several different competent big men, and that "exploitation" rarely comes to pass

Valid point.  Problem here is, MV roster is just better across the board.  And you are using an elite NBA defender as an example.  Guess what, Barkley played a lot bigger than 6-4 1/2 too.   Haven’t seen SFA’s big man.  Assuming from the poster who has, he’s not PJ or Chuck.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

I bet several of the players on MV's team are "reclassified" players. Some probably are 19-20 years old by now.

Maybe so.  But Cunningham is 18.  And If he was eligible, might be the top pick in this year’s draft.  Would definitely be top 5. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TxHoops said:

Valid point.  Problem here is, MV roster is just better across the board.  And you are using an elite NBA defender as an example.  Guess what, Barkley played a lot bigger than 6-4 1/2 too.   Haven’t seen SFA’s big man.  Assuming from the poster who has, he’s not PJ or Chuck.  

Yes, I am using elite NBA defender but he is going up against elite centers as well

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, stevenash said:

One of the points being made was that if the post man is several inches taller and also quicker, that "mismatch" would be quickly and often exploited.   I have watched PJ Tucker against several different competent big men, and that "exploitation" rarely comes to pass

The point I was trying to make is that the rockets can use small ball effectively because it creates mismatches from the quickness of the lineup. They run a 5 out set and rely on their two star guards to create. Why running PJ tucker works is because he draws the big out of the paint because his corner three ball draws respect and attention. He’s also quick enough to drive by most bigs on close outs. SFA’s big is a liability on offense so he would just be a mismatch with no benefit on the offensive end. Also to your point, the NBA today hardly ever feeds bigs down low. A lot of NBA bigs don’t even have polished post skills. Most are either rim running athletic bigs or stretch bigs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pj tucker uses other things that comes with experience and being a NBA veteran  to make up for his lack of height and other deficiencies   . The best big man in college would struggle vs him, he’ll they would even struggle vs harden down low. You guys are u underrating basketball experience , and basketball experience vs competition. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...