Jump to content

PN-G/WO-S Scrimmage Thread


Indianforever

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, biaplayer said:

I wouldn't go there the scoreboard info was so small I couldn't hardly make out what everything was, I didn't have my glasses on so  that is why it prob looked so small. lol I figured by the way you pumped it up like it was some kind of huge scoreboard like whats up in Texas Stadium lol 🙂

Were u on home side or visitor?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, biaplayer said:

I wouldn't go there the scoreboard info was so small I couldn't hardly make out what everything was, I didn't have my glasses on so  that is why it prob looked so small. lol I figured by the way you pumped it up like it was some kind of huge scoreboard like whats up in Texas Stadium lol 🙂

It was kind of a sarcastic comment because there was a whole thread about it a few weeks back. I was kinda poking at that thread. I agree with you that is was small on the bottom. I actually operated the scoreboard at the scrimmage. It was easy to work. The rep from  the scoreboard company was there and there is a way to use the big screen for time and score also. Will see how they proceed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, MrUmp1 said:

It was kind of a sarcastic comment because there was a whole thread about it a few weeks back. I was kinda poking at that thread. I agree with you that is was small on the bottom. I actually operated the scoreboard at the scrimmage. It was easy to work. The rep from  the scoreboard company was there and there is a way to use the big screen for time and score also. Will see how they proceed.

I thought I sensed some sarcasm. But I am still confused. A guy from work went last week and told me they did not use it for the scrimmage. After all that in the other thread, I don't believe it til I see it. Won't be long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎8‎/‎22‎/‎2019 at 6:11 PM, MrUmp1 said:

It was kind of a sarcastic comment because there was a whole thread about it a few weeks back. I was kinda poking at that thread. I agree with you that is was small on the bottom. I actually operated the scoreboard at the scrimmage. It was easy to work. The rep from  the scoreboard company was there and there is a way to use the big screen for time and score also. Will see how they proceed.

sweet lol I hear ya, hell you have to let them enjoy their new scoreboard and their new turf which looked great btw. I didn't like the way they went dark green for 20 yards then light green alternating.  I think it would have looked better one color all the way thru. Just my opinion

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,900
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    adline
    Newest Member
    adline
    Joined



  • Posts

    • How do you know that Harrison is not a big opportunity? I don't really know him, but maybe just maybe he is what Liberty needs. I was just wondering what you know about Harrison that doesn't make him a big opportunity. 
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • The last 2 or so minutes are so true
    • Looking back at the exact wording, it seems like you are correct and it was the concrete barriers that were the ultimate problem. I mentioned it in my last comment, even if it was just the barriers, did Texas take his property? I think a case like US v. Causby might go a long way to proving his case. Causby had an egg farm and during World War II, the US government started flying four engine heavy bombers for the war effort, low over his farm at full power. The extremely loud noise killed a bunch of his chickens and caused many of the rest of them to quit laying eggs. Even though he legally still on the property, he sued, saying that the federal government had effectively “taken” the use of his property from him. The US Supreme Court sided with him, saying that for the purposes of the Fifth Amendment, the federal government had indeed taken away the use of his property. It wasn’t intentional but that didn’t matter. It seems like this case would fall somewhere along those lines.
    • That might have added to it but it said that they intentionally raised the roadway to help it act as a dam. Even if it was the dividers and no intent, did the state “take” his property without compensation? I think that it is interesting that a local landowner fought his case all the way to the US Supreme Court and won in a unanimous decision. So while he has not won his case yet, he won the right to have his day in court and possibly heard by a jury.     
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...