Jump to content

Silsbee Vs Wimberley

Who That

By Who That
in High School Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

STiger85

STiger85

Posted
Posted
22 hours ago, JimThorpe said:

Wimbo deserves to be the favorite because they trounced a team with better rushing stats than Silsbee.  Navarro was averaging 411 ypg rusing.  They had two more or less 1000 yard rushers and a 2000 yard rusher in a fairly strong district.  Wimbo handled them with apparent ease last week.  Why shouldn't they be able to do pretty much the same thing against Silsbee?

And we don't even know what will happen with Wimbo's passing.  Silsbee hasn't faced an air attack like Wimbo's all year, or last year either for that matter.  You've got to figure they will probably get around 400 yards of total offense.

So on paper Wimbo has to get the nod.  A 3pt spread is more than fair.  

But .  The game before Navarro against Rockport game is very interesting.  Rockport seems to be all run.  Team stats show 32 passing yards per game and rushing ypg similar to Silsbee.  And they played Wimbo even all the way down the line.  Looks like an extra point in the 4th quarter was the difference. 

 

 

Yes we have, and we learned from it and moved personal around. I don't think Wimbo has a passing attack like Springhill did against us. So, lets see what happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 271
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

BMTSoulja1
BMTSoulja1

I'm interested to see how Wimberley stops the power run game.  If they can't slow that down from the jump, then Wimberley is in serious trouble.... People aren't talking about this but that o-Line has

griff
griff

No doubt about that. Wimberley has the big play passing potential that Cuero didn't have, but Wimberley does NOT have as good a defense nor a superstar do everything player like Whittington (but no on

Gasilla
Gasilla

One thing you have to keep in mind that you mention is that they play no one with the speed anywhere close to what Silsbee will bring to the table. They havent seen it and they cant duplicate it in pr

Majestyk

Majestyk

Posted
Posted

Silsbee wins this game. It's probably going to be a barn burner tho. The Tigers schedule have them tested and ready. They will not get out-athleted. When WO-S played Wimberly in '17 they had a QB who was like 7'6" and threw for 4 or 5 miles, don't think he's still there but it won't matter. I know they don't have an alien on their roster like Cuero did. Good luck Tigers, do us proud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WimberleyD1

WimberleyD1

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, Who That said:

I'm about to post your real name .. So everyone can look you up.. And I promise I can buy any room and buy everything you own young man. 

Post it then. If you are displeased with this “trolling”. Do a bit better next season regarding your online discussion of others. They might be reading along, and may have a bit of concise dialogue to add. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Who That

Who That

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, WimberleyD1 said:

Post it then. If you are displeased with this “trolling”. Do a bit better next season regarding your online discussion of others. They might be reading along, and may have a bit of concise dialogue to add. 

Find one thing on hear where I said anything bad about Wimberley until you got on here.  I never even gave a prediction on this game. We new yall would be good are yall wouldn't be their. And if we would of won I promise you you wouldn't see us on a Wimberley site talking mess to yalls fans. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Who That

Who That

Posted
  • Author
Posted

But like I said if this make s you feel good go ahead ... And like I said maybe we can meet up in a nice Basketball match this year yall have alot of height shouldn't be a problem to make a deep run in the playoffs... But I" promise you you will get that A$$ beat all the way back to Wimberley ‼

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WimberleyD1

WimberleyD1

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, Who That said:

Find one thing on hear where I said anything bad about Wimberley until you got on here.  I never even gave a prediction on this game. We new yall would be good are yall wouldn't be their. And if we would of won I promise you you wouldn't see us on a Wimberley site talking mess to yalls fans. 

? I suggest you do the same and look back through my comments. I have typed absolute nothing vulgar or offensive to anyone. I have not eluded to any of your players being homosexual or that our community is “homosexual”. I’m going to guess that you, personally, had no part. However, that isn’t the reality of this weeks discussion. I know Thus  because I have ready this. I’m sure you are a very respectful person. I’m sure most are. However, a bit of “trolling” as it’s been called is warranted, in my opinion. Ample amounts of giving on this thread, not so great at taking. 
In the end, I don’t want to be rude. You guys have a great team and program. The point of this is to point out that perhaps you can give a bit of respect as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WimberleyD1

WimberleyD1

Posted
Posted
Just now, WimberleyD1 said:

? I suggest you do the same and look back through my comments. I have typed absolute nothing vulgar or offensive to anyone. I have not eluded to any of your players being homosexual or that our community is “homosexual”. I’m going to guess that you, personally, had no part. However, that isn’t the reality of this weeks discussion. I know Thus  because I have ready this. I’m sure you are a very respectful person. I’m sure most are. However, a bit of “trolling” as it’s been called is warranted, in my opinion. Ample amounts of giving on this thread, not so great at taking. 
In the end, I don’t want to be rude. You guys have a great team and program. The point of this is to point out that perhaps you can give a bit of respect as well. 

One guy posted that Christian Marshall #9 being knocked out was with the 10 bucks of admission. He’s 16 years old. A junior in a high school. Another stated that he and our QB are homosexual. Honestly, a bit of trolling is what’s prescribed here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Who That

Who That

Posted
  • Author
Posted
10 minutes ago, WimberleyD1 said:

One guy posted that Christian Marshall #9 being knocked out was with the 10 bucks of admission. He’s 16 years old. A junior in a high school. Another stated that he and our QB are homosexual. Honestly, a bit of trolling is what’s prescribed here. 

It was" And man did you see it.. It was like he got hit with a truck. 😂🤣 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BADSANTA

BADSANTA

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, WimberleyD1 said:

One guy posted that Christian Marshall #9 being knocked out was with the 10 bucks of admission. He’s 16 years old. A junior in a high school. Another stated that he and our QB are homosexual. Honestly, a bit of trolling is what’s prescribed here. 

How is #9? I was right there at the 50 yard line. He took a massive hit man. He stumbled when he got up as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,900
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    adline
    Newest Member
    adline
    Joined


  • Posts

    • idk
      Liberty is Open

      By idk · Posted

      How do you know that Harrison is not a big opportunity? I don't really know him, but maybe just maybe he is what Liberty needs. I was just wondering what you know about Harrison that doesn't make him a big opportunity. 
    • Mr. Thornton Melon
      Liberty is Open

      By Mr. Thornton Melon · Posted

      This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • 5GallonBucket
      Vivek interview with Rubin

      By 5GallonBucket · Posted

      The last 2 or so minutes are so true
    • tvc184
      US Supreme Court case from southeast Texas

      By tvc184 · Posted

      Looking back at the exact wording, it seems like you are correct and it was the concrete barriers that were the ultimate problem. I mentioned it in my last comment, even if it was just the barriers, did Texas take his property? I think a case like US v. Causby might go a long way to proving his case. Causby had an egg farm and during World War II, the US government started flying four engine heavy bombers for the war effort, low over his farm at full power. The extremely loud noise killed a bunch of his chickens and caused many of the rest of them to quit laying eggs. Even though he legally still on the property, he sued, saying that the federal government had effectively “taken” the use of his property from him. The US Supreme Court sided with him, saying that for the purposes of the Fifth Amendment, the federal government had indeed taken away the use of his property. It wasn’t intentional but that didn’t matter. It seems like this case would fall somewhere along those lines.
    • tvc184
      US Supreme Court case from southeast Texas

      By tvc184 · Posted

      That might have added to it but it said that they intentionally raised the roadway to help it act as a dam. Even if it was the dividers and no intent, did the state “take” his property without compensation? I think that it is interesting that a local landowner fought his case all the way to the US Supreme Court and won in a unanimous decision. So while he has not won his case yet, he won the right to have his day in court and possibly heard by a jury.     

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...