Jump to content

Silsbee Tigers basketball


Recommended Posts

On 10/14/2019 at 1:36 PM, Tigers94 said:

Looks like Silsbee is gonna take a few on the chin early on.

November 22 could be the first home loss in a very long time.

I've experienced a fair share of lean Silsbee basketball seasons.  Back in the day it seemed like winning it all was the impossible dream.  Now there is hope.

It happened twice. Silsbee won back to back state championships.   That means it can happen again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kountzer said:

I've experienced a fair share of lean Silsbee basketball seasons.  Back in the day it seemed like winning it all was the impossible dream.  Now there is hope.

It happened twice. Silsbee won back to back state championships.   That means it can happen again.

It certainly does and from what I was told by a person of knowledge there 8th grade team has the best shot combined with the Freshman class from this year to be more special than any of the other classes in BBall and Football 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 10/14/2019 at 1:36 PM, Tigers94 said:

Looks like Silsbee is gonna take a few on the chin early on.

November 22 could be the first home loss in a very long time.

Being that most of those games are going to be at home, I think we will be in every one of those games and may pull of an upset or 2.  I remember when Central came to Tigers Den a few years back and they were loaded and they took one on the chin.  Don't underestimate B. Bush and the Tigers.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 409ANALYST said:

Being that most of those games are going to be at home, I think we will be in every one of those games and may pull of an upset or 2.  I remember when Central came to Tigers Den a few years back and they were loaded and they took one on the chin.  Don't underestimate B. Bush and the Tigers.  

🙄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, 409ANALYST said:

Being that most of those games are going to be at home, I think we will be in every one of those games and may pull of an upset or 2.  I remember when Central came to Tigers Den a few years back and they were loaded and they took one on the chin.  Don't underestimate B. Bush and the Tigers.  

I think we might can take Nederland and West Brook.

Memorial and United are very likely a not gonna happen. Not unless Silsbee shoots a crazy high percentage from 3 point land.

It doesn't' matter though. We'll be able to mix it up with almost anybody soon after this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tigers94 said:

I think we might can take Nederland and West Brook.

Memorial and United are very likely a not gonna happen. Not unless Silsbee shoots a crazy high percentage from 3 point land.

It doesn't' matter though. We'll be able to mix it up with almost anybody soon after this year.

West Brook is a real mystery at this point.  They do lose a good PG and a 6'9" kid that was a 3 year starter,  but they do return a 6'7" kid than can rebound and play defense as well.  This alone  may cause Silsbee major issues, factored in with a legend coaching them...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...