Jump to content

Has PA Titans toned down the input?


Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...
9 hours ago, 87JAG said:

I don't know why people underestimating PA. Did they expose someones coaching short comings? Did they make someones son look like a first year player? They were prevented from playing in that league for a reason.  Step your game up!

 

So PA does not play in STJFL? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/14/2019 at 9:51 AM, BIG STEPPER.... said:

Yes I do feel that’s the reason! The league is watered down, you can’t teach and really compete due to the rules in place! Hey you can’t score here/ he’s too big all BS rules that’s NOT football. Than you speak ur mind and hey you have to watch how you talk on here.

Yes, i agree, TYFA is the way to go. There is no crying to anyone about losing or anything else. Eat or be eaten. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, ramblindeuce said:

i dont think we have to concern ourselves with all that. Stjfl is tearing itself apart from the inside out. However, i do like that idea

It is hard enough for teams like PN-G to compete at the younger levels. Once they reach seniors (6th grade) most of the kids who are playing because the parents force them are weeded out. At the younger levels it would be good to have an A and B team. Otherwise you get two watered down teams with 5 or 6 good players if you are lucky. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/14/2019 at 9:53 PM, P.A Texas in da building said:

Why is it that there's not much talk on here anymore about STJFL, did Port Arthur winning championships on all three levels of tackle quiet the chatter,?asking for a friend?

So PA, did yall get in trouble by the "ethics" committee for running up the score a couple weeks ago? 

 

Didn't think so.  Helps to be head of the "ethics" committee. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On ‎10‎/‎19‎/‎2019 at 4:38 PM, Pngfan2014 said:

So PA, did yall get in trouble by the "ethics" committee for running up the score a couple weeks ago? 

 

Didn't think so.  Helps to be head of the "ethics" committee. 

Sorry it took me so long to reply. But what's running up the score? the rules states take your starting back field out correct? Well how bout this all the starters was out, ran the same play "twice" they tackle the first time the second times 3 kids missed the tackle. My idea is instead of crying practiced tackling and you guys wont feel the score is being ran up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/30/2019 at 5:35 AM, BIG STEPPER.... said:

Sorry it took me so long to reply. But what's running up the score? the rules states take your starting back field out correct? Well how bout this all the starters was out, ran the same play "twice" they tackle the first time the second times 3 kids missed the tackle. My idea is instead of crying practiced tackling and you guys wont feel the score is being ran up.

Seems like the only ppl wanting smoke is other P.A. teams. Mine says he  has a point to prove. Here's to a healthy game, good to both teams. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/2/2019 at 11:20 AM, thaghost said:

Seems like the only ppl wanting smoke is other P.A. teams. Mine says he  has a point to prove. Here's to a healthy game, good to both teams. 

It is reaaly hard to talk trash about teams below the senior level. Most teams are watered down. Look what happens in senior. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,935
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Diboll - 1  Central Heights- 0
    • Just to expound a little further, so you are not confused...I, along with so many others, are laughing at your desperation. You are working overtime, nay, double even triple time, trying to convince normal people Trump was bad for the country. His policies provided for peace all over the world, low gas prices, low food prices, energy independence, closed border, low inflation, record low unemployment, and on and on and on. You try to counter this narrative by saying unemployment skyrocketed on his watch. You said this knowing full well the unemployment rate went up due to Covid. Your narrative is just so laughable, to the point of side-splitting hilarity. Who would even attempt this asinine narrative? Now, even if you get past the utter stupidity of that MSNBC talking point, you provide another side-splitting hilarious tidbit of evidence to back your claim of Trump being bad for the country. You actually tried to tie the stock market going down to Trump...after Covid. You, I, and everybody else knows the stock market was flourishing under Trump...until Covid hit. This argument is just as bad as the other one. Again, who would even attempt this narrative? The only thing you could remotely muster that had any sliver of truthfulness, is that spending increased. Sure, Trump rebuilt the military and gave them a deserved raise. But he also had to shut down the government due to Democrats demanding an even more, and very detrimental, increase in spending. And in a true extremely exaggerated fashion, you proclaim that spending "skyrocketed". Again, who would even attempt this narrative? I think I can smell the desperation. Do you have any other whoppers to contribute?
    • He was injured but has returned and he decided not to play baseball this year.
    • There's some truth to that.......some.
    • The AD's job is to win in football. Everything else is window dressing. If the football team is winning the rest can go up in smoke. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...