Jump to content

BI-DISTRICT PLAYOFF MATCHUPS/POST INFO HERE!


WOSgrad

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

2/14/2019

United v. North Shore 

Seeding game

@ LaPorte HS, 7:00 pm.

Interesting, the winner will be awarded the District championship I assume. Otherwise playing a seeding game to determine  playing a team with a district record of  11-5 or 12-4 has its risks considering Northshore is a rivalry game..jmo 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, JustUs said:

Interesting, the winner will be awarded the District championship I assume. Otherwise playing a seeding game to determine  playing a team with a district record of  11-5 or 12-4 has its risks considering Northshore is a rivalry game..jmo 

It's funny.  I was always under the impression that if you have a tie for 1st, no matter what happens, it CO-district champs and the play in game is ONLY  for seeding and first round playoff opponent.  However, I have gotten word from someone who's talked to both Coach Brown and Coach Campbell that this is indeed for the outright district championship.  So now, I'm a bit confused now.  I guess until otherwise stated, for now, this is a seeding ONLY game.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

It's funny.  I was always under the impression that if you have a tie for 1st, no matter what happens, it CO-district champs and the play in game is ONLY  for seeding and first round playoff opponent.  However, I have gotten word from someone who's talked to both Coach Brown and Coach Campbell that this is indeed for the outright district championship.  So now, I'm a bit confused now.  I guess until otherwise stated, for now, this is a seeding ONLY game.  

You are correct by rule teams that are tied at the end of regular season shall be considered Co-district champions, normally any game played is for seeding purposes.

However somewhere in those rules if both coaches agree the winner can be declared District champions. That gray area is a mystery. If you find it share it....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,892
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    corixek265
    Newest Member
    corixek265
    Joined


  • Posts

    • That’s a president? How embarrassing. 
    • Really good hire! As I stated previously on this thread, Mike T has been an essential part of WB’s success the last few years & is a student of the game & I have a ton of respect for how he goes about things as a coach. Big on teaching kids how to do things the right way to prepare them for not only basketball but the game of life. He’ll be fine there, my only question is what kind of talent does WB have returning?  Best thing about this situation for Mike T is WB will be 5A for at least the next 2 years, so he should win a lot of games & have some deep playoff runs.
    • So which coaches kid gets the QB job? Trotter or Barrier
    • A Winnie land owner (and others) sued the State of Texas after they built IH-10 a few feet higher in order to help contain storm flooding. Sure enough a hurricane hit and flooded the land. The storm improvements worked!! Unfortunately the state sacrificed several people’s properties in using the interstate highway as a dam.  Richard DeVillier tried to sue Texas under our laws and Constitution and the US Constitution under the Fifth Amendment “taking clause” (eminent domain). After a favorable ruling in the federal district court on the right to sue Texas directly, the Fifth Circuit Court in New Orleans overturned that ruling and said that the DeVlier had no authority to sue Texas directly.  On Tuesday a unanimous US Supreme Court ruled that DeVillier and others had the right to sue Texas directly under Texas law and under the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution. The case is now sent back down to the lower court. DeVillier and others have not won their lawsuits as the case has not been decided on its merits at a trial. He still has to go to prove his case. What they did win was a unanimous Supreme Court agreeing that he has the right to bring Texas to trial for taking his property with just compensation.   
    • Don't jump?!  What?!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...