Jump to content

WO-S vs Silsbee


WOSdrummer99

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

Weather effects both teams and benefits NO ONE.  Smh.  It's all about preparation and execution...

I tried to reply earlier but it didn’t happen.  I don’t think there is a clear cut benefit to either team.  Even with a passing team the DB can slip and leave the WR open.

It does add an element of luck or it wouldn’t be talked about so much with NFL games where the money (betting) matters.

I do think the better team won in the playoffs in 2018 and I do feel WOS got a little lucky in the regular season in 2018.  I feel WOS is slightly the better team this year.  For both teams sake, I hope the weather doesn’t chime in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is cool the back and forth between fans, this thread may be among the all time big ones before it's done. Bottom line of course I'm pulling for WO-S, but if it happens like last year I cry in my...uh...milk for 30 minutes and then I'm full tilt Tigers. That's why this is fun. On a footnote I really do appreciate the SETX gang. If I was registered on another board I might be in prison now. Just sayin.  WO-S  24.  Silsbee 20.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Always fun to look back.

Preseason 4A DII

1)Pleasant Grove
2)Jasper out
3)Silsbee
4)Cuero out
5)West Orange-Stark
6)Waco Connally out
7)Gilmer
8)Lorena out
9)Graham out
10)Lubbock Estacado out

Currently

1)Pleasant Grove (12-1)
2)Waco Connally (12-1) out
3)West Orange-Stark (10-1)
4)Midland Greenwood (13-0)
5)Lubbock Estacado (12-1) out
6)Gilmer (10-3)
7)Sunnyvale (12-1) out
8)Geronimo Navarro (13-0)
9)Iowa Park (12-1)
10)Jasper (8-2) out

Wimberley (10-3)
Silsbee (8-4)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally think you can throw both teams records out the window and what happened last year or even in the district game From earlier in the year too. This is a rivalry and both teams will be prepared and ready for war and both wants it bad . I think it will come down to who makes the least amount of mistakes and who can keep their head straight and excel from the pressure and the hype. Either way the 409 will go on and i will pull for whichever advances. Go tigers !!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, wo-s#1 said:

They closed ...I couldn’t get in,he’s vip like that I guess!

I'm wo-s#1 I can go anytime. I talk with the coaches too.i have to say this. When ppl mention those closed practices.mainly abt keeping these young kids paying attention to details. We have to remember how young these kids are. So u do what u have to keep them focused. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/30/2019 at 11:29 PM, AggiesAreWe said:

One thing going for Silsbee, they have never lost to WO-S in the playoffs.

Well, Alabama's last five losses have come from teams names the Tigers - Clemson, Auburn, and LSU. I guess Silsbee would do the same. SMH...

Silsbee winning playoff games in past years against WO-S has as much significance as Alabama's losses to Tiger teams. If Silsbee wins, it will have everything to do with outplaying the Mustangs. Nothing else. 

Three things going for WO-S...

1) Silsbee lost to WO-S a few weeks ago. Yeah...head to head match ups mean more than who beat common opponents by a bigger point spread. 

2) Silsbee managed only one sustained drive against WO-S the whole game and was held to 7 points (meaningless safety on the game's final snap). The Chain Gang defense is doing it's thing. 

3) WO-S' offense has improved since the first game. Finally getting several consecutive games in after weather interruptions and the bye week have lifted the offense's production and helped gain consistency. Some valuable JV call ups have contributed, too.   

Silsbee manages to beat WO-S only once every ten years. They met their quota last year. WO-S marches on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, griff said:

Well, Alabama's last five losses have come from teams names the Tigers - Clemson, Auburn, and LSU. I guess Silsbee would do the same. SMH...

Silsbee winning playoff games in past years against WO-S has as much significance as Alabama's losses to Tiger teams. If Silsbee wins, it will have everything to do with outplaying the Mustangs. Nothing else. 

Three things going for WO-S...

1) Silsbee lost to WO-S a few weeks ago. Yeah...head to head match ups mean more than who beat common opponents by a bigger point spread. 

2) Silsbee managed only one sustained drive against WO-S the whole game and was held to 7 points (meaningless safety on the game's final snap). The Chain Gang defense is doing it's thing. 

3) WO-S' offense has improved since the first game. Finally getting several consecutive games in after weather interruptions and the bye week have lifted the offense's production and helped gain consistency. Some valuable JV call ups have contributed, too.   

Silsbee manages to beat WO-S only once every ten years. They met their quota last year. WO-S marches on. 

Lol.  They March on will be limping back?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, griff said:

Well, Alabama's last five losses have come from teams names the Tigers - Clemson, Auburn, and LSU. I guess Silsbee would do the same. SMH...

Silsbee winning playoff games in past years against WO-S has as much significance as Alabama's losses to Tiger teams. If Silsbee wins, it will have everything to do with outplaying the Mustangs. Nothing else. 

Three things going for WO-S...

1) Silsbee lost to WO-S a few weeks ago. Yeah...head to head match ups mean more than who beat common opponents by a bigger point spread. 

2) Silsbee managed only one sustained drive against WO-S the whole game and was held to 7 points (meaningless safety on the game's final snap). The Chain Gang defense is doing it's thing. 

3) WO-S' offense has improved since the first game. Finally getting several consecutive games in after weather interruptions and the bye week have lifted the offense's production and helped gain consistency. Some valuable JV call ups have contributed, too.   

Silsbee manages to beat WO-S only once every ten years. They met their quota last year. WO-S marches on. 

Point number one is insignificant because, well, look at last year. But you are right, it’s more important than common opponents. The only common opponent I would judge off of is HF because it’s so recent. Wos killed them while silsbee barely won, and honestly could have easily lost that game if HF didn’t try kicking a field goal instead of going to OT.. BUT, the same thing happened last year and of course silsbee went on to beat wos in playoffs.

Your second point is the most important in my opinion. But it can be looked at a couple of ways: will Silsbee qb have THAT bad of a game again? Probably not, but I do think the chain gang defense makes him struggle a little bit again. Silsbee offense seems to be clicking, could it be because of the quality of opponents? I guess we will find out Friday. This is where the game will be won imo. Silsbee offense vs wos defense. My guess is that wos has the horses in the secondary to play man coverage and sell out to stopping the run, and put pressure on the qb. Silsbee will have to beat them passing the ball, or at least that’s what I think wos gamelan will be going in.

On a side note, just like I believe Foster won’t play as bad this time around, I also don’t believe wos offense will have as bad a game as they did last year in round 4. Several turnovers and couldn’t move the ball to save their lives. 

My prediction is I think wos can hold silsbee to under 17 points, and I think that will be enough to give them the win. I wouldn’t mind being wrong though!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Coach Foster and I had talked earlier in the season and he told me this might be his last year to coach but still wasn't sure. Well, he is sure now. It's been a great privilege to cover his teams. I always enjoy watching his teams play. They are always one of the best coached teams year in and year out. But it's more of an honor and privilege to call Kevin my friend. He is just an absolute great man. He and his dad are the reasons I am a big Big Sandy fan. I will miss Coach on the sidelines. Just won't be the same without him. But I also know we will keep in touch and he will be greeting me when I attend Wildcat basketball games. Congrats Coach Foster!!! Job well done my friend!
    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...