Jump to content

When does the program become the new coaches?


AHUDDLESTON

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, MrUmp1 said:

I think you have to give a coach a full off season. Conditioning, strength, and if he can get the kids to come to voluntary summer workouts. Once you can get some improvements then more will follow and your program will grow.

I concur that time is needed, but that’s me speaking. Unfortunately, most don’t feel the same way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Buddy Garrity said:

Great point!

I'm sorry.. but this thread is a little ridiculous in my opinion.  Between upper classmen, transfers, injuries, alignments, and everything else that could possibly change the outcome of any one team's season.. how could anyone possibly determine when any particular coach has made the difference in a program.  Enough of a difference to get credit/fault for wins/losses.  Especially schools around here where most of the head coaches don't even get to see their first set of freshmen (or 7th graders in smaller districts) make it to graduation.  If a kid has only played under one AD/HFC then they have played in said person's program.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, AHUDDLESTON said:

Addendum: What if you publicly criticize the previous staff and then proceed to lose more games and scoring margin skyrockets.

Again.. far too many variables.  What if you graduate 14 starters and move into a higher classification?  Is it the new coach's fault?  Previous?  

Or is it the same thing that happens all across the state?.. Players come. Players go. CIRCUMSTANCES CHANGE that have absolutely zero to do with the coaching staff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, oldschool2 said:

Again.. far too many variables.  What if you graduate 14 starters and move into a higher classification?  Is it the new coach's fault?  Previous?  

Or is it the same thing that happens all across the state?.. Players come. Players go. CIRCUMSTANCES CHANGE that have absolutely zero to do with the coaching staff.

New coach gets hired and completely trashed the staff from LAST YEAR. Publicly on a interview Stating the coaches had kids in wrong positions, the weight room was a joke, the coaches were not doing their jobs etc.... The new staff is supposed to come in and instantly do better and be successful that year because there are a lot of athletes and big lineman. Same kids ( minus a couple ) the next year in the same district and doing worse. What about in this situation? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Whatintheworld said:

New coach gets hired and completely trashed the staff from LAST YEAR. Publicly on a interview Stating the coaches had kids in wrong positions, the weight room was a joke, the coaches were not doing their jobs etc.... The new staff is supposed to come in and instantly do better and be successful that year because there are a lot of athletes and big lineman. Same kids ( minus a couple ) the next year in the same district and doing worse. What about in this situation? 

First of all.. it's never the same district.  You're assuming that every other school in the district is in the same situation as well as far as returning players and/or transfers/move-ins.  But.. let's say it's relatively close.  Seems like there may have been some political games being played in order to hire some new blood.  Sometimes a new staff will bring fresh perspective and get some kids out that would've have otherwise... and sometimes the lesson is learned that the former staff actually wasn't all that bad.  Again, I'm speaking hypothetically.  9 out of 10 times (or more) a school isn't in the same situation as the year before except for maybe the names of the  schools on the schedule.  

The schedule, classification, and graduation have more to do with what we're talking about than most other variables.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every new coach shouldn’t be judged until the season after a FULL offseason. Great coaches will make a difference with out an offseason. There aren’t many great ones out there. Over half of ALL hires are done deals with brother in laws or ADs drinking buddies or coaches in THSCA politics which looks good to many Superintendents which means he’s a brown nosed and politicker. I’ve worked for 11 coaches in 33 years of football. 2 great, 1 average, 2 below average and 6 AWFUL SELFISH for $ only.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, coach bear said:

Every new coach shouldn’t be judged until the season after a FULL offseason. Great coaches will make a difference with out an offseason. There aren’t many great ones out there. Over half of ALL hires are done deals with brother in laws or ADs drinking buddies or coaches in THSCA politics which looks good to many Superintendents which means he’s a brown nosed and politicker. I’ve worked for 11 coaches in 33 years of football. 2 great, 1 average, 2 below average and 6 AWFUL SELFISH for $ only.

 

 

 

Agreed!    Also, you are right:  A lot of people get head coaching jobs for other reasons than  that they deserve it.   Like, for instance, Superintendents not wanting to be over shadowed by a winning HC.  Etc, Etc...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Reagan said:

Agreed!    Also, you are right:  A lot of people get head coaching jobs for other reasons than  that they deserve it.   Like, for instance, Superintendents not wanting to be over shadowed by a winning HC.  Etc, Etc...

Or a baseball program needing the spotlight, lol.  

We hired a recent state finalist HC to be an assistant with our baseball program.

Our football program could be described as a backyard tire fire. 

No offense intended, of course.  Have you seen the new turf on our diamond?

A GOOD coach will make difference in year one if talent is static and the kids/community buy in....  the improvement is more noticeable if the previous coaching was subpar.

It's also laughable when an outgoing coach wants to take credit for the new coach's success.... I've seen it happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/21/2019 at 1:17 PM, Hagar said:

Your response might be because you follow a tradition rich school.  Take a team like Huntington.  Heck, a Coach that could just get a winning record for several years, could be Mayor (King) of that town.  😂😂😂

He plus get fired for that quicker then losing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,926
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Newest Member
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Joined


  • Posts

    • That there’s not a single thread on the fact that the Republican nominee is on trial for paying off a porn star with whom he had an affair while the future First Lady was carrying said nominee’s child.    I remember back when the dirty, no-good Dems sacked Gary Hart over something similar. Same thing with John Edwards and later Anthony Weiner.    But y’all keep pretending God is on your side, lol. 
    • I hear what you’re saying, BUT… that hammers the hell out of poor people and the ones with multiple properties don’t eat any more than the poor ones. In fact, you’d basically just be taxing a lot of peoples’ EBT payments. The government  can’t get ahead by taxing what they’re already borrowing to give to people.    I think well off people should pay more… but the scale as it exists is broken.    For the sake of argument, my mom’s house in Groves is valued at $125k. 2/1/1 on a slab.  Her tax bill is $850/year. Without exemptions, her bill would be 3200. It’s right on JCAD’s website. The problem is this…. If someone tries to rent out an identical house, they’d expect to get, what… $1200/month? If you take into account that homeowners/windstorm/flood is a minimum of another $2k per year, you’d need $5k a year just to cover the taxes and insurance. That’s four months (1/3 of the year) just to cover those costs, not counting a potential mortgage payment. But then everybody cries about how expensive rents are… you can’t tax the hell out of non-homestead property to make up for gifts given to homeowners in the form of big tax cuts. It just doesn’t work.    Ten acres in Lumberton? I’ve got a buddy with 10 acres in Lumberton on HWY 69. Prime property… it’s his retirement plan. Sale it one day and cash in. The CAD decided that it no longer qualifies for a special use valuation (timber) and stripped his “exemption.” His 2023 tax bill jumped from $25 to $22,000…. It’s insane.  
    • I’m curious what happened… they aren’t even in full pads yet. 
    • They’re going to have win almost all remaining games and get finals of tournament to think about an at-large. When LU was in the WAC, Grand Canyon got an at-large after New Mexico St came out of nowhere to win conference tournament. Grand Canyon had a dang good resume that year. It can happen, but resume wise isn’t in their favor.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...