Jump to content

Trump is not a king


Big girl

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, Big girl said:

Biden was acting on behalf of the US. European countries agreed with him. What is so hard to understand about that. Trump was acting on behalf of himself. He was trying to dig up dirt.on a political rival. 

Again, he was acting on behalf of his son.  He was trying to get the prosecutor fired that was investigating the corrupt company, of which his son was on the board.  I know that hard for you to wrap your head around.  But when Biden makes clear, with his own words, that aid will be withheld if he is not fired, then why is that not a problem in your eyes?  Also, he makes it clear that obama is in agreeance with this quid pro quo.  Not really that hard to understand,  but..........!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BS Wildcats said:

Again, he was acting on behalf of his son.  He was trying to get the prosecutor fired that was investigating the corrupt company, of which his son was on the board.  I know that hard for you to wrap your head around.  But when Biden makes clear, with his own words, that aid will be withheld if he is not fired, then why is that not a problem in your eyes?  Also, he makes it clear that obama is in agreeance with this quid pro quo.  Not really that hard to understand,  but..........!

 

 

Even if all that was true, if anyone was or is concerned, the proper channel for investigation is the Justice Department, not the president’s personal attorney and a the ambassador to the EU, whose jurisdiction does not include Ukraine. The president’s attorney worked to get that post vacated so Sondland could step into the void. If that ain’t corrupt, we might as well have no laws.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, UT alum said:

Even if all that was true, if anyone was or is concerned, the proper channel for investigation is the Justice Department, not the president’s personal attorney and a the ambassador to the EU, whose jurisdiction does not include Ukraine. The president’s attorney worked to get that post vacated so Sondland could step into the void. If that ain’t corrupt, we might as well have no laws.

 

If true?  It came straight out of Biden's mouth.  Since it was a Dimocrat, you, as well as Big girl, will turn a blind eye.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BS Wildcats said:

If true?  It came straight out of Biden's mouth.  Since it was a Dimocrat, you, as well as Big girl, will turn a blind eye.

 

Call an apple an orange. That’s how the right argues. Obfuscate and confuse. Putin wold be proud of you. You’re helping fulfill the Soviet mission.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, UT alum said:

Call an apple an orange. That’s how the right argues. Obfuscate and confuse. Putin wold be proud of you. You’re helping fulfill the Soviet mission.

It's funny you say that, seems to me that's all you try to do on this board. Putin is proud of you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/4/2019 at 10:18 AM, UT alum said:

Even if all that was true, if anyone was or is concerned, the proper channel for investigation is the Justice Department, not the president’s personal attorney and a the ambassador to the EU, whose jurisdiction does not include Ukraine. The president’s attorney worked to get that post vacated so Sondland could step into the void. If that ain’t corrupt, we might as well have no laws.

 

What Biden did was made public years ago. Why is Trump so concerned now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Big girl said:

What Biden did was made public years ago. Why is Trump so concerned now?

Why does the left get concerned with what Trump did years ago?  You just turn a blind eye when the Dims are out of line.  Just keep telling yourself Crazy Joe was working on behalf of the U.S., you may get someone other than yourself to believe that 💩.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/4/2019 at 1:17 PM, UT alum said:

Call an apple an orange. That’s how the right argues. Obfuscate and confuse. Putin wold be proud of you. You’re helping fulfill the Soviet mission.

The Soviet “mission” is being fulfilled by the Democrats and their blind followers. 
 

Two quotes by Lenin:

“Give me just one generation of youth, and I'll transform the whole world.” - Lenin

“Give me two generations of children of Americans in school without God and I will take the nation without firing a shot!” - Lenin
 

Sound familiar?

 If you are willing to let these two things happen, then why the concern of the Soviet’s “mission” ? Again, you make no sense and are two-faced.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,885
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    bongomu
    Newest Member
    bongomu
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Really good hire! As I stated previously on this thread, Mike T has been an essential part of WB’s success the last few years & is a student of the game & I have a ton of respect for how he goes about things as a coach. Big on teaching kids how to do things the right way to prepare them for not only basketball but the game of life. He’ll be fine there, my only question is what kind of talent does WB have returning?  Best thing about this situation for Mike T is WB will be 5A for at least the next 2 years, so he should win a lot of games & have some deep playoff runs.
    • So which coaches kid gets the QB job? Trotter or Barrier
    • A Winnie land owner (and others) sued the State of Texas after they built IH-10 a few feet higher in order to help contain storm flooding. Sure enough a hurricane hit and flooded the land. The storm improvements worked!! Unfortunately the state sacrificed several people’s properties in using the interstate highway as a dam.  Richard DeVillier tried to sue Texas under our laws and Constitution and the US Constitution under the Fifth Amendment “taking clause” (eminent domain). After a favorable ruling in the federal district court on the right to sue Texas directly, the Fifth Circuit Court in New Orleans overturned that ruling and said that the DeVlier had no authority to sue Texas directly.  On Tuesday a unanimous US Supreme Court ruled that DeVillier and others had the right to sue Texas directly under Texas law and under the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution. The case is now sent back down to the lower court. DeVillier and others have not won their lawsuits as the case has not been decided on its merits at a trial. He still has to go to prove his case. What they did win was a unanimous Supreme Court agreeing that he has the right to bring Texas to trial for taking his property with just compensation.   
    • Don't jump?!  What?!
    • @Big girl  @UT alum     Amazing, isn't it?!  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...