Jump to content

Baytown Lee vs PNG after the bye week


prepballfan

Recommended Posts

Baytown Lee looks solid and scary. The one thing I will say is they don't seem to have been challenged yet. PNG will be a good test. PNG needs to play solid defense. If we get in a shootout, who knows what will happen. This will be good prep for Crosby either way. The best part is we have fancy new invisible ipads. No more getting caught. Everyone in the crowd gets one, even the little kids. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Rez Ipsa said:

Baytown Lee looks solid and scary. The one thing I will say is they don't seem to have been challenged yet. PNG will be a good test. PNG needs to play solid defense. If we get in a shootout, who knows what will happen. This will be good prep for Crosby either way. The best part is we have fancy new invisible ipads. No more getting caught. Everyone in the crowd gets one, even the little kids. 

Skip right to Crosby huh. Galena park challenged Lee in the 1st Half. Gashed the Lee defense on the ground and air. Lee couldn't tackle and GP didn't have great athletes with the ball. The GP Qb went down and no more scoring.  Now GP couldn't stop Lee in the 2nd half either but I expect the District to have much better and deeper defenses then GP had. 

Splendora defense was way over matched. Westbury was well Westbury.  

I am rooting for a bunch of boys on that Lee team so hopefully they pull it off and make playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GCMNation5 said:

Skip right to Crosby huh. Galena park challenged Lee in the 1st Half. Gashed the Lee defense on the ground and air. Lee couldn't tackle and GP didn't have great athletes with the ball. The GP Qb went down and no more scoring.  Now GP couldn't stop Lee in the 2nd half either but I expect the District to have much better and deeper defenses then GP had. 

Splendora defense was way over matched. Westbury was well Westbury.  

I am rooting for a bunch of boys on that Lee team so hopefully they pull it off and make playoffs.

I think it is good prep for Crosby for Lee as well. I’m not skipping to anything — Do I think PNG will win? Yes. But I think Lee is going to be a force this season, so may the best team win. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not sure how to look at this game. Baytown Lee is undefeated and whipped everyone that they have played which really doesn't amount to much. On the other hand they might have something special going on over there this year. But one thing is for sure we will find out on Friday night. I like the way the 0-3 ned faithful are picking lee lol. That 0-3 record is leaving a bad taste in their mouth. Kinda curious as to what changes they are making to fix their predicament. lol I think both teams will put up points just depends on penalties and turnovers and who has the ball last. Come on Friday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Through three games Ijenea Woosley has 12 tds and 0 picks, he’s completing right at 70% of his passes while averaging almost 10ypc. He’ll probably be the district MVP this year. Including Woosley, Lee has three kids that are averaging over 9ypc. I don’t think Lee is the favorite in this game but I don’t think it’s really an upset if they beat PNG this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cougar14.2 said:

Through three games Ijenea Woosley has 12 tds and 0 picks, he’s completing right at 70% of his passes while averaging almost 10ypc. He’ll probably be the district MVP this year. Including Woosley, Lee has three kids that are averaging over 9ypc. I don’t think Lee is the favorite in this game but I don’t think it’s really an upset if they beat PNG this year. 

As the statistics guru surely you have considered the quality of wins for Baytown Lee. I am quite sure if this were Crosby vs Lee you'd have adequately demonstrated the teams Lee has played vs the team PNG or in the scenario Crosby would have played? For example Westbury has scored exactly 7 points and given up 174. Just an example. I could not tell u who will win, but Id like to think that PNG is the favorite and definitely the Indians have played better competition. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,935
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • That is yet to be determined in trial. ”Taking” in the Fifth Amendment doesn’t mean ownership, title changing hands, etc. A government can “take” your property without “taking” your properties.  That has been true.  This issue is, did Texas take the property under the Fifth Amendment and subsequent Supreme Court rulings and not the dictionary definition of “taking”. As always in the law, definitions matter. 
    • Wrong again. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   The day that Trump took office, our nation debt stood at 19.9 Trillion dollars (End of Q4, 2016).  After his tax cuts (without corresponding cuts in spending), the national debt stood at 23.2 Trillion dollars at the end of Q1 of 2020 that was the Start of COVID, FYI... Or a total increase in debt of almost 17% during Trump's first three years (and one quarter) in office.  At the end of his reign (with COVID spending for which Trump himself signed off on) was at 27.7 Trillion Dollars.  That's a 39% increase in the National Debt while Trump was in office.  For further reference, Biden inherited a 27.7 Trillion dollar debt to start.  At the end of Q4 2023, the debt stands at 34 Trillion.  That's an increase of 19% over the first three years. I know that math and facts hurt your feelings, but Trump was horrible for the country before he allowed "them Dirty Democrats to shut down the economy."  Anybody that says "Trump was good for the country" doesn't know the first thing about micro/macro economics or the effects of deficit spending.  Trump hurt us like no other president, period.  Anybody that says "Trump was good for the economy" is actually stating for the rest of us with some sense "I don't know what I'm talking about."
    • But of course you wouldn’t understand the saying. You’re so clever. Your education precedes you. 
    • Hmmmm..... Didn't they just win a football state championship?
    • The fact that you try to bolster your assertion that Trump was a bad president by using "facts" that are not attributable to him is disinformation at it's worse. It is "lying by omission", which is just another way to say big ol' fat lie. Unemployment was going down to record lows before Covid hit. You and I and almost everyone on Earth knows this, but somehow you try to spin this stat as a knock on Trump. Same for the stock market. LYING BY OMISSION. A tactic almost as old as prostitution. The debt and spending exploding due to Trump is just an old fashioned bald face lie. You seem to follow the mantra "if you tell a lie enough times it becomes fact." You are starting to resemble Biden now. Do you have any other whoppers to share?  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...