Sign in to follow this  
PhatMack19

Formal Impeachment Inquiry

Recommended Posts

1

Second whistleblower crawls out of the septic tank.  Unless I misread, both are “intelligent types”.  See a pattern?  Look at the list of Big Russian Collusion advocates - Brennan, Clapper, Comey, Strzok, Horowitz, and Page.  The Dems are trying to keep their identities secret.  Could it be Christine Blasey Ford and Michael Avenatti?  Stormy Daniels?

https://apnews.com/3276e989b619417991482acaa5366015

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Hagar said:

Second whistleblower crawls out of the septic tank.  Unless I misread, both are “intelligent types”.  See a pattern?  Look at the list of Big Russian Collusion advocates - Brennan, Clapper, Comey, Strzok, Horowitz, and Page.  The Dems are trying to keep their identities secret.  Could it be Christine Blasey Ford and Michael Avenatti?  Stormy Daniels?

https://apnews.com/3276e989b619417991482acaa5366015

Probably Hillarious Clintionista!   LOL!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sure there will be many more "whistleblowers" come available just as there were more "victims" of  Justice Kavanaugh as that debacle unfolded.  What I am very curious about is this- Since we have the transcript of the conversation, what information can the next 100 whistleblowers provide?  All they can give is their "interpretation" of what was said.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, stevenash said:

I am sure there will be many more "whistleblowers" come available just as there were more "victims" of  Justice Kavanaugh as that debacle unfolded.  What I am very curious about is this- Since we have the transcript of the conversation, what information can the next 100 whistleblowers provide?  All they can give is their "interpretation" of what was said.

So true. The biggest problem is the people who voted these dims into office can’t think past their noses. I wish I were wrong as rain on that. Hopefully they tire of dim politics.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, stevenash said:

I am sure there will be many more "whistleblowers" come available just as there were more "victims" of  Justice Kavanaugh as that debacle unfolded.  What I am very curious about is this- Since we have the transcript of the conversation, what information can the next 100 whistleblowers provide?  All they can give is their "interpretation" of what was said.

Ah contraire.  They’re claiming that the transcript is a redacted version.  There was another 20 minutes, to 14 hours, depending on which liar you listen to.  Which makes me curious, does Trump have a Standing Room Audiencce in the Oval Office every time he makes a phone call?   And both whistleblowers, to my knowledge, are intelligence agents.  If true, Trump would be prudent to remove every intelligence type, or agent, from the WH.  Those agencies are full of democratic operatives.  Everyone in all agencies should be given a lie detector test, and any failures be fired.  They are nothing more than democratic operatives continuing this Third World Coup.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Hagar said:

Ah contraire.  They’re claiming that the transcript is a redacted version.  There was another 20 minutes, to 14 hours, depending on which liar you listen to.  Which makes me curious, does Trump have a Standing Room Audiencce in the Oval Office every time he makes a phone call?   And both whistleblowers, to my knowledge, are intelligence agents.  If true, Trump would be prudent to remove every intelligence type, or agent, from the WH.  Those agencies are full of democratic operatives.  Everyone in all agencies should be given a lie detector test, and any failures be fired.  They are nothing more than democratic operatives continuing this Third World Coup.

The reason the difference in length between the transcript and the audio portion is because there was a translator involved.  That's why there is a difference!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The dim microscope that Trump has been under since Moby Dick was a minnow, does anyone truly believe that he would jeopardize his position by making a stupid phone call with all ears listening in? Really? I mean REALLY? Who the heck believes that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Member Statistics

    41,243
    Total Members
    1,432
    Most Online
    LCMERock
    Newest Member
    LCMERock
    Joined


×
×
  • Create New...