Jump to content

Democrats Embrace the Godless


Hagar

Recommended Posts

On 11/9/2019 at 3:36 PM, BS Wildcats said:

There is one occasional poster here that will be butt hurt because the Democrats are called Godless.  But, if you condone the killing of innocent babies, you are Godless in my book.  If the shoe fits, wear it.

No less Godless than one who separates babies from parents and keeps them in cages. How long you wanna keep calling names?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, UT alum said:

No less Godless than one who separates babies from parents and keeps them in cages. How long you wanna keep calling names?

Obama did it. You said nothing....... typical.
 

People in glass houses...... How about separating (pieces at a time) unborn babies from their mothers? Like BS said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, UT alum said:

No less Godless than one who separates babies from parents and keeps them in cages. How long you wanna keep calling names?

This is such a lame argument. If you drive down the road with your kids in the car and you get stopped by the police, if you have warrants and are taken to jail, guess what, you get separated from your kids. No cop on earth is going to throw kids in a jail cell with their parents. Same as with the detention centers at the border. Crossing illegally is a CRIME and you will be detained and separated from your kids. That is the law, not something unique to Trump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, baddog said:

This is such a lame argument. If you drive down the road with your kids in the car and you get stopped by the police, if you have warrants and are taken to jail, guess what, you get separated from your kids. No cop on earth is going to throw kids in a jail cell with their parents. Same as with the detention centers at the border. Crossing illegally is a CRIME and you will be detained and separated from your kids. That is the law, not something unique to Trump.

And the law was in place prior to Trump being elected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:

This is the hidden content, please

Everyone but you already knew this apparently.

Did you read all of that Snopes post? Hardly an endorsement of Orange Hair’s policy. Can you point to examples of President Obama’s policies having no procedure, or making no attempt at reuniting the families? President Orangutan’s policy was, in effect, “screw ‘em”.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, stevenash said:

And the law was in place prior to Trump being elected.

That may be true, but due process and procedures to reunite the family, or separate, depending on the underlying criminal charge exist for citizens. False equivalence, as usual, to try and draw a logical conclusion. That dog don’t hunt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, UT alum said:

Did you read all of that Snopes post? Hardly an endorsement of Orange Hair’s policy. Can you point to examples of President Obama’s policies having no procedure, or making no attempt at reuniting the families? President Orangutan’s policy was, in effect, “screw ‘em”.

I did read it...did you?

What would you do with children of those that are incarcerated for illegally crossing the border.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, UT alum said:

That may be true, but due process and procedures to reunite the family, or separate, depending on the underlying criminal charge exist for citizens. False equivalence, as usual, to try and draw a logical conclusion. That dog don’t hunt.

go ahead and show me how due process existed only during the Obama years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BS Wildcats said:

You don't condemn murder, so you condone it?   Right to choose is still murder if you choose that route.

Murder is against the law, so it’s not murder. Your decision to call it that doesn’t change the fact. 

 

6 hours ago, stevenash said:

go ahead and show me how due process existed only during the Obama years.

“What about Obama?” There you go again. “What about” is all you can argue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, UT alum said:

Murder is against the law, so it’s not murder. Your decision to call it that doesn’t change the fact. 

 

“What about Obama?” There you go again. “What about” is all you can argue.

So, when I ask you to substantiate your allegation, your only retort is Whatism, false equivalent, yada yada yada.  If you are going to make a claim, back it up once instead of offering empty, banal rhetoric.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, stevenash said:

So, when I ask you to substantiate your allegation, your only retort is Whatism, false equivalent, yada yada yada.  If you are going to make a claim, back it up once instead of offering empty, banal rhetoric.

Besides all that, grand jury investigation is part of due process. Trump hasn’t been denied it. Defendants aren’t allowed in a grand jury investigation. He’ll get the chance to present his evidence and cross examine his accusers when and if it goes to trial.  Howling about due process jus sounds like someone who’s innocence is suspect. When you don’t have that facts on your side, attack the process. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, UT alum said:

You’re going to argue on principles? Your leader is the most unprincipled man to ever hold the office, hands down.

Great comment.  Show me the facts on the unprincipled office holder.

Let's not forget Bill Clinton,  Obbamy, Nixon oh!!! how about JFK??

If you are a working man/women or business owner - ANYTHING OTHER  than a Personal Injury lawlesser why would you not favor Trump - interest rates low, jobs up, market record gains, trying to keep the illegals out

Specifically, what has he done bad and  unprincipled????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, UT alum said:

Back at ya

Sorry, back at you wont work.  If you are going to lob the allegations, you need to substantiate them.  Its easy for me to call you a child molester but nobody cares unless I can offer something more than the allegation.

 

22 minutes ago, UT alum said:

Besides all that, grand jury investigation is part of due process. Trump hasn’t been denied it. Defendants aren’t allowed in a grand jury investigation. He’ll get the chance to present his evidence and cross examine his accusers when and if it goes to trial.  Howling about due process jus sounds like someone who’s innocence is suspect. When you don’t have that facts on your side, attack the process. 

And when you have no facts, attack whom you dont like

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,322
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Kourt1
    Newest Member
    Kourt1
    Joined

×
×
  • Create New...