Jump to content

Port Arthur Memorial 56 Nederland 39/FINAL


WOSgrad

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, Golden_Tri-409 said:

i watch demeanor  and that had quit and no fight all over it....quit making excuses for kids who don't have it. Without the refs he may not have the 14 he had in the game. Like i said earlier i've watched him a lot of times and he doesn't have it like a lot of y'all say he does. He may bite when the little pups come to play but when the big dogs show up he only barks.Call it what you want but i see it how it is. English did get out coached y'all right about that but what do you do when the other team is too strong.

I think @BMTSoulja1 been saying this for 3 years now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stevenash said:

Soulja, while this is off topic, I thought I would inform you of the following.   The HJ Hamshire game wound up being a 3 pt game and, as ALWAYS, the reliable indicator, the dunk count, was 1-0 in favor of HJ, thus accurately predicting the outcome

It was 1-0 Nederl..err, Hefner the Quitter 🙄, so the indicator was off tonight

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, stevenash said:

Soulja, while this is off topic, I thought I would inform you of the following.   The HJ Hamshire game wound up being a 3 pt game and, as ALWAYS, the reliable indicator, the dunk count, was 1-0 in favor of HJ, thus accurately predicting the outcome

See there?  The dunk count is the most important stat there is and should be effectively highlighted in every post game analysis....  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, gogo1734 said:

Just because you read it on the internet doesn't make it true...

Well, I never said it was true, but usually when an untruth comes out, there's always someone to dismiss it as false, usually with supporting facts or a confirmation from someone very credible.  I've seen neither thus far...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here my opinion on Hefner.

1.Very skill player

2.High Basketball IQ

3.Great Vertical

4.Need to work on shooting

5.Need to work on being physical

Look he will be fine at AGGIE LAND because he has skill.You guys should watch the top 25 juco teams and its players what I saw last night on both teams was some good juco talent regardless of where anyone sign up at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

Well, I never said it was true, but usually when an untruth comes out, there's always someone to dismiss it as false, usually with supporting facts or a confirmation from someone very credible.  I've seen neither this far...

Why would that be needed? So you're telling me I could say anything about anyone, and its up to them to disprove my statement? No matter how asinine it may be? C'mon man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, JMAY88 said:

B.Bush best in Setx hands down if he was 6"4 he be a lottery pick.

Silly statement, he’s not 6’4”. 
 

That’s like saying Larry Bird would be the GOAT if he had LeBron’s athletic ability, or #16 from Vidor would be the best if he had Bush’s mind set and Anthony Davis’s height. 
 

He doesn’t....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's be clear on my opinion of Hefner as a player. He's deserving of the scholarship to A&M. He was the most physically gifted and skilled athlete on the court last night. But he was not the best player on the court last night. He has to pick up his level of aggression. It's okay to float around and let the game come to you against lesser competition. But against tougher competition he has to take the lead. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Off topic, but there is a difference between best player and most athletic player.  I thought that's what initially came up on this topic. With all due respect to this thread (Nederland and PA), I won't bring up any other players..  But I'll say that the Nederland kid  is neither the best player or the most athletic player I SETX, but he's in the top 5 of both, IMO.  

With respect to Heffner, I know he's a smart kid to have gotten the  offer from A&M and I hear he's kicking arse  academically.  With that said, I know for a fact he'll thrive out there next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Member Statistics

    45,932
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Newest Member
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comment were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...