Jump to content

Lake Charles Holiday Tournament


Who That

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

Lol.  More than likely, a rematch with LaGrange if they won their game...

Have you seen a revised bracket,  the one listed above is the same I have seen elsewhere and it had LaGrange playing where they would have faced United tomorrow.  But we faced the team and evidently played at the time LaGrange was supposed to play. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ST413 said:

Have you seen a revised bracket,  the one listed above is the same I have seen elsewhere and it had LaGrange playing where they would have faced United tomorrow.  But we faced the team and evidently played at the time LaGrange was supposed to play. 

Well, I'm going solely off the bracket posted on this forum by AAW.  So there was a revision? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Hooohead.com said:

They play the winner of Marrion Houston vs LaGrange

Just going by what was posted as a result of our game by someone who should know.  It was posted that we lost to Marion and was posted at about 6 when we were scheduled to play lccp at 7.  LaGrange was scheduled to play Marion at 4:30.  By our posted result it looks like we took LaGranges spot in that game.  I have no other confirmation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ST413 said:

Just going by what was posted as a result of our game by someone who should know.  It was posted that we lost to Marion and was posted at about 6 when we were scheduled to play lccp at 7.  LaGrange was scheduled to play Marion at 4:30.  By our posted result it looks like we took LaGranges spot in that game.  I have no other confirmation.

I don't know..  I just know that United did play who they were scheduled to play and at the scheduled time. 

Kasen Harrison: 16 pts

Glenn Bibbins : 12 pts

Tyrese Baker : 12 pts

Kendris Henry : 9 pts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ST413 said:

Looks like LaGrange wanted to avoid United as long as possible,  they just switched places with us in the bracket.

I don't know if that's their intention. Or if they are allowed to even do that. It's crazy.  We beat them by 30 in the first meeting.. If they really did that, then those guys really are chicken 'you know what'...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

I don't know if that's their intention. Or if they are allowed to even do that. It's crazy.  We beat them by 30 in the first meeting.. If they really did that, then those guys really are chicken 'you know what'...

The first bracket is above in the tourney thread.  This one is posted on the school(Lagrange) Facebook page.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,926
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Newest Member
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Joined



  • Posts

    • That there’s not a single thread on the fact that the Republican nominee is on trial for paying off a porn star with whom he had an affair while the future First Lady was carrying said nominee’s child.    I remember back when the dirty, no-good Dems sacked Gary Hart over something similar. Same thing with John Edwards and later Anthony Weiner.    But y’all keep pretending God is on your side, lol. 
    • I hear what you’re saying, BUT… that hammers the hell out of poor people and the ones with multiple properties don’t eat any more than the poor ones. In fact, you’d basically just be taxing a lot of peoples’ EBT payments. The government  can’t get ahead by taxing what they’re already borrowing to give to people.    I think well off people should pay more… but the scale as it exists is broken.    For the sake of argument, my mom’s house in Groves is valued at $125k. 2/1/1 on a slab.  Her tax bill is $850/year. Without exemptions, her bill would be 3200. It’s right on JCAD’s website. The problem is this…. If someone tries to rent out an identical house, they’d expect to get, what… $1200/month? If you take into account that homeowners/windstorm/flood is a minimum of another $2k per year, you’d need $5k a year just to cover the taxes and insurance. That’s four months (1/3 of the year) just to cover those costs, not counting a potential mortgage payment. But then everybody cries about how expensive rents are… you can’t tax the hell out of non-homestead property to make up for gifts given to homeowners in the form of big tax cuts. It just doesn’t work.    Ten acres in Lumberton? I’ve got a buddy with 10 acres in Lumberton on HWY 69. Prime property… it’s his retirement plan. Sale it one day and cash in. The CAD decided that it no longer qualifies for a special use valuation (timber) and stripped his “exemption.” His 2023 tax bill jumped from $25 to $22,000…. It’s insane.  
    • I’m curious what happened… they aren’t even in full pads yet. 
    • They’re going to have win almost all remaining games and get finals of tournament to think about an at-large. When LU was in the WAC, Grand Canyon got an at-large after New Mexico St came out of nowhere to win conference tournament. Grand Canyon had a dang good resume that year. It can happen, but resume wise isn’t in their favor.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...