Jump to content

Wos jumbotron


Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, WOSdrummer99 said:

 

Bc won't happen. But I guess we will see.

This is funny. WOS would never merge with BC. LCM and WOS are in the same city limits. To be honest if it would save tax money I would be all for the merger. OC just went up in taxes and LCM school tax is highest in the county. But off topic me and my wos buddy was talking about if there were ever possible merger with wos and LCM. We would be around 1500 kids. We believe that we could be district champs with current area 5a d2 district they have now.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, LC-M said:

This is funny. WOS would never merge with BC. LCM and WOS are in the same city limits. To be honest if it would save tax money I would be all for the merger. OC just went up in taxes and LCM school tax is highest in the county. But off topic me and my wos buddy was talking about if there were ever possible merger with wos and LCM. We would be around 1500 kids. We believe that we could be district champs with current area 5a d2 district they have now.  

I don't think it would be up to WOS where they ended up.  Besides... they would all just be following Dan Ray to BC.  

:)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I recall (I'm not going to research to confirm) the last two or three bond issues did address academics/buildings with little to no athletic improvements, even voting down turf one time. The fact that they addressed athletics in the last bond and the voters approved does not mean they have neglected academic facilities. 

By the same token, bond passing doesn't factor much in their academic fails. They have struggled for some time but I would say this is probably the first time for most to see their rating in black and white. They better wake up and focus strongly before things get worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
19 hours ago, LC-M said:

I doubt they would merge. It would be more like Texas City isd over LAmarque. 

Sure... something like that.  

There would be some very unhappy WOS fans, to say the least.  The sad thing is that they won't have voice in the matter when it happens.  They only formed in '77 and have been a complete failure by every measurable criteria.... academics, enrollment, etc.....it's not at all hard to imagine them fading into memory. 

Their priorities are obviously all out-of-whack and the need oversight... that's beyond dispute. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CardinalBacker said:

Sure... something like that.  

There would be some very unhappy WOS fans, to say the least.  The sad thing is that they won't have voice in the matter when it happens.  They only formed in '77 and have been a complete failure by every measurable criteria.... academics, enrollment, etc.....it's not at all hard to imagine them fading into memory. 

Their priorities are obviously all out-of-whack and the need oversight... that's beyond dispute. 

Most of the WOS fans on here prob don’t even live In the school district. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,926
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Newest Member
    TRUTHTELLER409
    Joined



  • Posts

    • That there’s not a single thread on the fact that the Republican nominee is on trial for paying off a porn star with whom he had an affair while the future First Lady was carrying said nominee’s child.    I remember back when the dirty, no-good Dems sacked Gary Hart over something similar. Same thing with John Edwards and later Anthony Weiner.    But y’all keep pretending God is on your side, lol. 
    • I hear what you’re saying, BUT… that hammers the hell out of poor people and the ones with multiple properties don’t eat any more than the poor ones. In fact, you’d basically just be taxing a lot of peoples’ EBT payments. The government  can’t get ahead by taxing what they’re already borrowing to give to people.    I think well off people should pay more… but the scale as it exists is broken.    For the sake of argument, my mom’s house in Groves is valued at $125k. 2/1/1 on a slab.  Her tax bill is $850/year. Without exemptions, her bill would be 3200. It’s right on JCAD’s website. The problem is this…. If someone tries to rent out an identical house, they’d expect to get, what… $1200/month? If you take into account that homeowners/windstorm/flood is a minimum of another $2k per year, you’d need $5k a year just to cover the taxes and insurance. That’s four months (1/3 of the year) just to cover those costs, not counting a potential mortgage payment. But then everybody cries about how expensive rents are… you can’t tax the hell out of non-homestead property to make up for gifts given to homeowners in the form of big tax cuts. It just doesn’t work.    Ten acres in Lumberton? I’ve got a buddy with 10 acres in Lumberton on HWY 69. Prime property… it’s his retirement plan. Sale it one day and cash in. The CAD decided that it no longer qualifies for a special use valuation (timber) and stripped his “exemption.” His 2023 tax bill jumped from $25 to $22,000…. It’s insane.  
    • I’m curious what happened… they aren’t even in full pads yet. 
    • They’re going to have win almost all remaining games and get finals of tournament to think about an at-large. When LU was in the WAC, Grand Canyon got an at-large after New Mexico St came out of nowhere to win conference tournament. Grand Canyon had a dang good resume that year. It can happen, but resume wise isn’t in their favor.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...