Jump to content

Trump is not a king


Big girl

Recommended Posts

That has to be one of the stupidest articles I have read. CNN and their Trump hatred stinks all through it. What a sheltered life people lead who would believe one shred of that biased crapola.

Please list any president who has revealed their tax return. Next, list all the presidents whose birth certificate was questionable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, baddog said:

That has to be one of the stupidest articles I have read. CNN and their Trump hatred stinks all through it. What a sheltered life people lead who would believe one shred of that biased crapola.

Please list any president who has revealed their tax return. Next, list all the presidents whose birth certificate was questionable. 

Carter, Reagan, Bush l, Clinton, Bush ll, Obama. Obama’s birth certificate was questioned only by those seeking to delegitimize his presidency, his successor being chief among them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, UT alum said:

Thank you for your bravery in posting that in here. Kings have always despised courts and judges they could not control.

I guess we will have a sham hearing to figure out if Trump said he was a king.  As with the other hearing, there will be no evidence found.  Keep trying dims, keep trying!!

TRUMP 2020!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, UT alum said:

Carter, Reagan, Bush l, Clinton, Bush ll, Obama. Obama’s birth certificate was questioned only by those seeking to delegitimize his presidency, his successor being chief among them.

I should have asked who had been “forced” to reveal their tax return. It is not a requirement, just like yours and mine

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, baddog said:

I should have asked who had been “forced” to reveal their tax return. It is not a requirement, just like yours and mine

No one has had to be forced. They volunteered. It’s called transparency. As for requirements, check Section 6103 (f) (1) and (2) of the tax code.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Transparency is only required of the right.   And, remember, that Mr. Obama assured us all that his was the most transparent administration in history.  ( That ranks right up there with "shovel ready jobs" and "the Benghazi attack was caused by an internet video", and " Bowe Bergdahl served his country with honor and distinction")

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, UT alum said:

No one has had to be forced. They volunteered. It’s called transparency. As for requirements, check Section 6103 (f) (1) and (2) of the tax code.

What would Trump showing his tax return do that the IRS hasn’t already done? I mean really. You’d just go to another topic. Dead end here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not as if the Dems dont already know everything they need to know about Trumps tax returns.  Can you say Lois Lerner?  It's not different than the " Muller Investigation" and the "quid pro quo" debacles.  They knew there was nothing to either one of them( just like Supreme Court battle) but they also counted on fomenting a lot more hate and resentment with the  hope of something turning up during all of the "investigations".  The current "investigation" is a total sham.  NOBODY has any direct evidence of quid pro quo ( or Bribery as the polls suggested was better understood).  All statements have been nothing more than conclusions, many of which were third and fourth hand.  My favorite part is most of the witnesses were asked "how they felt about various circumstances"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, stevenash said:

It's not as if the Dems dont already know everything they need to know about Trumps tax returns.  Can you say Lois Lerner?  It's not different than the " Muller Investigation" and the "quid pro quo" debacles.  They knew there was nothing to either one of them( just like Supreme Court battle) but they also counted on fomenting a lot more hate and resentment with the  hope of something turning up during all of the "investigations".  The current "investigation" is a total sham.  NOBODY has any direct evidence of quid pro quo ( or Bribery as the polls suggested was better understood).  All statements have been nothing more than conclusions, many of which were third and fourth hand.  My favorite part is most of the witnesses were asked "how they felt about various circumstances"

The hypocrisy of the right is astounding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,935
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • Actually I wasn’t responding to your comment. It was funny. I was using your comment to take issue with baddog’s comparison. 😎
    • I mean the baseball kids aren’t even doing football after school, they go to baseball… baseball kids get about a hour during the period. 
    • That is yet to be determined in trial. ”Taking” in the Fifth Amendment doesn’t mean ownership, title changing hands, etc. A government can “take” your property without “taking” your properties.  That has been true.  This issue is, did Texas take the property under the Fifth Amendment and subsequent Supreme Court rulings and not the dictionary definition of “taking”. As always in the law, definitions matter. 
    • Wrong again. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   The day that Trump took office, our nation debt stood at 19.9 Trillion dollars (End of Q4, 2016).  After his tax cuts (without corresponding cuts in spending), the national debt stood at 23.2 Trillion dollars at the end of Q1 of 2020 that was the Start of COVID, FYI... Or a total increase in debt of almost 17% during Trump's first three years (and one quarter) in office.  At the end of his reign (with COVID spending for which Trump himself signed off on) was at 27.7 Trillion Dollars.  That's a 39% increase in the National Debt while Trump was in office.  For further reference, Biden inherited a 27.7 Trillion dollar debt to start.  At the end of Q4 2023, the debt stands at 34 Trillion.  That's an increase of 19% over the first three years. I know that math and facts hurt your feelings, but Trump was horrible for the country before he allowed "them Dirty Democrats to shut down the economy."  Anybody that says "Trump was good for the country" doesn't know the first thing about micro/macro economics or the effects of deficit spending.  Trump hurt us like no other president, period.  Anybody that says "Trump was good for the economy" is actually stating for the rest of us with some sense "I don't know what I'm talking about."
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...