This is the hidden content, please
Sign In
or
Sign Up
A sitting SCJ that doesn't understand the Constitution, smh.
I feel like she's channeling Obama when he called the Constitution a "charter of negative liberties".
From the article:
As the justices questioned whether the Biden administration crossed the constitutional line, Jackson appeared to suggest that such actions can be justified.
"My biggest concern is that your view has the First Amendment hamstringing the federal government in significant ways in the most important time periods," she told the lawyer representing Louisiana, Missouri and private plaintiffs.
"And so I guess some might say that the government actually has a duty to take steps to protect the citizens of this country, and you seem to be suggesting that that duty cannot manifest itself in the government encouraging or even pressuring platforms to take down harmful information," she continued.
"So can you help me? Because I'm really – I'm really worried about that because you've got the First Amendment operating in an environment of threatening circumstances from the government's perspective, and you're saying that the government can't interact with the source of those problems," Jackson added.
Her comments quickly went viral with dozens of people insisting that "hamstringing the federal government" is "literally the point" of the First Amendment.
Foster should've gotten all-region considering what he did with the group he had 😆
In all seriousness though he does seem to make average players so much better than they oughta be
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.