Jump to content

Trump May In Fact Get Another Supreme Court Pick!

Reagan

By Reagan
in Political Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

Reagan

Reagan

Posted
  • Author
Posted
3 hours ago, Reagan said:

 

 

If she was a good American, she would quit and live out the remainder of her life in peace.  But -- she is not a good American.  Meaning, doing what's right for America.  She's like the 2 other women:  Put on the court to do the left's agenda even when it's at odds with the constitution. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PhatMack19

PhatMack19

Posted
Posted
35 minutes ago, Reagan said:

If she was a good American, she would quit and live out the remainder of her life in peace.  But -- she is not a good American.  Meaning, doing what's right for America.  She's like the 2 other women:  Put on the court to do the left's agenda even when it's at odds with the constitution. 

I believe she wanted the first woman president(Hillary) to name her replacement.  Sorry her girl lost.  She should have retired when Obama was in office.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PhatMack19

PhatMack19

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, stevenash said:

The sexual misconduct allegations are being planned but they have to wait to see if appointee is man or woman.

It’s going to be Amy Coney Barrett.  She’s a female and has black kids so the racist thing is out.  They have already started attacking some of the lower level appointees for being Catholic, so I’m sure that will be the angle the go after.  It’s 53-47 so it won’t matter.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
BS Wildcats

BS Wildcats

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, PhatMack19 said:

Rumors/conspiracy theories are heating up.  RBG is on life support and the Dems will keep her alive until Trump is gone.  

 

This is the hidden content, please

I guess we, the taxpayer, will pay the exorbitant fees for this this, if true.  The dim/socialist party have truly lost their minds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LumRaiderFan

LumRaiderFan

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, Tigers2010 said:

If someone is on life support, can they do their job effectively? Alive or not, if your on life support, you should be replaced. It sounds strange to even have to say that.

Agree...it looks like there is no good mechanism in place to replace an incapacitated SCJ other than impeachment.

Can you imagine that circus if attempted?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
UT alum

UT alum

Posted
Posted
On 1/12/2019 at 2:51 PM, Reagan said:

If she was a good American, she would quit and live out the remainder of her life in peace.  But -- she is not a good American.  Meaning, doing what's right for America.  She's like the 2 other women:  Put on the court to do the left's agenda even when it's at odds with the constitution. 

And they all got 60 votes to be there. Give me a break.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tigers2010

Tigers2010

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

I don’t disagree with these common sense ideas, only problem is it would take an act of Congress, literally, to enforce it if the SCJ won’t or can’t budge.

I don't think it'll matter. From what I read, I don't see her making it to the end of the year. Barring something barbaric, like keeping a dead person hooked up to a machine for political reason. Buuuuttt, Democrats do love killing babies so who knows

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,933
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • tvc184
      It’s kinda weird…

      By tvc184 · Posted

      Yeah, I got that but talk about a stretch. It should seem obvious that Trump’s prosecution is purely political. If someone is going to do a whataboutism, at least make it similar.  This is so ludicrous that it’s like comparing a ham sandwich to a wallet.   
    • Englebert
      It’s kinda weird…

      By Englebert · Posted

      You consistently try to say Trump ran our debt up and that the stock market and job market cratered during his administration (along with other MSNBC talking points). That is a flat out LIE, and you know it. Not only are you telling a mistruth, you knowingly are telling a mistruth...which is a blatant LIE...which makes you a "(I don't remember what word you used to describe Trump, something like a purse for dirt)" does it not? You know for a fact that the economy, stock market, and job market was thriving under Trump. You know that the Democrats controlled the house, and proposed a budget that would hurt the economy, in which he shut down the government. Even after this fiasco brought on by Democrats, our economy flourished under his administration. Then Covid19 hit, and the blue states shut down the country. YOU KNOW THIS, but continue to blame Trump. You lie...blatantly. Again, what do we call these people that partake in disseminating misleading information. You coined it...that purse thing. Does the shoe fit? I bet it does. It is amazing that you try to put "MAGA people" into this little box for the soul purpose of allowing all negative attributes of anyone that will vote for Trump instead of Biden to be attributed. That is a sickening modus operandi of stupid people. It is hard for me to believe that you would adopt that childish stereotyping. But since you are willing, I'm willing to push back. I'm a Trump supporter. I will gladly vote for him over Biden. So get busy putting me in your silly little box of stereotypes so I can embarrass you some more. You've been shot down by practically everyone on this board when you say stuff like Trump is their Messiah, or that supporters overlook his flaws. Everyone on this board has stated that they don't agree with Trump on much of his behavior, but you ignore these statements and continue with your lies. Oh yeah, since I'm a Trump supporter, those comments were also directed directly at me. So let's go. Prove I'm a simpleton that will ignore all of Trump's flaws and vow to disown the bad ol' orangeman. Let's continue that diatribe you peddle. I now am interested in responding. I also have boxes I can place people in. Whose box is accurate? Better yet, whose box is more embarrassing? I'm fairly certain your box is more entertaining for the board to make fun of. TDS should be included in the DSM-6, or revise the DSM-5 to include it since this phenomenon is so pervasive now. You are a walking, talking picture of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do you like that box? Can you refute the rationale for placing you in that box. Everyone can refute your rationale for placing them into your irrational box, while you languish in your TDS box.
    • UT alum
      It’s kinda weird…

      By UT alum · Posted

      Clinton got impeached because of it. David Pecker said it was true about Stormy today. Under oath.
    • UT alum
      It’s kinda weird…

      By UT alum · Posted

      Election interference. Cheating.
    • UT alum
      It’s kinda weird…

      By UT alum · Posted

      It’s not about worrying about Trump’s morality. It’s about him being held to a totally hypocritical standard that is applied to anybody else that’s not him. Double it if it happens to be a Democrat. What he did to Ted Cruz in 2016, for example. Accused him of extramarital affairs. Really? And the gang cheered the Master on. Sick is what it is.

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...