Jump to content

Formal Impeachment Inquiry


PhatMack19

Recommended Posts

Second whistleblower crawls out of the septic tank.  Unless I misread, both are “intelligent types”.  See a pattern?  Look at the list of Big Russian Collusion advocates - Brennan, Clapper, Comey, Strzok, Horowitz, and Page.  The Dems are trying to keep their identities secret.  Could it be Christine Blasey Ford and Michael Avenatti?  Stormy Daniels?

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Hagar said:

Second whistleblower crawls out of the septic tank.  Unless I misread, both are “intelligent types”.  See a pattern?  Look at the list of Big Russian Collusion advocates - Brennan, Clapper, Comey, Strzok, Horowitz, and Page.  The Dems are trying to keep their identities secret.  Could it be Christine Blasey Ford and Michael Avenatti?  Stormy Daniels?

This is the hidden content, please

Probably Hillarious Clintionista!   LOL!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am sure there will be many more "whistleblowers" come available just as there were more "victims" of  Justice Kavanaugh as that debacle unfolded.  What I am very curious about is this- Since we have the transcript of the conversation, what information can the next 100 whistleblowers provide?  All they can give is their "interpretation" of what was said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, stevenash said:

I am sure there will be many more "whistleblowers" come available just as there were more "victims" of  Justice Kavanaugh as that debacle unfolded.  What I am very curious about is this- Since we have the transcript of the conversation, what information can the next 100 whistleblowers provide?  All they can give is their "interpretation" of what was said.

So true. The biggest problem is the people who voted these dims into office can’t think past their noses. I wish I were wrong as rain on that. Hopefully they tire of dim politics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, stevenash said:

I am sure there will be many more "whistleblowers" come available just as there were more "victims" of  Justice Kavanaugh as that debacle unfolded.  What I am very curious about is this- Since we have the transcript of the conversation, what information can the next 100 whistleblowers provide?  All they can give is their "interpretation" of what was said.

Ah contraire.  They’re claiming that the transcript is a redacted version.  There was another 20 minutes, to 14 hours, depending on which liar you listen to.  Which makes me curious, does Trump have a Standing Room Audiencce in the Oval Office every time he makes a phone call?   And both whistleblowers, to my knowledge, are intelligence agents.  If true, Trump would be prudent to remove every intelligence type, or agent, from the WH.  Those agencies are full of democratic operatives.  Everyone in all agencies should be given a lie detector test, and any failures be fired.  They are nothing more than democratic operatives continuing this Third World Coup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Hagar said:

Ah contraire.  They’re claiming that the transcript is a redacted version.  There was another 20 minutes, to 14 hours, depending on which liar you listen to.  Which makes me curious, does Trump have a Standing Room Audiencce in the Oval Office every time he makes a phone call?   And both whistleblowers, to my knowledge, are intelligence agents.  If true, Trump would be prudent to remove every intelligence type, or agent, from the WH.  Those agencies are full of democratic operatives.  Everyone in all agencies should be given a lie detector test, and any failures be fired.  They are nothing more than democratic operatives continuing this Third World Coup.

The reason the difference in length between the transcript and the audio portion is because there was a translator involved.  That's why there is a difference!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,926
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Newest Member
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Joined


  • Posts

    • That there’s not a single thread on the fact that the Republican nominee is on trial for paying off a porn star with whom he had an affair while the future First Lady was carrying said nominee’s child.    I remember back when the dirty, no-good Dems sacked Gary Hart over something similar. Same thing with John Edwards and later Anthony Weiner.    But y’all keep pretending God is on your side, lol. 
    • I hear what you’re saying, BUT… that hammers the hell out of poor people and the ones with multiple properties don’t eat any more than the poor ones. In fact, you’d basically just be taxing a lot of peoples’ EBT payments. The government  can’t get ahead by taxing what they’re already borrowing to give to people.    I think well off people should pay more… but the scale as it exists is broken.    For the sake of argument, my mom’s house in Groves is valued at $125k. 2/1/1 on a slab.  Her tax bill is $850/year. Without exemptions, her bill would be 3200. It’s right on JCAD’s website. The problem is this…. If someone tries to rent out an identical house, they’d expect to get, what… $1200/month? If you take into account that homeowners/windstorm/flood is a minimum of another $2k per year, you’d need $5k a year just to cover the taxes and insurance. That’s four months (1/3 of the year) just to cover those costs, not counting a potential mortgage payment. But then everybody cries about how expensive rents are… you can’t tax the hell out of non-homestead property to make up for gifts given to homeowners in the form of big tax cuts. It just doesn’t work.    Ten acres in Lumberton? I’ve got a buddy with 10 acres in Lumberton on HWY 69. Prime property… it’s his retirement plan. Sale it one day and cash in. The CAD decided that it no longer qualifies for a special use valuation (timber) and stripped his “exemption.” His 2023 tax bill jumped from $25 to $22,000…. It’s insane.  
    • I’m curious what happened… they aren’t even in full pads yet. 
    • They’re going to have win almost all remaining games and get finals of tournament to think about an at-large. When LU was in the WAC, Grand Canyon got an at-large after New Mexico St came out of nowhere to win conference tournament. Grand Canyon had a dang good resume that year. It can happen, but resume wise isn’t in their favor.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...