Jump to content

86 Teams make UIL Football Playoffs with losing Records


BADSANTA

Recommended Posts

There are some states that all teams make the playoffs. Regular season games are just for seeding. Yes I know they are nowhere near the size of the great state of Texas. Yes I agree it is watered down. Lets see how many 3 and 4 seeds advance. I'm sure that there are a few very strong districts that have worthy 3 and 4 seeds. I never see the UIL going back to fewer playoff teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, JasperDAWG said:

Well it's happened. 1980 Jasper tied Beaumont Hebert 10-10 In district game. With that being the old "penetrations" days the DAWGS stayed home while Hebert went to playoffs.

I remember that year.  Jasper tied Huntsville in the opening game that season.  Huntsville beat Hebert 16-8 in the  first round on their way to winning State. Those winner take all years left a lot of good teams at home.  Some good Navasota teams stayed home too.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Makemineaconvertible said:

Not about shirts and trophies it’s about money. They will expand the field before it decreases 

 

19 minutes ago, MrUmp1 said:

There are some states that all teams make the playoffs. Regular season games are just for seeding. Yes I know they are nowhere near the size of the great state of Texas. Yes I agree it is watered down. Lets see how many 3 and 4 seeds advance. I'm sure that there are a few very strong districts that have worthy 3 and 4 seeds. I never see the UIL going back to fewer playoff teams.

Oh I was joking.  While it may seem overly watered down (maybe it is).. every year either a 3 or 4 beats a 1 or 2.  That in itself justifies taking 4 teams.  Some districts are strong and some are trash.  In the end.. it only takes two or three rounds to truly weed out the ones that don’t belong.

As for teams in the playoffs with losing records.. you can’t punish them all to spite a few.  Some teams have losing preseason records because they jumped on some giants before district.   Some playoff teams only have winning records because they played cupcakes before district.  You can’t base a playoff team on overall record.. otherwise nobody would play anyone that’s any good.

Like I said.. it works itself out.  The cream always rises to the top.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MrUmp1 said:

There are some states that all teams make the playoffs. Regular season games are just for seeding. Yes I know they are nowhere near the size of the great state of Texas. Yes I agree it is watered down. Lets see how many 3 and 4 seeds advance. I'm sure that there are a few very strong districts that have worthy 3 and 4 seeds. I never see the UIL going back to fewer playoff teams.

Again, I am ok with 4 teams qualifying as long as each district has a minimum of 7 teams. That way, a team would have to win 2 district games to make the playoffs. If a team went 2-8 but those two wins were in district in a 7 team district, that is fine. They earned their way to the playoffs.

How in the heck does a team that goes 0-10 earn it's playoff spot? Geography

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NHSBulldogFan said:

If 4 seeds didn't belong no one could ever explain how Decatur ended up in the state semi-finals last year. I'm for 4 teams in the playoffs but the UIL needs to find someway to eliminate the 4 and 5 team districts.

I would even be okay with 6 team districts. The 4 and 5 team districts need to be done with if you are going to stay a 4 team playoff system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

I would even be okay with 6 team districts. The 4 and 5 team districts need to be done with if you are going to stay a 4 team playoff system.

I agree, they got to find a way to make 6 team districts work on the lower levels especially. The beatdowns some of the 4 seeds take in 4a down would be reduced. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You really wanna complain about the UIL wanting to make more money? Isn't that how capitalism works? Who cares about the UIL wanting to make more money. Next time you get a raise, find a better paying job, or come up with a genius money making idea, don't take advantage of it. You're just doing it for the money. People ALWAYS find a reason to complain about something. Let's focus on the positives. It's awesome for the kids to experience a playoff atmosphere. If I am a senior of 4 seed starting down the barrel of a 1 seed who will likely win the state championship, I'll take that whooping rather than hanging up the pads and moving on to off-season. Losing record or not. It is something those kids will take with them forever. The UIL may have it's motives, but I assure you opinions from grown dudes, who quite frankly, don't know anything about high school sports, don't really hold a candle to the experience these kids get to take part in. BTW 4 seeds have taken out 1 seeds before and it will happen again. Stop complaining and start getting excited. IT'S PLAYOFF TIME BABY!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Guitar Man said:

You really wanna complain about the UIL wanting to make more money? Isn't that how capitalism works? Who cares about the UIL wanting to make more money. Next time you get a raise, find a better paying job, or come up with a genius money making idea, don't take advantage of it. You're just doing it for the money. People ALWAYS find a reason to complain about something. Let's focus on the positives. It's awesome for the kids to experience a playoff atmosphere. If I am a senior of 4 seed starting down the barrel of a 1 seed who will likely win the state championship, I'll take that whooping rather than hanging up the pads and moving on to off-season. Losing record or not. It is something those kids will take with them forever. The UIL may have it's motives, but I assure you opinions from grown dudes, who quite frankly, don't know anything about high school sports, don't really hold a candle to the experience these kids get to take part in. BTW 4 seeds have taken out 1 seeds before and it will happen again. Stop complaining and start getting excited. IT'S PLAYOFF TIME BABY!!

I take it that you do know about high school sports?

Speaking for myself, I know plenty about high school sports. It's my job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NHSBulldogFan said:

If 4 seeds didn't belong no one could ever explain how Decatur ended up in the state semi-finals last year. I'm for 4 teams in the playoffs but the UIL needs to find someway to eliminate the 4 and 5 team districts.

Decatur made the semifinals last year because they play in Region 1. And they realistically only had to beat their own district champion (WF Hirschi) to get there, whom they already beat in district. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Guitar Man said:

You really wanna complain about the UIL wanting to make more money? Isn't that how capitalism works? Who cares about the UIL wanting to make more money. Next time you get a raise, find a better paying job, or come up with a genius money making idea, don't take advantage of it. You're just doing it for the money. People ALWAYS find a reason to complain about something. Let's focus on the positives. It's awesome for the kids to experience a playoff atmosphere. If I am a senior of 4 seed starting down the barrel of a 1 seed who will likely win the state championship, I'll take that whooping rather than hanging up the pads and moving on to off-season. Losing record or not. It is something those kids will take with them forever. The UIL may have it's motives, but I assure you opinions from grown dudes, who quite frankly, don't know anything about high school sports, don't really hold a candle to the experience these kids get to take part in. BTW 4 seeds have taken out 1 seeds before and it will happen again. Stop complaining and start getting excited. IT'S PLAYOFF TIME BABY!!

By your argument, where do you draw the line then? Why not have 6 teams, or 8. Or we could just say everyone makes the playoffs. That would make the UIL even more money.

The reason we “get excited” for playoff times as you stated in your last sentence is because it’s a special time where the teams who earned it get to keep playing. The more you let in, the less special it becomes, the less exciting it gets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, yepyep said:

Decatur made the semifinals last year because they play in Region 1. And they realistically only had to beat their own district champion (WF Hirschi) to get there, whom they already beat in district. 

4A Division 1 is bad in region 1 I'll say that but even still finishing 4th and making it that far is still a heck of an accomplishment

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Guitar Man said:

You really wanna complain about the UIL wanting to make more money? Isn't that how capitalism works? Who cares about the UIL wanting to make more money. Next time you get a raise, find a better paying job, or come up with a genius money making idea, don't take advantage of it. You're just doing it for the money. People ALWAYS find a reason to complain about something. Let's focus on the positives. It's awesome for the kids to experience a playoff atmosphere. If I am a senior of 4 seed starting down the barrel of a 1 seed who will likely win the state championship, I'll take that whooping rather than hanging up the pads and moving on to off-season. Losing record or not. It is something those kids will take with them forever. The UIL may have it's motives, but I assure you opinions from grown dudes, who quite frankly, don't know anything about high school sports, don't really hold a candle to the experience these kids get to take part in. BTW 4 seeds have taken out 1 seeds before and it will happen again. Stop complaining and start getting excited. IT'S PLAYOFF TIME BABY!!

Well then the UIL is missing it's chance.  If it's only about money they should let every team in and do a double elimination tournament.  Heck.. let's play two games a week.  Or three.  Who cares about what's good for students and schools let's just make it happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Guitar Man said:

I think the 4 team system works and should be the cap. Yeah, some teams have losing records and some get blown out in round 1. In the end, though, It gives teams in a tough district a chance to make a dent while in other systems, they wouldn't have a chance. 

It only works if all districts have 7 or more teams. It doesn't work when districts only have 4 or 5 teams. In essence, a team in a 4 team district could forfeit every game in the regular season and still qualify for playoffs. That sir is not a playoff system that works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

It only works if all districts have 7 or more teams. It doesn't work when districts only have 4 or 5 teams. In essence, a team in a 4 team district could forfeit every game in the regular season and still qualify for playoffs. That sir is not a playoff system that works.

This^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And if the UIL cannot figure out a way to eliminate the 4-5 team districts, then I say go back to 3 teams qualifying and reward the district champ a first round bye. At least that way a district championship means something.

Speaking of district champs, in this current system, I think district champs in all classifications (not just 6A and 5A) should host the first round game. Reward the teams for that accomplishment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

It only works if all districts have 7 or more teams. It doesn't work when districts only have 4 or 5 teams. In essence, a team in a 4 team district could forfeit every game in the regular season and still qualify for playoffs. That sir is not a playoff system that works.

Teams in each division.

6A 252
5ad1 127
5ad2 125
4ad1 92
4ad2 90
3ad1 106
3ad2 105
2ad1 94
2ad2 87

1078 schools ÷ 9 divisions = almost 120. Not 87, or 252

Then 120 schools ÷ 16 districts = 7 or 8. Not 4, and all 4 make the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,937
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • he'll 1000% abuse this if elected and given the chance.  he's like a petulant little kid.  again, I'm voting for his policy, but he's all about revenge against slights and wrongs, both real and perceived.  
    • 3 yrs ago LCM and Vidor played in Vidor for a play in game.  Game was on a Saturday and started around 1 or 2p.
    • It would shock me beyond belief if he tried to. Now, I hope and pray he appoints people that will investigate, charge, and imprison anyone found guilty of the crimes against him...including treason. I would be all for a special task force charged solely with the task of investigating crimes against Trump. Of course the Democrats will be screaming bloody murder that Trump is weaponizing the government against them. We all know the story. From a cursory standpoint, there seems to be a plethora of evidence to lock up many Democrats for a long time. Unless this is done, I see no end to destruction of our political system...and this country.
    • There is a difference, but I wouldn't at all put it past Trump to do so if he had the infrastructure in place to get away with it like the Dems currently do.  With the amount of effort he's invested in ruining those republicans who've opposed him, it wouldn't surprise me one bit.
    • I think it will be an interesting case and could potentially come up for appeal on a different constitutional point.  The Supreme Court has ruled in the past that the government doesn’t have to take possession of property in order to take it under the meaning of the Fifth Amendment.  If they take away the enjoyment or use of the property, it is no different than physically seizing it to build a highway for example. In a lawsuit as opposed to a criminal trial, a person/plaintiff doesn’t have to prove something beyond a reasonable doubt but rather by a preponderance of evidence or “more likely” to have happened. Maybe it could be described as more likely yes than no or 51%-49%.  ”IF” it can be shown at a trial by a preponderance of evidence that Texas more likely yes than no caused the flooding with its engineering of the project, the people suing might have a case. But…. Does that alone win the case under the Fifth Amendment taking clause? I am not so sure. In US v Causby the Supreme Court ruled that the US government took a man’s property by flying airplanes over it. It was a public airport lawfully leased by the US in WWII and used to fly heavy bombers from it. Causby had an egg farm and the extremely loud noise of some airplanes under full power and sometimes at night with a landing lights being so close, it bothered and scared the family and damaged his egg farm production. Some chickens died and some quit laying eggs due to the extreme disturbances and lights at night. The Supreme Court ruled in Causby’s favor saying that the US had taken away the enjoyment and use of his land even though they didn’t physically seize it. The use of the land was hampered and that was enough for the taking clause under the Fifth Amendment. So in the IH-10 case, did Texas take away the use or enjoyment of the property?  A point of Causby was that the military bombers at a public airport was certainly for “public use”. The planes were public/taxpayers’ and the airport and lease were taxpayers’ property so the “public” definitely used it   My question in this lawsuit against Texas, even in they can prove the damage, was the damage (like in Causby) for “public use”? If not would it then not be a Fifth Amendment case but rather a state law case?  If Texas law denies such a lawsuit under state sovereignty and the families can’t prove a Fifth Amendment case of “public use”, could they prove the damages but still lose the case under state law? I haven’t read that anywhere and just thinking out loud. I could be way off base. But I think it could be interesting…..
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...