Jump to content

Beaumont West Brook 56 Houston Bellaire 35/FINAL

WOSgrad

By WOSgrad
in High School Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

BMTSoulja1

BMTSoulja1

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, 82 5A State Champs said:

I only stayed for the first half, so my opinion may be skewed a little. If someone told me that Yeoman was the best option at QB, I would say there's no way. His passes were way off target, he gives away his passing direction due to him centering on one receiver, instead of making his check downs, and he runs like he's got cinder blocks attached to his feet. Once again, the offense lacked spark with him under center. When Bryce came in for a series, his running ability definitely brings another dynamic that Yeoman doesnt posses, and he marched the offense right down field, and scored. Yes, it was the first game, but there's alot of work that needs to be done if #14 is going to remain the starter. That being said he must have made some improvements in the second half, because Brook poured on the points. However, the defense wasnt on point, because we gave up 35 points to a team that we shut out 55-0, last year. IMO, give the reins to Bryce Anderson, let him grow, as he definitely gives West Brook the best chance to win. Much improvement needs to be made, as Strake Jesuit is going to bring their A game, next week.

From what I'm told by two reliable sources,  Belaire is a lot better than last year with real speed and size in the trenches and WB had some defensive assignment breakdowns, which lead to a couple of scoring drives for Belaire.  Also, you were there for a half, but I heard Yowman was on the money in the second half.  Yea, he cant run, but that kid can throw that rock.  Once that young Defense grows up and the DC gets it together, Brook will peak a couple of games into district.  They'll be fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Buddy Garrity

Mr. Buddy Garrity

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, 82 5A State Champs said:

I only stayed for the first half, so my opinion may be skewed a little. If someone told me that Yeoman was the best option at QB, I would say there's no way. His passes were way off target, he gives away his passing direction due to him centering on one receiver, instead of making his check downs, and he runs like he's got cinder blocks attached to his feet. Once again, the offense lacked spark with him under center. When Bryce came in for a series, his running ability definitely brings another dynamic that Yeoman doesnt posses, and he marched the offense right down field, and scored. Yes, it was the first game, but there's alot of work that needs to be done if #14 is going to remain the starter. That being said he must have made some improvements in the second half, because Brook poured on the points. However, the defense wasnt on point, because we gave up 35 points to a team that we shut out 55-0, last year. IMO, give the reins to Bryce Anderson, let him grow, as he definitely gives West Brook the best chance to win. Much improvement needs to be made, as Strake Jesuit is going to bring their A game, next week.

Troy was on point from mid 2nd quarter on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Buddy Garrity

Mr. Buddy Garrity

Posted
Posted
Just now, 82 5A State Champs said:

May be, but he still runs like a fat kid dodging a red ball. With him in the game, the offense is one dimensional, with no run chances. 

He's not a runner, he's a pocket passer. If the OL does their job the offense runs itself. WB has RBs to tote the rock. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Yeoj

Yeoj

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, 82 5A State Champs said:

May be, but he still runs like a fat kid dodging a red ball. With him in the game, the offense is one dimensional, with no run chances. 

Yowman threw for at least 200 yards and 3 TDs and it could have easily been double that. The offense is more balanced than its has been for years. With this kid in at QB the entire field has to be defended by the opposing defense. The early issues with the offense was OC trying to pound the ball into a 8 and 9 man front. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Yeoj

Yeoj

Posted
Posted
22 hours ago, West Brook said:

Can anyone help me understand him playing kids both was in a non district game.And wouldn't play them in the State Game

He had Johnson and Pierre playing CB and FS for a series to see how that would work. He let Johnson play CB in spots throught the playoffs and in the State championship game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
5GallonBucket

5GallonBucket

Posted
Posted
55 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

A QB that goes 23-29 for 304 yards and 4 TD's in a win is not good enough? SMH

I know right 

It’s cause fans got used to lray for the last 3 years.  And the excitement he brought cause it was more spontaneous.

as long as the oline does its job then Wb will win as far as regular season goes

the true test will be against ns  

possibly lamar could be a test

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,932
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Newest Member
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Joined


  • Posts

    • tvc184
      It’s kinda weird…

      By tvc184 · Posted

      Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • Englebert
      It’s kinda weird…

      By Englebert · Posted

      You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • UT alum
      It’s kinda weird…

      By UT alum · Posted

      Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • UT alum
      It’s kinda weird…

      By UT alum · Posted

      Election interference. Cheating.
    • UT alum
      It’s kinda weird…

      By UT alum · Posted

      It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...