Jump to content

Everyone about to get a $1,000 check?


PhatMack19

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Physical Atmosphere said:

Did you notice the forced migration on the rest of the world (Germany, France, Italy  etc) over the last ten years ? Do you know why ?

This is the hidden content, please

So if the U.N. has the power to force migration on all of the countries of the world regardless of what the citizens of those countries want shows me that they are in control of every country.

You have to see the entire picture to put it all together . 

And only a "few" can see the "big picture"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Physical Atmosphere said:

Did you notice the forced migration on the rest of the world (Germany, France, Italy  etc) over the last ten years ? Do you know why ?

This is the hidden content, please

So if the U.N. has the power to force migration on all of the countries of the world regardless of what the citizens of those countries want shows me that they are in control of every country.

So it just happens to be a coincidence that the "border crisis", Obrador (a known socialist) taking over the Mexican presidency, Justin Trudeau being a socialist Canadian president and both of these signing their sovereignty  away via the U.N. Migrant Compact and the USA entering a trade agreement with both of these neighboring countries all occurred simultaneously ?

You have to see the entire picture to put it all together . 

Why do you call it “forced” migration. Did those countries not agree?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Physical Atmosphere said:

You may have misunderstood the question. The trade agreement and Migrant compact are two different things.

Why would we remain in the newly formed "trade agreement" with Mexico & Canada after they signed the U.N. Migrant Compact ?

No, I understand the question. I realize they are different things. I answered your question with a question. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Physical Atmosphere said:

Well Russia doesn't share a border with us like Russia so there is no comparison. Mexico and Canada do share our border and are geographically the last place we would want anyone that could put our way of life at jeopardy.

JUST ANSWER: Why do they get rewarded with a trade agreement with us after they sign an compact which is against our interest ?

I don’t know the answer. But it doesn’t have to be because it’s a back door to us ultimately agreeing to the UN Migrant Compact. 
Are you sure you don’t want to go along with the Martian thing. It may be more believable.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Physical Atmosphere said:

Smash, I thought we were having a civil conversation. You dodged my question, you should try politics.

Nothing but respect man. PEACE

It is civil. I haven’t been uncivil whatsoever. Not agreeing with you does not mean I’m not being civil. 
And now you’re dodging my question...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Physical Atmosphere said:

You still left my question unanswered. To answer your last one: We should have shut down international travel when this began 8-9 months ago.

Well dont I feel stupid? I thought it started back in December?

But yes I agree, should have shut it down much sooner. Or at least funneled returning american citizens into a single quarantine location. I'm reminded of the scene in the godfather, where Vito corleone was in quarantine at Ellis island. Not allowed entry then tested.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Physical Atmosphere said:

You still left my question unanswered. To answer your last one: We should have shut down international travel when this began 8-9 months ago.

Ain’t it funny how closing international borders can be agreed upon when there is a “bug” that’s gonna kill Americans, but it can’t be agreed upon if terrorists want to mass murder Americans? I don’t get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Bugs can't vote.

Lol. That would be the argument for the elected leaders. I was thinking more on the lines of the general public. People claim racism for banning travel from muslim countries when Trump was trying to keep out terrorists, but if these same muslims have the potential of having this virus, we have no problem banning them, in fact, we didn’t do it fast enough.

Everything for the dims is about the vote. They truly don’t care about working Americans. This is why I will gladly accept my stimulus money if only to keep the dims from getting their grimy hands on it. It is, after all, my money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, baddog said:

Lol. That would be the argument for the elected leaders. I was thinking more on the lines of the general public. People claim racism for banning travel from muslim countries when Trump was trying to keep out terrorists, but if these same muslims have the potential of having this virus, we have no problem banning them, in fact, we didn’t do it fast enough.

Everything for the dims is about the vote. They truly don’t care about working Americans. This is why I will gladly accept my stimulus money if only to keep the dims from getting their grimy hands on it. It is, after all, my money.

I knew what you were getting at...lol.

Agree 100% with this post.  Sadly, everything is about votes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Physical Atmosphere said:

You may have misunderstood the question. The trade agreement and Migrant compact are two different things.

Why would we remain in the newly formed "trade agreement" with Mexico & Canada after they signed the U.N. Migrant Compact ? Isn't that indirectly agreeing to the compact by doing so ? It was the loop hole.

damn what did I miss today?
 

We trade with Mexico and Canada because they are the easiest and cheapest countries we can trade with due to proximity.  


Yes, I agree we need to kick the UN out of New York and let the rest of them pick up the tab we have been paying for many years. 
 

Are you Q?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,883
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    paaro21
    Newest Member
    paaro21
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Really good hire! As I stated previously on this thread, Mike T has been an essential part of WB’s success the last few years & is a student of the game & I have a ton of respect for how he goes about things as a coach. Big on teaching kids how to do things the right way to prepare them for not only basketball but the game of life. He’ll be fine there, my only question is what kind of talent does WB have returning?  Best thing about this situation for Mike T is WB will be 5A for at least the next 2 years, so he should win a lot of games & have some deep playoff runs.
    • So which coaches kid gets the QB job? Trotter or Barrier
    • A Winnie land owner (and others) sued the State of Texas after they built IH-10 a few feet higher in order to help contain storm flooding. Sure enough a hurricane hit and flooded the land. The storm improvements worked!! Unfortunately the state sacrificed several people’s properties in using the interstate highway as a dam.  Richard DeVillier tried to sue Texas under our laws and Constitution and the US Constitution under the Fifth Amendment “taking clause” (eminent domain). After a favorable ruling in the federal district court on the right to sue Texas directly, the Fifth Circuit Court in New Orleans overturned that ruling and said that the DeVlier had no authority to sue Texas directly.  On Tuesday a unanimous US Supreme Court ruled that DeVillier and others had the right to sue Texas directly under Texas law and under the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution. The case is now sent back down to the lower court. DeVillier and others have not won their lawsuits as the case has not been decided on its merits at a trial. He still has to go to prove his case. What they did win was a unanimous Supreme Court agreeing that he has the right to bring Texas to trial for taking his property with just compensation.   
    • Don't jump?!  What?!
    • @Big girl  @UT alum     Amazing, isn't it?!  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...