Jump to content

Texas at Iowa St.

UTfanatic

By UTfanatic
in College Sports Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

TXHORN_ET

TXHORN_ET

Posted
Posted

Well ol gum chewing water drinking Herman will once again how hard it is to win a college fb game, especially on the road. He turned down an opportunity to have dicker try a fg early in the first half. Plus need 1 first down to win in the end and can’t get it. You don’t win many contests only showing up in 1 quarter. This one’s on Herman and his staff. They are beating themselves. I need some Tylenol!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AggiesAreWe

AggiesAreWe

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, TXHORN_ET said:

Well ol gum chewing water drinking Herman will once again how hard it is to win a college fb game, especially on the road. He turned down an opportunity to have dicker try a fg early in the first half. Plus need 1 first down to win in the end and can’t get it. You don’t win many contests only showing up in 1 quarter. This one’s on Herman and his staff. They are beating themselves. I need some Tylenol!!!

Maybe tequila.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Buddy Garrity

Mr. Buddy Garrity

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, TXHORN_ET said:

Well ol gum chewing water drinking Herman will once again how hard it is to win a college fb game, especially on the road. He turned down an opportunity to have dicker try a fg early in the first half. Plus need 1 first down to win in the end and can’t get it. You don’t win many contests only showing up in 1 quarter. This one’s on Herman and his staff. They are beating themselves. I need some Tylenol!!!

Always remember: you could be Arkansas. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
baddog

baddog

Posted
Posted

Texas played bad and still could have won this. Iowa State could whip a lot of the hater’s teams, except for team first. They lost a lot of very close games and finally won one. Like TXhorn said, just get the first down at the end and get the W. Let’s see how well the gloating igs do against SC

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PhatMack19

PhatMack19

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, baddog said:

Texas played bad and still could have won this. Iowa State could whip a lot of the hater’s teams, except for team first. They lost a lot of very close games and finally won one. Like TXhorn said, just get the first down at the end and get the W. Let’s see how well the gloating igs do against SC

I agree.  Time to give Herman an extension!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AggiesAreWe

AggiesAreWe

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, baddog said:

Texas played bad and still could have won this. Iowa State could whip a lot of the hater’s teams, except for team first. They lost a lot of very close games and finally won one. Like TXhorn said, just get the first down at the end and get the W. Let’s see how well the gloating igs do against SC

Up 23-3 in 4th

Link to comment
Share on other sites
baddog

baddog

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, PhatMack19 said:

I agree.  Time to give Herman an extension!

Igs played well against 4-6, now 4-7 SC. Cant believe they won 4. Still, an SEC victory counts for more than outside conference games.

Not sure if Herman is to blame 100%. The coordinators actually control the game. Herman is responsible for having his team prepared and fired up. We looked flat all day. I blame that on him. Another ho-hum season but we will go bowling. Nothing to really brag about that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AggiesAreWe

AggiesAreWe

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, baddog said:

Igs played well against 4-6, now 4-7 SC. Cant believe they won 4. Still, an SEC victory counts for more than outside conference games.

Not sure if Herman is to blame 100%. The coordinators actually control the game. Herman is responsible for having his team prepared and fired up. We looked flat all day. I blame that on him. Another ho-hum season but we will go bowling. Nothing to really brag about that.

One of those 4 wins is against #4 Georgia

Link to comment
Share on other sites
baddog

baddog

Posted
Posted
30 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

App St. is 9-1 and ranked #22 in nation.

Even the weaker conferences get ranked sometimes.

So with your reasoning, the Igs can beat Georgia. That’s like me saying Texas is as good as Bama because we played lsu to almost identical scores. I think we both know better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AggiesAreWe

AggiesAreWe

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, baddog said:

Even the weaker conferences get ranked sometimes.

So with your reasoning, the Igs can beat Georgia. That’s like me saying Texas is as good as Bama because we played lsu to almost identical scores. I think we both know better.

I'm not making any reason. I am just debunking your statements. You were desperately trying to down play the Aggie win over SC by stating the Gamecocks only won 4 games (couldn't believe they had won 4) without mentioning they beat Georgia and then make a comment that they lost to App St like it was a really bad loss. App St is good no matter what conference they are in.

South Carolina is not a good team. But they are not as bad as you are trying to make them out to be so that it helps your narrative.

It's so funny. You do exactly the same thing to Aggies what you despise what folks do to your horns.

All you really needed to say was SC isn't that good after your hope of A&M losing to them was gone. I mean, most folks already knew this since the Aggies were favored by 11.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
baddog

baddog

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

I'm not making any reason. I am just debunking your statements. You were desperately trying to down play the Aggie win over SC by stating the Gamecocks only won 4 games (couldn't believe they had won 4) without mentioning they beat Georgia and then make a comment that they lost to App St like it was a really bad loss. App St is good no matter what conference they are in.

South Carolina is not a good team. But they are not as bad as you are trying to make them out to be so that it helps your narrative.

It's so funny. You do exactly the same thing to Aggies what you despise what folks do to your horns.

All you really needed to say was SC isn't that good after your hope of A&M losing to them was gone. I mean, most folks already knew this since the Aggies were favored by 11.

Yeah, like the “they’re back” comment and the fact that igs are always on the Texas thread, especially if we lose. Funny how a non conference team gets so much attention from igs. I knew SC wasn’t good, but you continue with your condescension as if I wasn’t aware. You act as though my ig comment of “ let’s see how they do” was terrible of me, when that’s what you hope for weekly for my Horns. How anyone can despise a University as much as igs do Texas is totally unbelievable to me. I can’t shoulder that much hate in my life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AggiesAreWe

AggiesAreWe

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, baddog said:

Yeah, like the “they’re back” comment and the fact that igs are always on the Texas thread, especially if we lose. Funny how a non conference team gets so much attention from igs. I knew SC wasn’t good, but you continue with your condescension as if I wasn’t aware. You act as though my ig comment of “ let’s see how they do” was terrible of me, when that’s what you hope for weekly for my Horns. How anyone can despise a University as much as igs do Texas is totally unbelievable to me. I can’t shoulder that much hate in my life.

You are showing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,932
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Newest Member
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Joined


  • Posts

    • tvc184
      It’s kinda weird…

      By tvc184 · Posted

      Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • Englebert
      It’s kinda weird…

      By Englebert · Posted

      You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a dirtbag does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...Dirtbags. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comment were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • UT alum
      It’s kinda weird…

      By UT alum · Posted

      Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • UT alum
      It’s kinda weird…

      By UT alum · Posted

      Election interference. Cheating.
    • UT alum
      It’s kinda weird…

      By UT alum · Posted

      It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...