Jump to content

Formal Impeachment Inquiry


PhatMack19

Recommended Posts

Second whistleblower crawls out of the septic tank.  Unless I misread, both are “intelligent types”.  See a pattern?  Look at the list of Big Russian Collusion advocates - Brennan, Clapper, Comey, Strzok, Horowitz, and Page.  The Dems are trying to keep their identities secret.  Could it be Christine Blasey Ford and Michael Avenatti?  Stormy Daniels?

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Hagar said:

Second whistleblower crawls out of the septic tank.  Unless I misread, both are “intelligent types”.  See a pattern?  Look at the list of Big Russian Collusion advocates - Brennan, Clapper, Comey, Strzok, Horowitz, and Page.  The Dems are trying to keep their identities secret.  Could it be Christine Blasey Ford and Michael Avenatti?  Stormy Daniels?

This is the hidden content, please

Probably Hillarious Clintionista!   LOL!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am sure there will be many more "whistleblowers" come available just as there were more "victims" of  Justice Kavanaugh as that debacle unfolded.  What I am very curious about is this- Since we have the transcript of the conversation, what information can the next 100 whistleblowers provide?  All they can give is their "interpretation" of what was said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, stevenash said:

I am sure there will be many more "whistleblowers" come available just as there were more "victims" of  Justice Kavanaugh as that debacle unfolded.  What I am very curious about is this- Since we have the transcript of the conversation, what information can the next 100 whistleblowers provide?  All they can give is their "interpretation" of what was said.

So true. The biggest problem is the people who voted these dims into office can’t think past their noses. I wish I were wrong as rain on that. Hopefully they tire of dim politics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, stevenash said:

I am sure there will be many more "whistleblowers" come available just as there were more "victims" of  Justice Kavanaugh as that debacle unfolded.  What I am very curious about is this- Since we have the transcript of the conversation, what information can the next 100 whistleblowers provide?  All they can give is their "interpretation" of what was said.

Ah contraire.  They’re claiming that the transcript is a redacted version.  There was another 20 minutes, to 14 hours, depending on which liar you listen to.  Which makes me curious, does Trump have a Standing Room Audiencce in the Oval Office every time he makes a phone call?   And both whistleblowers, to my knowledge, are intelligence agents.  If true, Trump would be prudent to remove every intelligence type, or agent, from the WH.  Those agencies are full of democratic operatives.  Everyone in all agencies should be given a lie detector test, and any failures be fired.  They are nothing more than democratic operatives continuing this Third World Coup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Hagar said:

Ah contraire.  They’re claiming that the transcript is a redacted version.  There was another 20 minutes, to 14 hours, depending on which liar you listen to.  Which makes me curious, does Trump have a Standing Room Audiencce in the Oval Office every time he makes a phone call?   And both whistleblowers, to my knowledge, are intelligence agents.  If true, Trump would be prudent to remove every intelligence type, or agent, from the WH.  Those agencies are full of democratic operatives.  Everyone in all agencies should be given a lie detector test, and any failures be fired.  They are nothing more than democratic operatives continuing this Third World Coup.

The reason the difference in length between the transcript and the audio portion is because there was a translator involved.  That's why there is a difference!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,932
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Newest Member
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Ok, just for fun, list the Trump policies / actions that make him as dirty and immoral as they come. Please don't use the democrat talking points, actual actions that make him dirty, that never seemed to show up UNTIL he was President. And without a doubt you have swallowed the orange man bad koolaid unlike some of us that can dislike the guy and still not make him the worst thing walking, but that seems to be your way, all one way or the other in a debate. 🙂
    • I STRONGLY disagree with this assertion, and you're just making my point for me by trying to say that Biden's corruption is somehow way worse than Trump's with a straight face.  Trump's politics (or at least the politics that suit him) just align with mine significantly more than Biden's.  They're two peas in a pod, but on different sides of the aisle.  I'm sure if I was a diehard conservative all of his issues would seem like minor indiscretions or witch hunts, and if I was a rabid liberal old Sleepy Joe would seem like a strong president who didn't really do much wrong.  But yeah, bless my heart for not swallowing the orange koolaid
    • No one that I know is stumping for Trump because he's the poster boy of integrity, they simply know he's the best choice BY FAR between the two and has been the victim of ridiculous witch hunts since before he was President, that's what folks have a problem with, the crooked lying democrats, but folks like to make it more about Trump than the real problem. And to state that Trump is about as immoral and dirty as they come is ridiculous, I don't like him either but he isn't close to being as corrupt as the crime family in the White House, and you know it. As far as hating on CB, not at all, but he has been ate up with TDS for a while now and it sounds like it may be wearing off on you a little bit, lol.   Bless your hearts!
    • Newton will also have a lot of size, strength, and experience up front. That will probably be the most significant advantage vs Woodville 
    • There's a lot of irony in this post.  You're right, if he was a lefty the liberals wouldn't say a word. But because he's a republican, the righteous right is giving Trump a hard pass on stuff that they've absolutely bombed the left for doing for as long as I've been alive, and are actually feigning indignation about the left criticizing his behavior.  Y'all can hate CB all you want, but he's correct on this one.  the conservative outrage over the left's character assassinations of Trump is hilarious.  Trump is about as immoral and dirty as they come, and it's a real mind bender watching conservative Christians stump so hard for him, especially when Christian values and morality has supposedly been the backbone of the republican party all this time.  And as always, I'll put in my disclaimer that I thought he did a decent job as president and will be voting for him in the election, so nobody throws TDS at me.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...