Jump to content

MIT Biologist Says Caronavirus Will Go Down As Biggest Fraud To Manipulate Economies!


Reagan

Recommended Posts

As Hoops said, somewhere in the middle.   Here’s the Scenarios from my feeble mind.   If we take an (over?)abundance of precautions, we will reduce the death rate substantially.   Then the, “this ain’t nothing crowd” will scream - I told you so.   If you don’t take the precautions, Italy being an example, the death rate percentage will go way up, and Lynch mobs will be after you.  

Monday morning QB’s gonna Monday morning QB regardless of what you do - Football, Politics, Pandemics, all same same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hagar said:

As Hoops said, somewhere in the middle.   Here’s the Scenarios from my feeble mind.   If we take an (over?)abundance of precautions, we will reduce the death rate substantially.   Then the, “this ain’t nothing crowd” will scream - I told you so.   If you don’t take the precautions, Italy being an example, the death rate percentage will go way up, and Lynch mobs will be after you.  

Monday morning QB’s gonna Monday morning QB regardless of what you do - Football, Politics, Pandemics, all same same.

Every day, we are bombarded with stats on Coronavirus. Since we are such a statistical society, why not, when each individual dies from this virus, his/her age is included along with whether or not they had a pre-existing condition, such as diabetes, coronary disease, chemo-patient, and the list goes on. I think that if we are to evaluate the situation with all information possible, we can come to a much better understanding and react accordingly.

Another opinion of mine is that if a person working retail is going to wear disposable gloves to deal with customers, they need to change gloves after every transaction or there is no sense in wearing them in the first place. Just an observation....trying to help.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, baddog said:

Every day, we are bombarded with stats on Coronavirus. Since we are such a statistical society, why not, when each individual dies from this virus, his/her age is included along with whether or not they had a pre-existing condition, such as diabetes, coronary disease, chemo-patient, and the list goes on. I think that if we are to evaluate the situation with all information possible, we can come to a much better understanding and react accordingly.

Another opinion of mine is that if a person working retail is going to wear disposable gloves to deal with customers, they need to change gloves after every transaction or there is no sense in wearing them in the first place. Just an observation....trying to help.

 

I agree more information should be forthcoming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/17/2020 at 7:12 PM, baddog said:

Here is a good comparison.

This is the hidden content, please

 Like Smashmouth pointed out, the total deaths far outweigh the percentages. See, I can post high death rate percentages for the plague, but how many people have it anymore? It is still around.

Mortality rates for treated individuals range from 1 percent to 15 percent for bubonic plague to 40 percent for septicemic plague. In untreated victims, the rates rise to about 50 percent for bubonic and 100 percent for septicemic.

 

When was the bubonic plaque prominent? What century?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/17/2020 at 4:23 PM, baddog said:

When I first did the math a week or so ago, the numbers matched the flu death rate. I will admit that the rate has gone up since then. Being the optimist that I am, I like to say that there is a 98% survival rate. Doesn’t that sound better?

Who in your family are you willing to sacrifice?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Big girl said:

When was the bubonic plaque prominent? What century?

Do you even read, or do you simply jump in with both feet?

How did you like the way your dim comrades blocked the stimulus package because it didn’t have anything in it for the green new deal, or significant raises for congress? See, when the American people can get money to keep them afloat during a crisis, the dims think of themselves first. Isn’t that what you are all about. Monies meant for the needy get siphoned off by the fat cat dims. You should be proud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • 2 months later...
On 3/18/2020 at 12:13 AM, TxHoops said:

This is the point.  We can’t even come close to valid numbers at this stage due to the minimal testing which has been done. There have likely been way more people who have had it than we even know.  
 

This is beyond the great hoax the amateur infectious disease “experts” were spouting even a few days ago.  It’s also likely way less than the gloom and doomers were preaching.   Like most things, the truth will likely be in the middle.  
 

As I was told last week by a couple of different friends who are in the field, some of us will get it, and almost everyone will know several people who contract it.  And most will even know someone who didn’t survive it.  But we will get past it.  It just likely won’t be as soon as most hope. 

Well, I’ve known 3 people in the last week to 10 days who have died and one of those has their spouse still in the hospital on a vent.  Quite a hoax...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, TxHoops said:

Well, I’ve known 3 people in the last week to 10 days who have died and one of those has their spouse still in the hospital on a vent.  Quite a hoax...

Yep. Definitely not a hoax. I pray for them and their families. Condolences to all.
Here are some important questions though:

How did they get it? Did they wear masks? Limit their exposure?

How old and/or frail were they? What underlying conditions did they possess?

Did any of them receive the malaria drug hydroxychloroquine, zinc and z pack before or after exposure?

Could they or doctors done anything differently to allow them to survive this sickness?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The death mortality rate is well under 1% for the United States. IMO I think he’s right in his prediction. IMO the way States have put in draconian measures to manage the virus is a hoax. Think about it, when in U.S history have we ever quarantined 95 percent of the population which was healthy? Uh....Never! I understand the high risk population being quarantined which is probably 5 to 10 percent of the population. The MIT guy is not far off IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, TxHoops said:

Well, I’ve known 3 people in the last week to 10 days who have died and one of those has their spouse still in the hospital on a vent.  Quite a hoax...

It’s not a hoax, it’s an overreaction. 
 

2% of Hardin County has tested positive. With ten deaths to date (10/48,000 residents) its already wiped out 0.00020833 of the population here. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, myrecordwashorrible said:

CardinalBacker, how dare you utilize data that doesn't fit the narrative!  You utilized long division, oh the horror. You've gone rogue. 

Don't you know the motto?  We have to do something!  Doesn't matter if it makes sense to do so, we simply must do something.

Remember what Rahm Emmanual (socialist that worked for clinton and obama) said:  " never let a good crisis go to waste!"   I wonder what he meant by that?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,937
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • 3 yrs ago LCM and Vidor played in Vidor for a play in game.  Game was on a Saturday and started around 1 or 2p.
    • It would shock me beyond belief if he tried to. Now, I hope and pray he appoints people that will investigate, charge, and imprison anyone found guilty of the crimes against him...including treason. I would be all for a special task force charged solely with the task of investigating crimes against Trump. Of course the Democrats will be screaming bloody murder that Trump is weaponizing the government against them. We all know the story. From a cursory standpoint, there seems to be a plethora of evidence to lock up many Democrats for a long time. Unless this is done, I see no end to destruction of our political system...and this country.
    • There is a difference, but I wouldn't at all put it past Trump to do so if he had the infrastructure in place to get away with it like the Dems currently do.  With the amount of effort he's invested in ruining those republicans who've opposed him, it wouldn't surprise me one bit.
    • I think it will be an interesting case and could potentially come up for appeal on a different constitutional point.  The Supreme Court has ruled in the past that the government doesn’t have to take possession of property in order to take it under the meaning of the Fifth Amendment.  If they take away the enjoyment or use of the property, it is no different than physically seizing it to build a highway for example. In a lawsuit as opposed to a criminal trial, a person/plaintiff doesn’t have to prove something beyond a reasonable doubt but rather by a preponderance of evidence or “more likely” to have happened. Maybe it could be described as more likely yes than no or 51%-49%.  ”IF” it can be shown at a trial by a preponderance of evidence that Texas more likely yes than no caused the flooding with its engineering of the project, the people suing might have a case. But…. Does that alone win the case under the Fifth Amendment taking clause? I am not so sure. In US v Causby the Supreme Court ruled that the US government took a man’s property by flying airplanes over it. It was a public airport lawfully leased by the US in WWII and used to fly heavy bombers from it. Causby had an egg farm and the extremely loud noise of some airplanes under full power and sometimes at night with a landing lights being so close, it bothered and scared the family and damaged his egg farm production. Some chickens died and some quit laying eggs due to the extreme disturbances and lights at night. The Supreme Court ruled in Causby’s favor saying that the US had taken away the enjoyment and use of his land even though they didn’t physically seize it. The use of the land was hampered and that was enough for the taking clause under the Fifth Amendment. So in the IH-10 case, did Texas take away the use or enjoyment of the property?  A point of Causby was that the military bombers at a public airport was certainly for “public use”. The planes were public/taxpayers’ and the airport and lease were taxpayers’ property so the “public” definitely used it   My question in this lawsuit against Texas, even in they can prove the damage, was the damage (like in Causby) for “public use”? If not would it then not be a Fifth Amendment case but rather a state law case?  If Texas law denies such a lawsuit under state sovereignty and the families can’t prove a Fifth Amendment case of “public use”, could they prove the damages but still lose the case under state law? I haven’t read that anywhere and just thinking out loud. I could be way off base. But I think it could be interesting…..
    • Both sides...that is, everyone tries to get their people elected. Trump has not weaponized the government to bankrupt and imprison his political opponents. Night and day difference for me.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...