Jump to content

Astros Penalty


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, mat said:

The problem is, how far would you want the net be thrown. Would it include just the players that participated which may be difficult to prove or would it include the entire team who probably had knowledge? Do you punish someone for just not being a whistle blower? I think it would get very messy to single out those most guilty.

I'm not worried about getting messy, it needs to get messy to send a message to everyone in MLB.  I do agree that it would be almost impossible to prove who did or did not participate in the cheating.  You could eliminate all pitchers from the astros since the cheating happened at home games only.  After that it's all speculation unless a player admits to it.  

I would like to know how this all came about.  Why was the camera put in?  Who put the camera in?  Who decided to use it and who came up with the system?  Alex Cora has been outed as the mastermind, but did he do it alone?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, NetCat said:

I feel like there's probably been people doing this since the 80's when cameras got good enough to do it. Anybody else feel this way?

Yes, thank you. Sign stealing is 100% by every team. Why does a catcher give the sign hidden between his legs? Why do they change signals when an opposing runner is on 2nd base? It happens. I think the sophistication of the system is what got the Stros in so much trouble, plus the WS ring and another appearance......in which they LOST EVERY HOME GAME. So how advantageous was it really? Wasn’t it 2 years ago that the Stros were ROAD WARRIORS?

I still don’t know how to feel about this. Every game this year we are going to see “Cheater” signs in the stands. But hey, the Patriots survived, so “Let’s Go Astros!”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, baddog said:

Yes, thank you. Sign stealing is 100% by every team. Why does a catcher give the sign hidden between his legs? Why do they change signals when an opposing runner is on 2nd base? It happens. I think the sophistication of the system is what got the Stros in so much trouble, plus the WS ring and another appearance......in which they LOST EVERY HOME GAME. So how advantageous was it really? Wasn’t it 2 years ago that the Stros were ROAD WARRIORS?

I still don’t know how to feel about this. Every game this year we are going to see “Cheater” signs in the stands. But hey, the Patriots survived, so “Let’s Go Astros!”

Good post, I'm with you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Come on guys, don’t try to make this ok by saying everyone does it. There’s a huge difference in sign stealing on the field and using technology to do so. If the catcher is dumb enough to put 1 finger down while I’m on 2nd, that’s on him and is part of the game. If I’m using a camera in centerfield to show the signs of the catcher then using some other form of technology in the dugout to receive those signs, that’s cheating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Ty Cobb said:

Come on guys, don’t try to make this ok by saying everyone does it. There’s a huge difference in sign stealing on the field and using technology to do so. If the catcher is dumb enough to put 1 finger down while I’m on 2nd, that’s on him and is part of the game. If I’m using a camera in centerfield to show the signs of the catcher then using some other form of technology in the dugout to receive those signs, that’s cheating.

I don't think that's what they're saying...that's not what I'm saying anyways. It is cheating, end of story. I just don't think that the ones who were caught were the only ones doing it. I feel like there should be more of an investigation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see this being a wide spread issue across MLB due to free agency and players constantly moving from team to team.  Too many people would talk if they knew this was happening.  It only takes one unhappy player or member of the organization to expose this type of cheating scandal.  Maybe I'm wrong but it seems to risky to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,885
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    bongomu
    Newest Member
    bongomu
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Really good hire! As I stated previously on this thread, Mike T has been an essential part of WB’s success the last few years & is a student of the game & I have a ton of respect for how he goes about things as a coach. Big on teaching kids how to do things the right way to prepare them for not only basketball but the game of life. He’ll be fine there, my only question is what kind of talent does WB have returning?  Best thing about this situation for Mike T is WB will be 5A for at least the next 2 years, so he should win a lot of games & have some deep playoff runs.
    • So which coaches kid gets the QB job? Trotter or Barrier
    • A Winnie land owner (and others) sued the State of Texas after they built IH-10 a few feet higher in order to help contain storm flooding. Sure enough a hurricane hit and flooded the land. The storm improvements worked!! Unfortunately the state sacrificed several people’s properties in using the interstate highway as a dam.  Richard DeVillier tried to sue Texas under our laws and Constitution and the US Constitution under the Fifth Amendment “taking clause” (eminent domain). After a favorable ruling in the federal district court on the right to sue Texas directly, the Fifth Circuit Court in New Orleans overturned that ruling and said that the DeVlier had no authority to sue Texas directly.  On Tuesday a unanimous US Supreme Court ruled that DeVillier and others had the right to sue Texas directly under Texas law and under the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution. The case is now sent back down to the lower court. DeVillier and others have not won their lawsuits as the case has not been decided on its merits at a trial. He still has to go to prove his case. What they did win was a unanimous Supreme Court agreeing that he has the right to bring Texas to trial for taking his property with just compensation.   
    • Don't jump?!  What?!
    • @Big girl  @UT alum     Amazing, isn't it?!  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...