Jump to content

Is Hampshire Fannett the "REAL DEAL" this year


BADSANTA

Recommended Posts

HF is impressive.  QB has just improved every year over the last 3 years I have seen him.  They have two rb's to compliment him that can gain good yards as well.  Not much of a threat through the air.  Defensively they are not bad, but they will have to win shootouts against the better teams in Region III to have a chance when the playoffs roll around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, BADSANTA said:

I dont see then beating Silsbee but it will be a good game. 

Look at what you're  saying.  Obviously,  this Silsbee  team at this point  is not as good as last year's.  Clearly, this year's H-F team is better than last year's.   And Silsbee beat that team by 1 point.   This year, unless Silsbee gets substantially  better, I can see them losing to H-F...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't say HF is the real deal.  They will get 3rd at best in their district. District losses will come to WOS and Silsbee. Now, if they go out and blow out Liberty and beat Silsbee to play for a district championship against WOS then they can be considered the real deal. Until then, can this notion that they are.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

Look at what you're  saying.  Obviously,  this Silsbee  team at this point  is not as good as last year's.  Clearly, this year's H-F team is better than last year's.   And Silsbee beat that team by 1 point.   This year, unless Silsbee gets substantially  better, I can see them losing to H-F...

Wasn't Silsbee 2-3 at this point with wins over Bridge City and Lumberton last year?

This year they are 2-2 with wins over Nederland and a better Lumberton team. I believe they would have beat BC had the game been played.

I think this year's offense is as good, defense getting better. It is reasonable for Silsbee to be as good as last years team at the time they play H-F. Personally, I thought last years Silsbee team didn't start peaking till the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

Wasn't Silsbee 2-3 at this point with wins over Bridge City and Lumberton last year?

This year they are 2-2 with wins over Nederland and a better Lumberton team. I believe they would have beat BC had the game been played.

I think this year's offense is as good, defense getting better. It is reasonable for Silsbee to be as good as last years team at the time they play H-F. Personally, I thought last years Silsbee team didn't start peaking till the playoffs.

I saw the switch get turned on in that first WO-S game.  They wasnt  peaking, but that was the when the buildup to peaking began.  

But really good points above though.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

Look at what you're  saying.  Obviously,  this Silsbee  team at this point  is not as good as last year's.  Clearly, this year's H-F team is better than last year's.   And Silsbee beat that team by 1 point.   This year, unless Silsbee gets substantially  better, I can see them losing to H-F...

Pretty much we said the same thing right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • Election interference. Cheating.
    • It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...