Jump to content

MIT Biologist Says Caronavirus Will Go Down As Biggest Fraud To Manipulate Economies!


Reagan

Recommended Posts

As Hoops said, somewhere in the middle.   Here’s the Scenarios from my feeble mind.   If we take an (over?)abundance of precautions, we will reduce the death rate substantially.   Then the, “this ain’t nothing crowd” will scream - I told you so.   If you don’t take the precautions, Italy being an example, the death rate percentage will go way up, and Lynch mobs will be after you.  

Monday morning QB’s gonna Monday morning QB regardless of what you do - Football, Politics, Pandemics, all same same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hagar said:

As Hoops said, somewhere in the middle.   Here’s the Scenarios from my feeble mind.   If we take an (over?)abundance of precautions, we will reduce the death rate substantially.   Then the, “this ain’t nothing crowd” will scream - I told you so.   If you don’t take the precautions, Italy being an example, the death rate percentage will go way up, and Lynch mobs will be after you.  

Monday morning QB’s gonna Monday morning QB regardless of what you do - Football, Politics, Pandemics, all same same.

Every day, we are bombarded with stats on Coronavirus. Since we are such a statistical society, why not, when each individual dies from this virus, his/her age is included along with whether or not they had a pre-existing condition, such as diabetes, coronary disease, chemo-patient, and the list goes on. I think that if we are to evaluate the situation with all information possible, we can come to a much better understanding and react accordingly.

Another opinion of mine is that if a person working retail is going to wear disposable gloves to deal with customers, they need to change gloves after every transaction or there is no sense in wearing them in the first place. Just an observation....trying to help.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, baddog said:

Every day, we are bombarded with stats on Coronavirus. Since we are such a statistical society, why not, when each individual dies from this virus, his/her age is included along with whether or not they had a pre-existing condition, such as diabetes, coronary disease, chemo-patient, and the list goes on. I think that if we are to evaluate the situation with all information possible, we can come to a much better understanding and react accordingly.

Another opinion of mine is that if a person working retail is going to wear disposable gloves to deal with customers, they need to change gloves after every transaction or there is no sense in wearing them in the first place. Just an observation....trying to help.

 

I agree more information should be forthcoming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/17/2020 at 7:12 PM, baddog said:

Here is a good comparison.

This is the hidden content, please

 Like Smashmouth pointed out, the total deaths far outweigh the percentages. See, I can post high death rate percentages for the plague, but how many people have it anymore? It is still around.

Mortality rates for treated individuals range from 1 percent to 15 percent for bubonic plague to 40 percent for septicemic plague. In untreated victims, the rates rise to about 50 percent for bubonic and 100 percent for septicemic.

 

When was the bubonic plaque prominent? What century?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/17/2020 at 4:23 PM, baddog said:

When I first did the math a week or so ago, the numbers matched the flu death rate. I will admit that the rate has gone up since then. Being the optimist that I am, I like to say that there is a 98% survival rate. Doesn’t that sound better?

Who in your family are you willing to sacrifice?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Big girl said:

When was the bubonic plaque prominent? What century?

Do you even read, or do you simply jump in with both feet?

How did you like the way your dim comrades blocked the stimulus package because it didn’t have anything in it for the green new deal, or significant raises for congress? See, when the American people can get money to keep them afloat during a crisis, the dims think of themselves first. Isn’t that what you are all about. Monies meant for the needy get siphoned off by the fat cat dims. You should be proud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • 2 months later...
On 3/18/2020 at 12:13 AM, TxHoops said:

This is the point.  We can’t even come close to valid numbers at this stage due to the minimal testing which has been done. There have likely been way more people who have had it than we even know.  
 

This is beyond the great hoax the amateur infectious disease “experts” were spouting even a few days ago.  It’s also likely way less than the gloom and doomers were preaching.   Like most things, the truth will likely be in the middle.  
 

As I was told last week by a couple of different friends who are in the field, some of us will get it, and almost everyone will know several people who contract it.  And most will even know someone who didn’t survive it.  But we will get past it.  It just likely won’t be as soon as most hope. 

Well, I’ve known 3 people in the last week to 10 days who have died and one of those has their spouse still in the hospital on a vent.  Quite a hoax...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, TxHoops said:

Well, I’ve known 3 people in the last week to 10 days who have died and one of those has their spouse still in the hospital on a vent.  Quite a hoax...

Yep. Definitely not a hoax. I pray for them and their families. Condolences to all.
Here are some important questions though:

How did they get it? Did they wear masks? Limit their exposure?

How old and/or frail were they? What underlying conditions did they possess?

Did any of them receive the malaria drug hydroxychloroquine, zinc and z pack before or after exposure?

Could they or doctors done anything differently to allow them to survive this sickness?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The death mortality rate is well under 1% for the United States. IMO I think he’s right in his prediction. IMO the way States have put in draconian measures to manage the virus is a hoax. Think about it, when in U.S history have we ever quarantined 95 percent of the population which was healthy? Uh....Never! I understand the high risk population being quarantined which is probably 5 to 10 percent of the population. The MIT guy is not far off IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, TxHoops said:

Well, I’ve known 3 people in the last week to 10 days who have died and one of those has their spouse still in the hospital on a vent.  Quite a hoax...

It’s not a hoax, it’s an overreaction. 
 

2% of Hardin County has tested positive. With ten deaths to date (10/48,000 residents) its already wiped out 0.00020833 of the population here. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, myrecordwashorrible said:

CardinalBacker, how dare you utilize data that doesn't fit the narrative!  You utilized long division, oh the horror. You've gone rogue. 

Don't you know the motto?  We have to do something!  Doesn't matter if it makes sense to do so, we simply must do something.

Remember what Rahm Emmanual (socialist that worked for clinton and obama) said:  " never let a good crisis go to waste!"   I wonder what he meant by that?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...